Apexification with Calcium Hydroxide vs. Revascularization

Treatment of necrotic immature teeth has always been a real challenge for the clinician due to the open apex and weak root structure, which does not allow a conventional endodontic treatment. Several therapeutic options are possible to treat those teeth. Calcium hydroxide apexification is the oldest...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H. Boufdil, M. Mtalsi, S. El Arabi, B. Bousfiha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9861609
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832547620340367360
author H. Boufdil
M. Mtalsi
S. El Arabi
B. Bousfiha
author_facet H. Boufdil
M. Mtalsi
S. El Arabi
B. Bousfiha
author_sort H. Boufdil
collection DOAJ
description Treatment of necrotic immature teeth has always been a real challenge for the clinician due to the open apex and weak root structure, which does not allow a conventional endodontic treatment. Several therapeutic options are possible to treat those teeth. Calcium hydroxide apexification is the oldest and most studied therapeutic option, but it has some disadvantages, including the long term of treatment, the possibility of reinfection, and the weakness of the wall. To solve these problems, several authors recommend the revascularization technique. This therapy allows the continuation of root edification with apical closure and thickening of the walls. The aim of our work is to compare the two therapeutic procedures, apexification with calcium hydroxide and revascularization, through a clinical case treated and followed up for 24 months at the pediatric dentistry department in Casablanca, Morocco.
format Article
id doaj-art-1bece9b5e9404f16943a2f6e1b3c456e
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-6447
2090-6455
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Case Reports in Dentistry
spelling doaj-art-1bece9b5e9404f16943a2f6e1b3c456e2025-02-03T06:43:51ZengWileyCase Reports in Dentistry2090-64472090-64552020-01-01202010.1155/2020/98616099861609Apexification with Calcium Hydroxide vs. RevascularizationH. Boufdil0M. Mtalsi1S. El Arabi2B. Bousfiha3Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hassan II University of Casablanca, MoroccoDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hassan II University of Casablanca, MoroccoDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hassan II University of Casablanca, MoroccoDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hassan II University of Casablanca, MoroccoTreatment of necrotic immature teeth has always been a real challenge for the clinician due to the open apex and weak root structure, which does not allow a conventional endodontic treatment. Several therapeutic options are possible to treat those teeth. Calcium hydroxide apexification is the oldest and most studied therapeutic option, but it has some disadvantages, including the long term of treatment, the possibility of reinfection, and the weakness of the wall. To solve these problems, several authors recommend the revascularization technique. This therapy allows the continuation of root edification with apical closure and thickening of the walls. The aim of our work is to compare the two therapeutic procedures, apexification with calcium hydroxide and revascularization, through a clinical case treated and followed up for 24 months at the pediatric dentistry department in Casablanca, Morocco.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9861609
spellingShingle H. Boufdil
M. Mtalsi
S. El Arabi
B. Bousfiha
Apexification with Calcium Hydroxide vs. Revascularization
Case Reports in Dentistry
title Apexification with Calcium Hydroxide vs. Revascularization
title_full Apexification with Calcium Hydroxide vs. Revascularization
title_fullStr Apexification with Calcium Hydroxide vs. Revascularization
title_full_unstemmed Apexification with Calcium Hydroxide vs. Revascularization
title_short Apexification with Calcium Hydroxide vs. Revascularization
title_sort apexification with calcium hydroxide vs revascularization
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9861609
work_keys_str_mv AT hboufdil apexificationwithcalciumhydroxidevsrevascularization
AT mmtalsi apexificationwithcalciumhydroxidevsrevascularization
AT selarabi apexificationwithcalciumhydroxidevsrevascularization
AT bbousfiha apexificationwithcalciumhydroxidevsrevascularization