Institutionalization of Public-Private Partnership: Global Experiences and the Basic Outlines of a Proposal for Slovenia
Experiences show that countries use one of the following three forms for “institutionalisation” of their private-public partnership (PPP) activities: (i) centralised, (ii) decentralised, and (iii) mixed. The article argues that the form of mixed PPP “institutionalisation” would be the most appropria...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)
2006-03-01
|
| Series: | Central European Public Administration Review |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.uni-lj.si/CEPAR/article/view/20209 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832591424899514368 |
|---|---|
| author | Mojmir Mrak |
| author_facet | Mojmir Mrak |
| author_sort | Mojmir Mrak |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Experiences show that countries use one of the following three forms for “institutionalisation” of their private-public partnership (PPP) activities: (i) centralised, (ii) decentralised, and (iii) mixed. The article argues that the form of mixed PPP “institutionalisation” would be the most appropriate for Slovenia. The institutional structure would be composed of three institutions: (i) central PPP unit responsible, first, for horizontal coordination of all PPP policies in the country, and second, for implementation of PPP projects in all those areas where sectoral PPP units would not be created, (ii) very limited number of sectoral PPP units (probably 1 to 2) that would be responsible for implementation of PPP projects in their respective sectors, and (iii) advisory board that would advise the central PPP unit in designing the most complex segments of the PPP policies in the country and would provide a platform for professional discussion and for communication with the public at large on a wide variety of PPP issues. In substance terms, the central PPP unit would be responsible directly to the government while in organisational terms, it would be incorporated into the institutional structure of the ministry of finance with the head of the unit being directly responsible to the minister of finance. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-1e44cc5deb1f46fa84f993f65a5d0422 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2591-2240 2591-2259 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2006-03-01 |
| publisher | University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Central European Public Administration Review |
| spelling | doaj-art-1e44cc5deb1f46fa84f993f65a5d04222025-01-22T10:56:30ZengUniversity of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)Central European Public Administration Review2591-22402591-22592006-03-014110.17573/cepar.v4i1.56Institutionalization of Public-Private Partnership: Global Experiences and the Basic Outlines of a Proposal for SloveniaMojmir MrakExperiences show that countries use one of the following three forms for “institutionalisation” of their private-public partnership (PPP) activities: (i) centralised, (ii) decentralised, and (iii) mixed. The article argues that the form of mixed PPP “institutionalisation” would be the most appropriate for Slovenia. The institutional structure would be composed of three institutions: (i) central PPP unit responsible, first, for horizontal coordination of all PPP policies in the country, and second, for implementation of PPP projects in all those areas where sectoral PPP units would not be created, (ii) very limited number of sectoral PPP units (probably 1 to 2) that would be responsible for implementation of PPP projects in their respective sectors, and (iii) advisory board that would advise the central PPP unit in designing the most complex segments of the PPP policies in the country and would provide a platform for professional discussion and for communication with the public at large on a wide variety of PPP issues. In substance terms, the central PPP unit would be responsible directly to the government while in organisational terms, it would be incorporated into the institutional structure of the ministry of finance with the head of the unit being directly responsible to the minister of finance.https://journals.uni-lj.si/CEPAR/article/view/20209private-public partnershipinstitutionalization |
| spellingShingle | Mojmir Mrak Institutionalization of Public-Private Partnership: Global Experiences and the Basic Outlines of a Proposal for Slovenia Central European Public Administration Review private-public partnership institutionalization |
| title | Institutionalization of Public-Private Partnership: Global Experiences and the Basic Outlines of a Proposal for Slovenia |
| title_full | Institutionalization of Public-Private Partnership: Global Experiences and the Basic Outlines of a Proposal for Slovenia |
| title_fullStr | Institutionalization of Public-Private Partnership: Global Experiences and the Basic Outlines of a Proposal for Slovenia |
| title_full_unstemmed | Institutionalization of Public-Private Partnership: Global Experiences and the Basic Outlines of a Proposal for Slovenia |
| title_short | Institutionalization of Public-Private Partnership: Global Experiences and the Basic Outlines of a Proposal for Slovenia |
| title_sort | institutionalization of public private partnership global experiences and the basic outlines of a proposal for slovenia |
| topic | private-public partnership institutionalization |
| url | https://journals.uni-lj.si/CEPAR/article/view/20209 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mojmirmrak institutionalizationofpublicprivatepartnershipglobalexperiencesandthebasicoutlinesofaproposalforslovenia |