Integrating Videoconferencing Therapist Guidance Into Stepped Care Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Child and Adolescent Anxiety: Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundSelf-guided internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) achieves greater reach than ICBT delivered with therapist guidance, but demonstrates poorer engagement and fewer clinical benefits. Alternative models of care are required that promote engagement and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sonja March, Susan H Spence, Larry Myers, Martelle Ford, Genevieve Smith, Caroline L Donovan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2025-01-01
Series:JMIR Mental Health
Online Access:https://mental.jmir.org/2025/1/e57405
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832591150806990848
author Sonja March
Susan H Spence
Larry Myers
Martelle Ford
Genevieve Smith
Caroline L Donovan
author_facet Sonja March
Susan H Spence
Larry Myers
Martelle Ford
Genevieve Smith
Caroline L Donovan
author_sort Sonja March
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundSelf-guided internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) achieves greater reach than ICBT delivered with therapist guidance, but demonstrates poorer engagement and fewer clinical benefits. Alternative models of care are required that promote engagement and are effective, accessible, and scalable. ObjectiveThis randomized trial evaluated whether a stepped care approach to ICBT using therapist guidance via videoconferencing for the step-up component (ICBT-SC[VC]) is noninferior to ICBT with full therapist delivery by videoconferencing (ICBT-TG[VC]) for child and adolescent anxiety. MethodsParticipants included 137 Australian children and adolescents aged 7 to 17 years (male: n=61, 44.5%) with a primary anxiety disorder who were recruited from participants presenting to the BRAVE Online website. This noninferiority randomized trial compared ICBT-SC[VC] to an ICBT-TG[VC] program, with assessments conducted at baseline, 12 weeks, and 9 months after treatment commencement. All ICBT-TG[VC] participants received therapist guidance (videoconferencing) after each session for all 10 sessions. All ICBT-SC[VC] participants completed the first 5 sessions online without therapist guidance. If they demonstrated response to treatment after 5 sessions (defined as reductions in anxiety symptoms to the nonclinical range), they continued sessions without therapist guidance. If they did not respond, participants were stepped up to receive supplemental therapist guidance (videoconferencing) for the remaining sessions. The measures included a clinical diagnostic interview (Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule) with clinician-rated severity rating as the primary outcome and parent- and child-reported web-based surveys assessing anxiety and anxiety-related interference (secondary outcomes). ResultsAlthough there were no substantial differences between the treatment conditions on primary and most secondary outcome measures, the noninferiority of ICBT-SC[VC] compared to ICBT-TG[VC] could not be determined. Significant clinical benefits were evident for participants in both treatments, although this was significantly higher for the ICBT-TG[VC] participants. Of the 89 participants (38 in ICBT-SC[VC] and 51 in ICBT-TG[VC]) who remained in the study, 26 (68%) in ICBT-SC[VC] and 45 (88%) in ICBT-TG[VC] were free of their primary anxiety diagnosis by the 9-month follow-up. For the intention-to-treat sample (N=137), 41% (27/66) ICBT-SC[VC], and 69% (49/71) ICBT-TG[VC] participants were free of their primary anxiety diagnosis. Therapy compliance was lower for the ICBT-SC[VC] participants (mean 7.39, SD 3.44 sessions) than for the ICBT-TG[VC] participants (mean 8.73, SD 3.08 sessions), although treatment satisfaction was moderate to high in both conditions. ConclusionsThis study provided further support for the benefits of low-intensity ICBT for children and adolescents with a primary anxiety disorder and highlighted the excellent treatment outcomes that can be achieved through therapist-guided ICBT delivered via videoconferencing. Although noninferiority of the stepped care adaptive approach could not be determined, it was acceptable to families, produced good outcomes, and could assist in increasing access to evidence-based care. Trial RegistrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12618001418268; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12618001418268
format Article
id doaj-art-1bce4afcb41e4fb5a8c0b89772a96b8b
institution Kabale University
issn 2368-7959
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Mental Health
spelling doaj-art-1bce4afcb41e4fb5a8c0b89772a96b8b2025-01-22T20:30:57ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Mental Health2368-79592025-01-0112e5740510.2196/57405Integrating Videoconferencing Therapist Guidance Into Stepped Care Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Child and Adolescent Anxiety: Noninferiority Randomized Controlled TrialSonja Marchhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8425-7126Susan H Spencehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7022-6676Larry Myershttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2956-3224Martelle Fordhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6564-8252Genevieve Smithhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1366-5071Caroline L Donovanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6380-635X BackgroundSelf-guided internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) achieves greater reach than ICBT delivered with therapist guidance, but demonstrates poorer engagement and fewer clinical benefits. Alternative models of care are required that promote engagement and are effective, accessible, and scalable. ObjectiveThis randomized trial evaluated whether a stepped care approach to ICBT using therapist guidance via videoconferencing for the step-up component (ICBT-SC[VC]) is noninferior to ICBT with full therapist delivery by videoconferencing (ICBT-TG[VC]) for child and adolescent anxiety. MethodsParticipants included 137 Australian children and adolescents aged 7 to 17 years (male: n=61, 44.5%) with a primary anxiety disorder who were recruited from participants presenting to the BRAVE Online website. This noninferiority randomized trial compared ICBT-SC[VC] to an ICBT-TG[VC] program, with assessments conducted at baseline, 12 weeks, and 9 months after treatment commencement. All ICBT-TG[VC] participants received therapist guidance (videoconferencing) after each session for all 10 sessions. All ICBT-SC[VC] participants completed the first 5 sessions online without therapist guidance. If they demonstrated response to treatment after 5 sessions (defined as reductions in anxiety symptoms to the nonclinical range), they continued sessions without therapist guidance. If they did not respond, participants were stepped up to receive supplemental therapist guidance (videoconferencing) for the remaining sessions. The measures included a clinical diagnostic interview (Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule) with clinician-rated severity rating as the primary outcome and parent- and child-reported web-based surveys assessing anxiety and anxiety-related interference (secondary outcomes). ResultsAlthough there were no substantial differences between the treatment conditions on primary and most secondary outcome measures, the noninferiority of ICBT-SC[VC] compared to ICBT-TG[VC] could not be determined. Significant clinical benefits were evident for participants in both treatments, although this was significantly higher for the ICBT-TG[VC] participants. Of the 89 participants (38 in ICBT-SC[VC] and 51 in ICBT-TG[VC]) who remained in the study, 26 (68%) in ICBT-SC[VC] and 45 (88%) in ICBT-TG[VC] were free of their primary anxiety diagnosis by the 9-month follow-up. For the intention-to-treat sample (N=137), 41% (27/66) ICBT-SC[VC], and 69% (49/71) ICBT-TG[VC] participants were free of their primary anxiety diagnosis. Therapy compliance was lower for the ICBT-SC[VC] participants (mean 7.39, SD 3.44 sessions) than for the ICBT-TG[VC] participants (mean 8.73, SD 3.08 sessions), although treatment satisfaction was moderate to high in both conditions. ConclusionsThis study provided further support for the benefits of low-intensity ICBT for children and adolescents with a primary anxiety disorder and highlighted the excellent treatment outcomes that can be achieved through therapist-guided ICBT delivered via videoconferencing. Although noninferiority of the stepped care adaptive approach could not be determined, it was acceptable to families, produced good outcomes, and could assist in increasing access to evidence-based care. Trial RegistrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12618001418268; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12618001418268https://mental.jmir.org/2025/1/e57405
spellingShingle Sonja March
Susan H Spence
Larry Myers
Martelle Ford
Genevieve Smith
Caroline L Donovan
Integrating Videoconferencing Therapist Guidance Into Stepped Care Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Child and Adolescent Anxiety: Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial
JMIR Mental Health
title Integrating Videoconferencing Therapist Guidance Into Stepped Care Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Child and Adolescent Anxiety: Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Integrating Videoconferencing Therapist Guidance Into Stepped Care Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Child and Adolescent Anxiety: Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Integrating Videoconferencing Therapist Guidance Into Stepped Care Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Child and Adolescent Anxiety: Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Integrating Videoconferencing Therapist Guidance Into Stepped Care Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Child and Adolescent Anxiety: Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Integrating Videoconferencing Therapist Guidance Into Stepped Care Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Child and Adolescent Anxiety: Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort integrating videoconferencing therapist guidance into stepped care internet delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for child and adolescent anxiety noninferiority randomized controlled trial
url https://mental.jmir.org/2025/1/e57405
work_keys_str_mv AT sonjamarch integratingvideoconferencingtherapistguidanceintosteppedcareinternetdeliveredcognitivebehavioraltherapyforchildandadolescentanxietynoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT susanhspence integratingvideoconferencingtherapistguidanceintosteppedcareinternetdeliveredcognitivebehavioraltherapyforchildandadolescentanxietynoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT larrymyers integratingvideoconferencingtherapistguidanceintosteppedcareinternetdeliveredcognitivebehavioraltherapyforchildandadolescentanxietynoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT martelleford integratingvideoconferencingtherapistguidanceintosteppedcareinternetdeliveredcognitivebehavioraltherapyforchildandadolescentanxietynoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT genevievesmith integratingvideoconferencingtherapistguidanceintosteppedcareinternetdeliveredcognitivebehavioraltherapyforchildandadolescentanxietynoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT carolineldonovan integratingvideoconferencingtherapistguidanceintosteppedcareinternetdeliveredcognitivebehavioraltherapyforchildandadolescentanxietynoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial