Liver Transplantation: Evolving Patient Selection Criteria

The widespread recognition of the success of liver transplantation as a treatment for most types of acute and chronic liver failure has led to increased referrals for transplantation in the setting of a relatively fixed supply of cadaver donor organs. These events have led to a marked lengthening of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andy S Yu, Aijaz Ahmed, Emmet B Keeffe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2001-01-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2001/743019
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832552827771158528
author Andy S Yu
Aijaz Ahmed
Emmet B Keeffe
author_facet Andy S Yu
Aijaz Ahmed
Emmet B Keeffe
author_sort Andy S Yu
collection DOAJ
description The widespread recognition of the success of liver transplantation as a treatment for most types of acute and chronic liver failure has led to increased referrals for transplantation in the setting of a relatively fixed supply of cadaver donor organs. These events have led to a marked lengthening of the waiting time for liver transplantation, resulting in increased deaths of those on the waiting list and sicker patients undergoing transplantation. Nearly 5000 liver transplantations were performed in the United States in 2000, while the waiting list grew to over 17,000 patients. The mounting disparity between the number of liver transplant candidates and the limited supply of donor organs has led to reassessment of the selection and listing criteria for liver transplantation, as well as revision of organ allocation and distribution policies for cadaver livers. The development of minimal listing criteria for patients with chronic liver disease based on a specific definition for decompensation of cirrhosis has facilitated the more uniform listing of patients at individual centres across the United States. The United Network for Organ Sharing, under pressure from transplant professionals, patient advocacy groups and the federal government, has continuously revised allocation and distribution policies based on the ethical principles of justice for the individual patient versus optimal utility of the limited organ supply available annually. Beginning in 2002, it is likely that the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score will be implemented to determine disease severity and direct donor organs to the sickest patients rather than to those with the longest waiting times.
format Article
id doaj-art-1d993ad086c342edba296e1e84581cc3
institution Kabale University
issn 0835-7900
language English
publishDate 2001-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
spelling doaj-art-1d993ad086c342edba296e1e84581cc32025-02-03T05:57:39ZengWileyCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology0835-79002001-01-01151172973810.1155/2001/743019Liver Transplantation: Evolving Patient Selection CriteriaAndy S Yu0Aijaz Ahmed1Emmet B Keeffe2Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USADivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USADivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USAThe widespread recognition of the success of liver transplantation as a treatment for most types of acute and chronic liver failure has led to increased referrals for transplantation in the setting of a relatively fixed supply of cadaver donor organs. These events have led to a marked lengthening of the waiting time for liver transplantation, resulting in increased deaths of those on the waiting list and sicker patients undergoing transplantation. Nearly 5000 liver transplantations were performed in the United States in 2000, while the waiting list grew to over 17,000 patients. The mounting disparity between the number of liver transplant candidates and the limited supply of donor organs has led to reassessment of the selection and listing criteria for liver transplantation, as well as revision of organ allocation and distribution policies for cadaver livers. The development of minimal listing criteria for patients with chronic liver disease based on a specific definition for decompensation of cirrhosis has facilitated the more uniform listing of patients at individual centres across the United States. The United Network for Organ Sharing, under pressure from transplant professionals, patient advocacy groups and the federal government, has continuously revised allocation and distribution policies based on the ethical principles of justice for the individual patient versus optimal utility of the limited organ supply available annually. Beginning in 2002, it is likely that the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score will be implemented to determine disease severity and direct donor organs to the sickest patients rather than to those with the longest waiting times.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2001/743019
spellingShingle Andy S Yu
Aijaz Ahmed
Emmet B Keeffe
Liver Transplantation: Evolving Patient Selection Criteria
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
title Liver Transplantation: Evolving Patient Selection Criteria
title_full Liver Transplantation: Evolving Patient Selection Criteria
title_fullStr Liver Transplantation: Evolving Patient Selection Criteria
title_full_unstemmed Liver Transplantation: Evolving Patient Selection Criteria
title_short Liver Transplantation: Evolving Patient Selection Criteria
title_sort liver transplantation evolving patient selection criteria
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2001/743019
work_keys_str_mv AT andysyu livertransplantationevolvingpatientselectioncriteria
AT aijazahmed livertransplantationevolvingpatientselectioncriteria
AT emmetbkeeffe livertransplantationevolvingpatientselectioncriteria