Affordances are Signs
Peirce and Whitehead share a common project: to restrict the over-extension of reductionism, to show how matter must be sensate and to create an ontology of process and subjectivity. This article claims that biosemiotics can assist this project. Moreover, it shows that the concept of affordance is a...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | John Pickering |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Paderborn University: Media Systems and Media Organisation Research Group
2008-07-01
|
| Series: | tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/59 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
HEIDEGGER’S EQUIPMENT VS. GIBSON’S AFFORDANCES. WHY THEY DIFFER AND HOW THEY ARTICULATE
by: Gunnar DECLERCK
Published: (2021-10-01) -
Should there be biomolecular pragmatics?
by: Suren T. Zolyan
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Book Review: Signs of Science - Linguistics meets Biology
by: Robert Prinz
Published: (2011-06-01) -
Biosemiotics: Communication and Causation (Information included)
by: Juan Ramon Álvarez
Published: (2009-11-01) -
Perceiving the affordance of interceptability for another
by: Samruddhi Damle, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01)