The impact of frailty on functional recovery after cardiac surgery—a case control study

Abstract Background Good functional recovery after cardiac surgery can be reported as ‘days alive and out of hospital’ in the first 30 days after a procedure (DAOH30) and ‘days at home’ in the first year (DAH365), which integrate several clinically important outcomes, including death, hospital lengt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Abdelmonem, M. Elsayed, D. Awadallah, O. Don, R. H. Bennett, O. G. Mackay, S. Pookayil, C. Archer, M. Mahgoub, M. J. Bennett
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-04-01
Series:Perioperative Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-025-00526-8
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849709778528370688
author M. Abdelmonem
M. Elsayed
D. Awadallah
O. Don
R. H. Bennett
O. G. Mackay
S. Pookayil
C. Archer
M. Mahgoub
M. J. Bennett
author_facet M. Abdelmonem
M. Elsayed
D. Awadallah
O. Don
R. H. Bennett
O. G. Mackay
S. Pookayil
C. Archer
M. Mahgoub
M. J. Bennett
author_sort M. Abdelmonem
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Good functional recovery after cardiac surgery can be reported as ‘days alive and out of hospital’ in the first 30 days after a procedure (DAOH30) and ‘days at home’ in the first year (DAH365), which integrate several clinically important outcomes, including death, hospital length of stay, quality of recovery and hospital readmission. They depend on the preservation or early recovery of physiological and functional capacity, both of which may be lost in patients living with frailty. Case presentation We measured frailty with a multidimensional approach, incorporating 30 variables spanning comorbidity, sensory, cognitive, psychosocial, disability and pharmaceutical domains, which together make up the Patient Frailty Index (pFI). We further explored the impact of socioeconomic factors on functional recovery using the Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation (WIMD). The outcome measures included duration of level 3 and level 2 care, duration of hospital stay, readmission and both short- and longer-term mortality. A total of 669 patients were included in the final analysis. A total of 224 (33.5%) of the patients were ‘frail’. They were more likely to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure and diabetes and to be in the lowest decile for deprivation. Frailty was not associated with either sex or advanced age. Patients deemed to be ‘frail’ had a longer stay in intensive care, required level 3 cardiovascular and respiratory support for longer and stayed longer in the hospital. They spent fewer days at home in the first 30 days, largely due to days requiring advanced cardiovascular support, and fewer days at home in the first year, with most days lost to patients who died in the first year following their surgery. A moderation analysis examined whether the WIMD modified the effect of frailty on recovery after cardiac surgery. The interaction term, after confirming there were no collinearity concerns, was not significant, either for DAOH30 or DAH365, indicating no evidence of moderation. Conclusions Short- and medium-term measures of good functional recovery were lower in ‘frail’ patients, and longer-term survival was also significantly reduced. An accumulation of deficits assessment of frailty, incorporating multiple domains, builds a more accurate picture of increasing vulnerability and can be acquired from patients’ electronic health records. In a surgical population that is increasingly comorbid, these findings should inform decisions on preoperative priority setting, prehabilitation, postoperative resources and discharge planning.
format Article
id doaj-art-1d24f8a9c11b4b34954a7c2bb85e79b6
institution DOAJ
issn 2047-0525
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Perioperative Medicine
spelling doaj-art-1d24f8a9c11b4b34954a7c2bb85e79b62025-08-20T03:15:09ZengBMCPerioperative Medicine2047-05252025-04-011411910.1186/s13741-025-00526-8The impact of frailty on functional recovery after cardiac surgery—a case control studyM. Abdelmonem0M. Elsayed1D. Awadallah2O. Don3R. H. Bennett4O. G. Mackay5S. Pookayil6C. Archer7M. Mahgoub8M. J. Bennett9Swansea Bay University Health BoardRoyal Glamorgan HospitalSwansea Bay University Health BoardUniversity Hospital of WalesCardiff Medical SchoolCardiff Medical SchoolSwansea Bay University Health BoardUniversity Hospital of WalesUniversity Hospital of WalesSwansea Bay University Health BoardAbstract Background Good functional recovery after cardiac surgery can be reported as ‘days alive and out of hospital’ in the first 30 days after a procedure (DAOH30) and ‘days at home’ in the first year (DAH365), which integrate several clinically important outcomes, including death, hospital length of stay, quality of recovery and hospital readmission. They depend on the preservation or early recovery of physiological and functional capacity, both of which may be lost in patients living with frailty. Case presentation We measured frailty with a multidimensional approach, incorporating 30 variables spanning comorbidity, sensory, cognitive, psychosocial, disability and pharmaceutical domains, which together make up the Patient Frailty Index (pFI). We further explored the impact of socioeconomic factors on functional recovery using the Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation (WIMD). The outcome measures included duration of level 3 and level 2 care, duration of hospital stay, readmission and both short- and longer-term mortality. A total of 669 patients were included in the final analysis. A total of 224 (33.5%) of the patients were ‘frail’. They were more likely to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure and diabetes and to be in the lowest decile for deprivation. Frailty was not associated with either sex or advanced age. Patients deemed to be ‘frail’ had a longer stay in intensive care, required level 3 cardiovascular and respiratory support for longer and stayed longer in the hospital. They spent fewer days at home in the first 30 days, largely due to days requiring advanced cardiovascular support, and fewer days at home in the first year, with most days lost to patients who died in the first year following their surgery. A moderation analysis examined whether the WIMD modified the effect of frailty on recovery after cardiac surgery. The interaction term, after confirming there were no collinearity concerns, was not significant, either for DAOH30 or DAH365, indicating no evidence of moderation. Conclusions Short- and medium-term measures of good functional recovery were lower in ‘frail’ patients, and longer-term survival was also significantly reduced. An accumulation of deficits assessment of frailty, incorporating multiple domains, builds a more accurate picture of increasing vulnerability and can be acquired from patients’ electronic health records. In a surgical population that is increasingly comorbid, these findings should inform decisions on preoperative priority setting, prehabilitation, postoperative resources and discharge planning.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-025-00526-8FrailtyFunctional recoverySocioeconomic deprivation
spellingShingle M. Abdelmonem
M. Elsayed
D. Awadallah
O. Don
R. H. Bennett
O. G. Mackay
S. Pookayil
C. Archer
M. Mahgoub
M. J. Bennett
The impact of frailty on functional recovery after cardiac surgery—a case control study
Perioperative Medicine
Frailty
Functional recovery
Socioeconomic deprivation
title The impact of frailty on functional recovery after cardiac surgery—a case control study
title_full The impact of frailty on functional recovery after cardiac surgery—a case control study
title_fullStr The impact of frailty on functional recovery after cardiac surgery—a case control study
title_full_unstemmed The impact of frailty on functional recovery after cardiac surgery—a case control study
title_short The impact of frailty on functional recovery after cardiac surgery—a case control study
title_sort impact of frailty on functional recovery after cardiac surgery a case control study
topic Frailty
Functional recovery
Socioeconomic deprivation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-025-00526-8
work_keys_str_mv AT mabdelmonem theimpactoffrailtyonfunctionalrecoveryaftercardiacsurgeryacasecontrolstudy
AT melsayed theimpactoffrailtyonfunctionalrecoveryaftercardiacsurgeryacasecontrolstudy
AT dawadallah theimpactoffrailtyonfunctionalrecoveryaftercardiacsurgeryacasecontrolstudy
AT odon theimpactoffrailtyonfunctionalrecoveryaftercardiacsurgeryacasecontrolstudy
AT rhbennett theimpactoffrailtyonfunctionalrecoveryaftercardiacsurgeryacasecontrolstudy
AT ogmackay theimpactoffrailtyonfunctionalrecoveryaftercardiacsurgeryacasecontrolstudy
AT spookayil theimpactoffrailtyonfunctionalrecoveryaftercardiacsurgeryacasecontrolstudy
AT carcher theimpactoffrailtyonfunctionalrecoveryaftercardiacsurgeryacasecontrolstudy
AT mmahgoub theimpactoffrailtyonfunctionalrecoveryaftercardiacsurgeryacasecontrolstudy
AT mjbennett theimpactoffrailtyonfunctionalrecoveryaftercardiacsurgeryacasecontrolstudy
AT mabdelmonem impactoffrailtyonfunctionalrecoveryaftercardiacsurgeryacasecontrolstudy
AT melsayed impactoffrailtyonfunctionalrecoveryaftercardiacsurgeryacasecontrolstudy
AT dawadallah impactoffrailtyonfunctionalrecoveryaftercardiacsurgeryacasecontrolstudy
AT odon impactoffrailtyonfunctionalrecoveryaftercardiacsurgeryacasecontrolstudy
AT rhbennett impactoffrailtyonfunctionalrecoveryaftercardiacsurgeryacasecontrolstudy
AT ogmackay impactoffrailtyonfunctionalrecoveryaftercardiacsurgeryacasecontrolstudy
AT spookayil impactoffrailtyonfunctionalrecoveryaftercardiacsurgeryacasecontrolstudy
AT carcher impactoffrailtyonfunctionalrecoveryaftercardiacsurgeryacasecontrolstudy
AT mmahgoub impactoffrailtyonfunctionalrecoveryaftercardiacsurgeryacasecontrolstudy
AT mjbennett impactoffrailtyonfunctionalrecoveryaftercardiacsurgeryacasecontrolstudy