Mechanism Analysis of Strategy Choice of Bankruptcy Reorganization Participants under Government Incentive Mechanism

This study constructs an evolutionary game model of government, creditors, investors, and enterprises participating in bankruptcy reorganization, analyzes the strategy selection mechanism of the four parties under the government incentive mechanism, systematically analyzes the strategy selection pro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Danyu Zhao, Li Song
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Complexity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8286436
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832552898279505920
author Danyu Zhao
Li Song
author_facet Danyu Zhao
Li Song
author_sort Danyu Zhao
collection DOAJ
description This study constructs an evolutionary game model of government, creditors, investors, and enterprises participating in bankruptcy reorganization, analyzes the strategy selection mechanism of the four parties under the government incentive mechanism, systematically analyzes the strategy selection process of each participant, discusses the effectiveness of government incentives in promoting the bankruptcy reorganization process, and finds out the stable point in the replication dynamic system. Finally, MATLAB 2018 software is used to numerically model the influence of key elements of the system. The research shows that under the government’s incentive mechanism, creditors participate in bankruptcy reorganization in the form of debt-to-equity swaps, investors participate in bankruptcy reorganization in the form of providing high-quality assets, and enterprises participate in bankruptcy reorganization in the form of reform and transformation which is a stable strategy to replicate the dynamic system; the strategy of the enterprises will affect the strategy choice of creditors and investors; the completion of bankruptcy reorganization is inseparable from the government’s incentives, and the government’s strategy will directly affect the strategic choice of enterprises; and the government’s support and constraint strength satisfy the following quantitative relationship: when M1>S3–C1 and L1>B1–C1, it can better promote the bankruptcy and reorganization process.
format Article
id doaj-art-1d78dbf6b8b44200a2639c6653648a9a
institution Kabale University
issn 1099-0526
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Complexity
spelling doaj-art-1d78dbf6b8b44200a2639c6653648a9a2025-02-03T05:57:30ZengWileyComplexity1099-05262022-01-01202210.1155/2022/8286436Mechanism Analysis of Strategy Choice of Bankruptcy Reorganization Participants under Government Incentive MechanismDanyu Zhao0Li Song1School of ManagementSchool of ManagementThis study constructs an evolutionary game model of government, creditors, investors, and enterprises participating in bankruptcy reorganization, analyzes the strategy selection mechanism of the four parties under the government incentive mechanism, systematically analyzes the strategy selection process of each participant, discusses the effectiveness of government incentives in promoting the bankruptcy reorganization process, and finds out the stable point in the replication dynamic system. Finally, MATLAB 2018 software is used to numerically model the influence of key elements of the system. The research shows that under the government’s incentive mechanism, creditors participate in bankruptcy reorganization in the form of debt-to-equity swaps, investors participate in bankruptcy reorganization in the form of providing high-quality assets, and enterprises participate in bankruptcy reorganization in the form of reform and transformation which is a stable strategy to replicate the dynamic system; the strategy of the enterprises will affect the strategy choice of creditors and investors; the completion of bankruptcy reorganization is inseparable from the government’s incentives, and the government’s strategy will directly affect the strategic choice of enterprises; and the government’s support and constraint strength satisfy the following quantitative relationship: when M1>S3–C1 and L1>B1–C1, it can better promote the bankruptcy and reorganization process.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8286436
spellingShingle Danyu Zhao
Li Song
Mechanism Analysis of Strategy Choice of Bankruptcy Reorganization Participants under Government Incentive Mechanism
Complexity
title Mechanism Analysis of Strategy Choice of Bankruptcy Reorganization Participants under Government Incentive Mechanism
title_full Mechanism Analysis of Strategy Choice of Bankruptcy Reorganization Participants under Government Incentive Mechanism
title_fullStr Mechanism Analysis of Strategy Choice of Bankruptcy Reorganization Participants under Government Incentive Mechanism
title_full_unstemmed Mechanism Analysis of Strategy Choice of Bankruptcy Reorganization Participants under Government Incentive Mechanism
title_short Mechanism Analysis of Strategy Choice of Bankruptcy Reorganization Participants under Government Incentive Mechanism
title_sort mechanism analysis of strategy choice of bankruptcy reorganization participants under government incentive mechanism
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8286436
work_keys_str_mv AT danyuzhao mechanismanalysisofstrategychoiceofbankruptcyreorganizationparticipantsundergovernmentincentivemechanism
AT lisong mechanismanalysisofstrategychoiceofbankruptcyreorganizationparticipantsundergovernmentincentivemechanism