Investigating BLS instructors’ ability to evaluate CPR performance: focus on compression depth, rate, and recoil
Abstract Background Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) presents significant challenges with low survival rates, emphasizing the need for effective bystander CPR training. In Basic Life Support (BLS) training, the role of instructors is pivotal as they assess and correct learners’ cardiopulmonary...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2025-01-01
|
Series: | BMC Emergency Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01162-z |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832571912226603008 |
---|---|
author | Shih-Jhan Lin Chih-Jan Chang Shao-Chung Chu Ying-Hsin Chang Ming-Yuan Hong Po-Chang Huang Chia-Lung Kao Chih-Hsien Chi |
author_facet | Shih-Jhan Lin Chih-Jan Chang Shao-Chung Chu Ying-Hsin Chang Ming-Yuan Hong Po-Chang Huang Chia-Lung Kao Chih-Hsien Chi |
author_sort | Shih-Jhan Lin |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) presents significant challenges with low survival rates, emphasizing the need for effective bystander CPR training. In Basic Life Support (BLS) training, the role of instructors is pivotal as they assess and correct learners’ cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) techniques to ensure proficiency in life-saving skills. This study evaluates the concordance between CPR quality assessments by Basic Life Support (BLS) instructors and those determined through Quantitative CPR (QCPR) devices, utilizing data from BLS courses conducted at National Cheng Kung University Hospital from October 2017 to April 2018. Methods The study analyzed existing data from BLS courses, comparing CPR quality assessments made by instructors with those recorded by QCPR devices. Key metrics such as chest compression speed, depth, and recoil were examined to identify the degree of consistency between human and automated evaluations. Results In this study, CPR performance was analyzed using QCPR devices and BLS instructors across metrics like speed, depth, and recoil. Employing the Cohen kappa statistic revealed moderate to low interrater reliability, the kappa value is 0.65 (95% C.I. 0.65–0.65) for depth, 0.56 (95% C.I. 0.33–0.79) for speed, and 0.50 (95% C.I.0.28–0.71) for recoil. Correlation analysis visualized in a heatmap indicated a higher consistency in depth evaluations (correlation coefficient = 0.7) compared to speed and recoil, suggesting a need for improved alignment in CPR training assessments. Conclusions The study underscores the importance of refining CPR training methods and adopting advanced technological aids to enhance the reliability of CPR skill assessments. By improving the accuracy of these evaluations, the training can be better tailored to increase the effectiveness of life-saving interventions, potentially boosting survival rates in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest scenarios. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-1b835980e7d647a1873ac4ac5cbe6132 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1471-227X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Emergency Medicine |
spelling | doaj-art-1b835980e7d647a1873ac4ac5cbe61322025-02-02T12:11:43ZengBMCBMC Emergency Medicine1471-227X2025-01-012511810.1186/s12873-024-01162-zInvestigating BLS instructors’ ability to evaluate CPR performance: focus on compression depth, rate, and recoilShih-Jhan Lin0Chih-Jan Chang1Shao-Chung Chu2Ying-Hsin Chang3Ming-Yuan Hong4Po-Chang Huang5Chia-Lung Kao6Chih-Hsien Chi7Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung UniversityDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung UniversityDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung UniversityDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung UniversityDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung UniversityDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung UniversityDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung UniversityDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung UniversityAbstract Background Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) presents significant challenges with low survival rates, emphasizing the need for effective bystander CPR training. In Basic Life Support (BLS) training, the role of instructors is pivotal as they assess and correct learners’ cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) techniques to ensure proficiency in life-saving skills. This study evaluates the concordance between CPR quality assessments by Basic Life Support (BLS) instructors and those determined through Quantitative CPR (QCPR) devices, utilizing data from BLS courses conducted at National Cheng Kung University Hospital from October 2017 to April 2018. Methods The study analyzed existing data from BLS courses, comparing CPR quality assessments made by instructors with those recorded by QCPR devices. Key metrics such as chest compression speed, depth, and recoil were examined to identify the degree of consistency between human and automated evaluations. Results In this study, CPR performance was analyzed using QCPR devices and BLS instructors across metrics like speed, depth, and recoil. Employing the Cohen kappa statistic revealed moderate to low interrater reliability, the kappa value is 0.65 (95% C.I. 0.65–0.65) for depth, 0.56 (95% C.I. 0.33–0.79) for speed, and 0.50 (95% C.I.0.28–0.71) for recoil. Correlation analysis visualized in a heatmap indicated a higher consistency in depth evaluations (correlation coefficient = 0.7) compared to speed and recoil, suggesting a need for improved alignment in CPR training assessments. Conclusions The study underscores the importance of refining CPR training methods and adopting advanced technological aids to enhance the reliability of CPR skill assessments. By improving the accuracy of these evaluations, the training can be better tailored to increase the effectiveness of life-saving interventions, potentially boosting survival rates in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest scenarios.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01162-zBasic Life Support instructorsCPR quality assessmentsCorrelation analysis |
spellingShingle | Shih-Jhan Lin Chih-Jan Chang Shao-Chung Chu Ying-Hsin Chang Ming-Yuan Hong Po-Chang Huang Chia-Lung Kao Chih-Hsien Chi Investigating BLS instructors’ ability to evaluate CPR performance: focus on compression depth, rate, and recoil BMC Emergency Medicine Basic Life Support instructors CPR quality assessments Correlation analysis |
title | Investigating BLS instructors’ ability to evaluate CPR performance: focus on compression depth, rate, and recoil |
title_full | Investigating BLS instructors’ ability to evaluate CPR performance: focus on compression depth, rate, and recoil |
title_fullStr | Investigating BLS instructors’ ability to evaluate CPR performance: focus on compression depth, rate, and recoil |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigating BLS instructors’ ability to evaluate CPR performance: focus on compression depth, rate, and recoil |
title_short | Investigating BLS instructors’ ability to evaluate CPR performance: focus on compression depth, rate, and recoil |
title_sort | investigating bls instructors ability to evaluate cpr performance focus on compression depth rate and recoil |
topic | Basic Life Support instructors CPR quality assessments Correlation analysis |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01162-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shihjhanlin investigatingblsinstructorsabilitytoevaluatecprperformancefocusoncompressiondepthrateandrecoil AT chihjanchang investigatingblsinstructorsabilitytoevaluatecprperformancefocusoncompressiondepthrateandrecoil AT shaochungchu investigatingblsinstructorsabilitytoevaluatecprperformancefocusoncompressiondepthrateandrecoil AT yinghsinchang investigatingblsinstructorsabilitytoevaluatecprperformancefocusoncompressiondepthrateandrecoil AT mingyuanhong investigatingblsinstructorsabilitytoevaluatecprperformancefocusoncompressiondepthrateandrecoil AT pochanghuang investigatingblsinstructorsabilitytoevaluatecprperformancefocusoncompressiondepthrateandrecoil AT chialungkao investigatingblsinstructorsabilitytoevaluatecprperformancefocusoncompressiondepthrateandrecoil AT chihhsienchi investigatingblsinstructorsabilitytoevaluatecprperformancefocusoncompressiondepthrateandrecoil |