Non-operative versus operative treatment of suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures: protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

Introduction Surgery is widely recognised as the treatment of choice for suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures, because of the assumption that these injuries yield instability of the ankle joint. Stability assessment of ankle fractures using weightbearing radiographs is now used regularly to guide the tr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wender Figved, Frede Frihagen, Jan Erik Madsen, Ola Saatvedt, Martin Riiser, Marius Molund, Håvard Furunes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2024-01-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/1/e075122.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850199473859330048
author Wender Figved
Frede Frihagen
Jan Erik Madsen
Ola Saatvedt
Martin Riiser
Marius Molund
Håvard Furunes
author_facet Wender Figved
Frede Frihagen
Jan Erik Madsen
Ola Saatvedt
Martin Riiser
Marius Molund
Håvard Furunes
author_sort Wender Figved
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Surgery is widely recognised as the treatment of choice for suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures, because of the assumption that these injuries yield instability of the ankle joint. Stability assessment of ankle fractures using weightbearing radiographs is now used regularly to guide the treatment of transsyndesmotic and infrasyndesmotic ankle fractures. Patients with a congruent ankle joint on weightbearing radiographs can be treated non-operatively with excellent results. Weightbearing radiographs are, however, rarely performed on suprasyndesmotic fractures due to the assumed unstable nature of these fractures. If weightbearing radiographs can be used to identify suprasyndesmotic fractures suitable for non-operative treatment, we may save patients from the potential burdens of surgery.Our aim is to compare the efficacy of operative and non-operative treatment of patients with suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures that reduce on weightbearing radiographs.Methods and analysis A non-inferiority randomised controlled trial involving 120 patients will be conducted. A total of 120 patients with suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures with an initial radiographic medial clear space of <7 mm will be subjected to weightbearing radiographs. If the tibio-talar joint is completely reduced, we will randomise in a 1:1 ratio to either operative treatment including reduction and fixation of the syndesmosis or non-operative treatment with an orthosis. The primary study outcome is patient-reported ankle function and symptoms as measured by the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score at 2-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes include the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire, range of motion, radiographic results and rates of adverse events.Ethics and dissemination The Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research South East, group A (permission number: 169307), has granted ethics approval. The results of this study will provide valuable insights for developing future diagnostic and treatment strategies for a common fracture type. The findings will be shared through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at conferences.Trial registration number NCT04615650.
format Article
id doaj-art-1bdf6daedd4e45e7b3af349df231d5ac
institution OA Journals
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-1bdf6daedd4e45e7b3af349df231d5ac2025-08-20T02:12:37ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552024-01-0114110.1136/bmjopen-2023-075122Non-operative versus operative treatment of suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures: protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trialWender Figved0Frede Frihagen1Jan Erik Madsen2Ola Saatvedt3Martin Riiser4Marius Molund5Håvard Furunes6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bærum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Bærum, NorwayDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Østfold Hospital Trust, Sarpsborg, NorwayUniversity of Oslo Faculty of Medicine, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Innlandet Hospital Trust Gjøvik Hospital, Gjovik, NorwayUniversity of Oslo Faculty of Medicine, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Østfold Hospital Trust, Sarpsborg, NorwayDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Innlandet Hospital Trust Gjøvik Hospital, Gjovik, NorwayIntroduction Surgery is widely recognised as the treatment of choice for suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures, because of the assumption that these injuries yield instability of the ankle joint. Stability assessment of ankle fractures using weightbearing radiographs is now used regularly to guide the treatment of transsyndesmotic and infrasyndesmotic ankle fractures. Patients with a congruent ankle joint on weightbearing radiographs can be treated non-operatively with excellent results. Weightbearing radiographs are, however, rarely performed on suprasyndesmotic fractures due to the assumed unstable nature of these fractures. If weightbearing radiographs can be used to identify suprasyndesmotic fractures suitable for non-operative treatment, we may save patients from the potential burdens of surgery.Our aim is to compare the efficacy of operative and non-operative treatment of patients with suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures that reduce on weightbearing radiographs.Methods and analysis A non-inferiority randomised controlled trial involving 120 patients will be conducted. A total of 120 patients with suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures with an initial radiographic medial clear space of <7 mm will be subjected to weightbearing radiographs. If the tibio-talar joint is completely reduced, we will randomise in a 1:1 ratio to either operative treatment including reduction and fixation of the syndesmosis or non-operative treatment with an orthosis. The primary study outcome is patient-reported ankle function and symptoms as measured by the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score at 2-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes include the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire, range of motion, radiographic results and rates of adverse events.Ethics and dissemination The Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research South East, group A (permission number: 169307), has granted ethics approval. The results of this study will provide valuable insights for developing future diagnostic and treatment strategies for a common fracture type. The findings will be shared through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at conferences.Trial registration number NCT04615650.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/1/e075122.full
spellingShingle Wender Figved
Frede Frihagen
Jan Erik Madsen
Ola Saatvedt
Martin Riiser
Marius Molund
Håvard Furunes
Non-operative versus operative treatment of suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures: protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial
BMJ Open
title Non-operative versus operative treatment of suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures: protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial
title_full Non-operative versus operative treatment of suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures: protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Non-operative versus operative treatment of suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures: protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Non-operative versus operative treatment of suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures: protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial
title_short Non-operative versus operative treatment of suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures: protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial
title_sort non operative versus operative treatment of suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures protocol for a prospective multicentre randomised controlled trial
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/1/e075122.full
work_keys_str_mv AT wenderfigved nonoperativeversusoperativetreatmentofsuprasyndesmoticanklefracturesprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fredefrihagen nonoperativeversusoperativetreatmentofsuprasyndesmoticanklefracturesprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT janerikmadsen nonoperativeversusoperativetreatmentofsuprasyndesmoticanklefracturesprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT olasaatvedt nonoperativeversusoperativetreatmentofsuprasyndesmoticanklefracturesprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT martinriiser nonoperativeversusoperativetreatmentofsuprasyndesmoticanklefracturesprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mariusmolund nonoperativeversusoperativetreatmentofsuprasyndesmoticanklefracturesprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT havardfurunes nonoperativeversusoperativetreatmentofsuprasyndesmoticanklefracturesprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial