Role of the State Administrative Court in Jurisdictional Disputes
This study provides an in-depth understanding of the jurisdictional dispute involving Fadel Muhammad and the DPD RI regarding the decision of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) of Jakarta. The results show that PTUN plays a crucial role in ensuring government accountability and protecting individ...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Indonesian |
| Published: |
Universitas Krisnadwipayana
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Begawan Abioso |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ejournal.hukumunkris.id/index.php/abioso/article/view/1117 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850182575988932608 |
|---|---|
| author | Enos Paselle Adji Puteri Mila Maharani Annisa Norsabila |
| author_facet | Enos Paselle Adji Puteri Mila Maharani Annisa Norsabila |
| author_sort | Enos Paselle |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study provides an in-depth understanding of the jurisdictional dispute involving Fadel Muhammad and the DPD RI regarding the decision of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) of Jakarta. The results show that PTUN plays a crucial role in ensuring government accountability and protecting individual rights, but the decision in this case also highlighted tensions between the executive, legislative, and judicial powers. While PTUN has the authority to adjudicate administrative disputes, decisions related to political matters, such as the dismissal of Fadel Muhammad, present complexities that need to be carefully managed to avoid destabilizing the constitutional order. One of the main challenges is the enforcement of PTUN’s decisions, which remains susceptible to non-compliance by the government, potentially leading to legal uncertainty and undermining the effectiveness of the legal system in Indonesia. Therefore, further reforms are needed to strengthen the administrative law system and the judiciary to ensure that PTUN decisions are implemented effectively and fairly, thus maintaining the stability of democracy and the constitutional order in Indonesia. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-1bfcdcb3951548dfb5917fb2d2220fc0 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1858-2990 2810-0727 |
| language | Indonesian |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | Universitas Krisnadwipayana |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Begawan Abioso |
| spelling | doaj-art-1bfcdcb3951548dfb5917fb2d2220fc02025-08-20T02:17:36ZindUniversitas KrisnadwipayanaBegawan Abioso1858-29902810-07272025-04-011529910510.37893/abioso.v15i2.11171117Role of the State Administrative Court in Jurisdictional DisputesEnos Paselle0Adji Puteri Mila Maharani1Annisa Norsabila2Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, IndonesiaUniversitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, IndonesiaUniversitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, IndonesiaThis study provides an in-depth understanding of the jurisdictional dispute involving Fadel Muhammad and the DPD RI regarding the decision of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) of Jakarta. The results show that PTUN plays a crucial role in ensuring government accountability and protecting individual rights, but the decision in this case also highlighted tensions between the executive, legislative, and judicial powers. While PTUN has the authority to adjudicate administrative disputes, decisions related to political matters, such as the dismissal of Fadel Muhammad, present complexities that need to be carefully managed to avoid destabilizing the constitutional order. One of the main challenges is the enforcement of PTUN’s decisions, which remains susceptible to non-compliance by the government, potentially leading to legal uncertainty and undermining the effectiveness of the legal system in Indonesia. Therefore, further reforms are needed to strengthen the administrative law system and the judiciary to ensure that PTUN decisions are implemented effectively and fairly, thus maintaining the stability of democracy and the constitutional order in Indonesia.https://ejournal.hukumunkris.id/index.php/abioso/article/view/1117administrative lawconstitutional order of indonesiaenforcement of decisionspolitical decisions |
| spellingShingle | Enos Paselle Adji Puteri Mila Maharani Annisa Norsabila Role of the State Administrative Court in Jurisdictional Disputes Begawan Abioso administrative law constitutional order of indonesia enforcement of decisions political decisions |
| title | Role of the State Administrative Court in Jurisdictional Disputes |
| title_full | Role of the State Administrative Court in Jurisdictional Disputes |
| title_fullStr | Role of the State Administrative Court in Jurisdictional Disputes |
| title_full_unstemmed | Role of the State Administrative Court in Jurisdictional Disputes |
| title_short | Role of the State Administrative Court in Jurisdictional Disputes |
| title_sort | role of the state administrative court in jurisdictional disputes |
| topic | administrative law constitutional order of indonesia enforcement of decisions political decisions |
| url | https://ejournal.hukumunkris.id/index.php/abioso/article/view/1117 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT enospaselle roleofthestateadministrativecourtinjurisdictionaldisputes AT adjiputerimilamaharani roleofthestateadministrativecourtinjurisdictionaldisputes AT annisanorsabila roleofthestateadministrativecourtinjurisdictionaldisputes |