Investigating BLS instructors’ ability to evaluate CPR performance: focus on compression depth, rate, and recoil

Abstract Background Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) presents significant challenges with low survival rates, emphasizing the need for effective bystander CPR training. In Basic Life Support (BLS) training, the role of instructors is pivotal as they assess and correct learners’ cardiopulmonary...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shih-Jhan Lin, Chih-Jan Chang, Shao-Chung Chu, Ying-Hsin Chang, Ming-Yuan Hong, Po-Chang Huang, Chia-Lung Kao, Chih-Hsien Chi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01162-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832571912226603008
author Shih-Jhan Lin
Chih-Jan Chang
Shao-Chung Chu
Ying-Hsin Chang
Ming-Yuan Hong
Po-Chang Huang
Chia-Lung Kao
Chih-Hsien Chi
author_facet Shih-Jhan Lin
Chih-Jan Chang
Shao-Chung Chu
Ying-Hsin Chang
Ming-Yuan Hong
Po-Chang Huang
Chia-Lung Kao
Chih-Hsien Chi
author_sort Shih-Jhan Lin
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) presents significant challenges with low survival rates, emphasizing the need for effective bystander CPR training. In Basic Life Support (BLS) training, the role of instructors is pivotal as they assess and correct learners’ cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) techniques to ensure proficiency in life-saving skills. This study evaluates the concordance between CPR quality assessments by Basic Life Support (BLS) instructors and those determined through Quantitative CPR (QCPR) devices, utilizing data from BLS courses conducted at National Cheng Kung University Hospital from October 2017 to April 2018. Methods The study analyzed existing data from BLS courses, comparing CPR quality assessments made by instructors with those recorded by QCPR devices. Key metrics such as chest compression speed, depth, and recoil were examined to identify the degree of consistency between human and automated evaluations. Results In this study, CPR performance was analyzed using QCPR devices and BLS instructors across metrics like speed, depth, and recoil. Employing the Cohen kappa statistic revealed moderate to low interrater reliability, the kappa value is 0.65 (95% C.I. 0.65–0.65) for depth, 0.56 (95% C.I. 0.33–0.79) for speed, and 0.50 (95% C.I.0.28–0.71) for recoil. Correlation analysis visualized in a heatmap indicated a higher consistency in depth evaluations (correlation coefficient = 0.7) compared to speed and recoil, suggesting a need for improved alignment in CPR training assessments. Conclusions The study underscores the importance of refining CPR training methods and adopting advanced technological aids to enhance the reliability of CPR skill assessments. By improving the accuracy of these evaluations, the training can be better tailored to increase the effectiveness of life-saving interventions, potentially boosting survival rates in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest scenarios.
format Article
id doaj-art-1b835980e7d647a1873ac4ac5cbe6132
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-227X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj-art-1b835980e7d647a1873ac4ac5cbe61322025-02-02T12:11:43ZengBMCBMC Emergency Medicine1471-227X2025-01-012511810.1186/s12873-024-01162-zInvestigating BLS instructors’ ability to evaluate CPR performance: focus on compression depth, rate, and recoilShih-Jhan Lin0Chih-Jan Chang1Shao-Chung Chu2Ying-Hsin Chang3Ming-Yuan Hong4Po-Chang Huang5Chia-Lung Kao6Chih-Hsien Chi7Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung UniversityDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung UniversityDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung UniversityDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung UniversityDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung UniversityDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung UniversityDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung UniversityDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung UniversityAbstract Background Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) presents significant challenges with low survival rates, emphasizing the need for effective bystander CPR training. In Basic Life Support (BLS) training, the role of instructors is pivotal as they assess and correct learners’ cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) techniques to ensure proficiency in life-saving skills. This study evaluates the concordance between CPR quality assessments by Basic Life Support (BLS) instructors and those determined through Quantitative CPR (QCPR) devices, utilizing data from BLS courses conducted at National Cheng Kung University Hospital from October 2017 to April 2018. Methods The study analyzed existing data from BLS courses, comparing CPR quality assessments made by instructors with those recorded by QCPR devices. Key metrics such as chest compression speed, depth, and recoil were examined to identify the degree of consistency between human and automated evaluations. Results In this study, CPR performance was analyzed using QCPR devices and BLS instructors across metrics like speed, depth, and recoil. Employing the Cohen kappa statistic revealed moderate to low interrater reliability, the kappa value is 0.65 (95% C.I. 0.65–0.65) for depth, 0.56 (95% C.I. 0.33–0.79) for speed, and 0.50 (95% C.I.0.28–0.71) for recoil. Correlation analysis visualized in a heatmap indicated a higher consistency in depth evaluations (correlation coefficient = 0.7) compared to speed and recoil, suggesting a need for improved alignment in CPR training assessments. Conclusions The study underscores the importance of refining CPR training methods and adopting advanced technological aids to enhance the reliability of CPR skill assessments. By improving the accuracy of these evaluations, the training can be better tailored to increase the effectiveness of life-saving interventions, potentially boosting survival rates in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest scenarios.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01162-zBasic Life Support instructorsCPR quality assessmentsCorrelation analysis
spellingShingle Shih-Jhan Lin
Chih-Jan Chang
Shao-Chung Chu
Ying-Hsin Chang
Ming-Yuan Hong
Po-Chang Huang
Chia-Lung Kao
Chih-Hsien Chi
Investigating BLS instructors’ ability to evaluate CPR performance: focus on compression depth, rate, and recoil
BMC Emergency Medicine
Basic Life Support instructors
CPR quality assessments
Correlation analysis
title Investigating BLS instructors’ ability to evaluate CPR performance: focus on compression depth, rate, and recoil
title_full Investigating BLS instructors’ ability to evaluate CPR performance: focus on compression depth, rate, and recoil
title_fullStr Investigating BLS instructors’ ability to evaluate CPR performance: focus on compression depth, rate, and recoil
title_full_unstemmed Investigating BLS instructors’ ability to evaluate CPR performance: focus on compression depth, rate, and recoil
title_short Investigating BLS instructors’ ability to evaluate CPR performance: focus on compression depth, rate, and recoil
title_sort investigating bls instructors ability to evaluate cpr performance focus on compression depth rate and recoil
topic Basic Life Support instructors
CPR quality assessments
Correlation analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01162-z
work_keys_str_mv AT shihjhanlin investigatingblsinstructorsabilitytoevaluatecprperformancefocusoncompressiondepthrateandrecoil
AT chihjanchang investigatingblsinstructorsabilitytoevaluatecprperformancefocusoncompressiondepthrateandrecoil
AT shaochungchu investigatingblsinstructorsabilitytoevaluatecprperformancefocusoncompressiondepthrateandrecoil
AT yinghsinchang investigatingblsinstructorsabilitytoevaluatecprperformancefocusoncompressiondepthrateandrecoil
AT mingyuanhong investigatingblsinstructorsabilitytoevaluatecprperformancefocusoncompressiondepthrateandrecoil
AT pochanghuang investigatingblsinstructorsabilitytoevaluatecprperformancefocusoncompressiondepthrateandrecoil
AT chialungkao investigatingblsinstructorsabilitytoevaluatecprperformancefocusoncompressiondepthrateandrecoil
AT chihhsienchi investigatingblsinstructorsabilitytoevaluatecprperformancefocusoncompressiondepthrateandrecoil