Competitiveness Evaluation Method of Supersonic Civil Aircraft Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

As the demand for long-distance flights continues to increase, supersonic transport (SST) has once again become a hot research topic. However, in the conventional research on competitiveness of civil aircraft, because the flight speeds of various subsonic aircraft are relatively close, the influence...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiazheng He, Rui Pan, Wenyuan Cheng, Chenxin Guo, Zhijun Meng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Aerospace
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/12/1/37
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832589455281618944
author Jiazheng He
Rui Pan
Wenyuan Cheng
Chenxin Guo
Zhijun Meng
author_facet Jiazheng He
Rui Pan
Wenyuan Cheng
Chenxin Guo
Zhijun Meng
author_sort Jiazheng He
collection DOAJ
description As the demand for long-distance flights continues to increase, supersonic transport (SST) has once again become a hot research topic. However, in the conventional research on competitiveness of civil aircraft, because the flight speeds of various subsonic aircraft are relatively close, the influence of flight time on comfort is less considered. Therefore, there is a lack of evaluation methods considering time comfort to comprehensively evaluate supersonic and subsonic civil aircraft. This paper proposed an evaluation method for the competitiveness of supersonic civil aircraft based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Key indicators were selected to form a competitiveness evaluation model from the perspective of four criterion factors of economy, comfort, adaptability, and environment. Based on the key indicators, we have proposed a type of supersonic aircraft. The expected SST might have a much stronger market competitiveness compared to the Concorde, and it could provide a 43.5% improvement in passenger comfort over the Airbus A350 in long-distance flights. And the expected SST could outperform the Gulfstream G650 in economic feasibility. The evaluation method proposed in this paper could reflect the characteristics of supersonic civil aircraft and other subsonic aircraft, and effectively compare their competitiveness. This work can be used to evaluate the social acceptance of supersonic civil aircraft, help to optimize the overall design of supersonic civil aircraft, and provide reliable decision-making support for airline aircraft selection.
format Article
id doaj-art-1bf7c4b88b7243178979a3df67e1428c
institution Kabale University
issn 2226-4310
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Aerospace
spelling doaj-art-1bf7c4b88b7243178979a3df67e1428c2025-01-24T13:15:34ZengMDPI AGAerospace2226-43102025-01-011213710.3390/aerospace12010037Competitiveness Evaluation Method of Supersonic Civil Aircraft Based on Analytic Hierarchy ProcessJiazheng He0Rui Pan1Wenyuan Cheng2Chenxin Guo3Zhijun Meng4School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, ChinaAviation Industry Development Research Center of China, Beijing 100029, ChinaAviation Industry Development Research Center of China, Beijing 100029, ChinaAviation Industry Development Research Center of China, Beijing 100029, ChinaSchool of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, ChinaAs the demand for long-distance flights continues to increase, supersonic transport (SST) has once again become a hot research topic. However, in the conventional research on competitiveness of civil aircraft, because the flight speeds of various subsonic aircraft are relatively close, the influence of flight time on comfort is less considered. Therefore, there is a lack of evaluation methods considering time comfort to comprehensively evaluate supersonic and subsonic civil aircraft. This paper proposed an evaluation method for the competitiveness of supersonic civil aircraft based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Key indicators were selected to form a competitiveness evaluation model from the perspective of four criterion factors of economy, comfort, adaptability, and environment. Based on the key indicators, we have proposed a type of supersonic aircraft. The expected SST might have a much stronger market competitiveness compared to the Concorde, and it could provide a 43.5% improvement in passenger comfort over the Airbus A350 in long-distance flights. And the expected SST could outperform the Gulfstream G650 in economic feasibility. The evaluation method proposed in this paper could reflect the characteristics of supersonic civil aircraft and other subsonic aircraft, and effectively compare their competitiveness. This work can be used to evaluate the social acceptance of supersonic civil aircraft, help to optimize the overall design of supersonic civil aircraft, and provide reliable decision-making support for airline aircraft selection.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/12/1/37supersonic civil aircraftanalytic hierarchy processcompetitivenesssocial acceptance
spellingShingle Jiazheng He
Rui Pan
Wenyuan Cheng
Chenxin Guo
Zhijun Meng
Competitiveness Evaluation Method of Supersonic Civil Aircraft Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process
Aerospace
supersonic civil aircraft
analytic hierarchy process
competitiveness
social acceptance
title Competitiveness Evaluation Method of Supersonic Civil Aircraft Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process
title_full Competitiveness Evaluation Method of Supersonic Civil Aircraft Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process
title_fullStr Competitiveness Evaluation Method of Supersonic Civil Aircraft Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process
title_full_unstemmed Competitiveness Evaluation Method of Supersonic Civil Aircraft Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process
title_short Competitiveness Evaluation Method of Supersonic Civil Aircraft Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process
title_sort competitiveness evaluation method of supersonic civil aircraft based on analytic hierarchy process
topic supersonic civil aircraft
analytic hierarchy process
competitiveness
social acceptance
url https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/12/1/37
work_keys_str_mv AT jiazhenghe competitivenessevaluationmethodofsupersoniccivilaircraftbasedonanalytichierarchyprocess
AT ruipan competitivenessevaluationmethodofsupersoniccivilaircraftbasedonanalytichierarchyprocess
AT wenyuancheng competitivenessevaluationmethodofsupersoniccivilaircraftbasedonanalytichierarchyprocess
AT chenxinguo competitivenessevaluationmethodofsupersoniccivilaircraftbasedonanalytichierarchyprocess
AT zhijunmeng competitivenessevaluationmethodofsupersoniccivilaircraftbasedonanalytichierarchyprocess