Hybrid Carbon Fibers/Carbon Nanotubes Structures for Next Generation Polymeric Composites
Pitch-based carbon fibers are commonly used to produce polymeric carbon fiber structural composites. Several investigations have reported different methods for dispersing and subsequently aligning carbon nanotubes (CNTs) as a filler to reinforce polymer matrix. The significant difficulty in dispersi...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2010-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Nanotechnology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/860178 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832559398757597184 |
---|---|
author | M. Al-Haik C. C. Luhrs M. M. Reda Taha A. K. Roy L. Dai J. Phillips S. Doorn |
author_facet | M. Al-Haik C. C. Luhrs M. M. Reda Taha A. K. Roy L. Dai J. Phillips S. Doorn |
author_sort | M. Al-Haik |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Pitch-based carbon fibers are commonly used to produce polymeric carbon fiber structural composites. Several investigations have reported different methods for dispersing and subsequently aligning carbon nanotubes (CNTs) as a filler to reinforce polymer matrix. The significant difficulty in dispersing CNTs suggested the controlled-growth of CNTs on surfaces where they are needed. Here we compare between two techniques for depositing the catalyst iron used toward growing CNTs on pitch-based carbon fiber surfaces. Electrochemical deposition of iron using pulse voltametry is compared to DC magnetron iron sputtering. Carbon nanostructures growth was performed using a thermal CVD system. Characterization for comparison between both techniques was compared via SEM, TEM, and Raman spectroscopy analysis. It is shown that while both techniques were successful to grow CNTs on the carbon fiber surfaces, iron sputtering technique was capable of producing more uniform distribution of iron catalyst and thus multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) compared to MWCNTs grown using the electrochemical deposition of iron. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-1ad7349e6007492b8c730848c419663c |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1687-9503 1687-9511 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Nanotechnology |
spelling | doaj-art-1ad7349e6007492b8c730848c419663c2025-02-03T01:30:11ZengWileyJournal of Nanotechnology1687-95031687-95112010-01-01201010.1155/2010/860178860178Hybrid Carbon Fibers/Carbon Nanotubes Structures for Next Generation Polymeric CompositesM. Al-Haik0C. C. Luhrs1M. M. Reda Taha2A. K. Roy3L. Dai4J. Phillips5S. Doorn6Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USADepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USADepartment of Civil Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USAAFRL/RXBT Thermal Sciences and Materials Branch, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433, USADepartment of Chemical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USALos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USALos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USAPitch-based carbon fibers are commonly used to produce polymeric carbon fiber structural composites. Several investigations have reported different methods for dispersing and subsequently aligning carbon nanotubes (CNTs) as a filler to reinforce polymer matrix. The significant difficulty in dispersing CNTs suggested the controlled-growth of CNTs on surfaces where they are needed. Here we compare between two techniques for depositing the catalyst iron used toward growing CNTs on pitch-based carbon fiber surfaces. Electrochemical deposition of iron using pulse voltametry is compared to DC magnetron iron sputtering. Carbon nanostructures growth was performed using a thermal CVD system. Characterization for comparison between both techniques was compared via SEM, TEM, and Raman spectroscopy analysis. It is shown that while both techniques were successful to grow CNTs on the carbon fiber surfaces, iron sputtering technique was capable of producing more uniform distribution of iron catalyst and thus multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) compared to MWCNTs grown using the electrochemical deposition of iron.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/860178 |
spellingShingle | M. Al-Haik C. C. Luhrs M. M. Reda Taha A. K. Roy L. Dai J. Phillips S. Doorn Hybrid Carbon Fibers/Carbon Nanotubes Structures for Next Generation Polymeric Composites Journal of Nanotechnology |
title | Hybrid Carbon Fibers/Carbon Nanotubes Structures for Next Generation Polymeric Composites |
title_full | Hybrid Carbon Fibers/Carbon Nanotubes Structures for Next Generation Polymeric Composites |
title_fullStr | Hybrid Carbon Fibers/Carbon Nanotubes Structures for Next Generation Polymeric Composites |
title_full_unstemmed | Hybrid Carbon Fibers/Carbon Nanotubes Structures for Next Generation Polymeric Composites |
title_short | Hybrid Carbon Fibers/Carbon Nanotubes Structures for Next Generation Polymeric Composites |
title_sort | hybrid carbon fibers carbon nanotubes structures for next generation polymeric composites |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/860178 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malhaik hybridcarbonfiberscarbonnanotubesstructuresfornextgenerationpolymericcomposites AT ccluhrs hybridcarbonfiberscarbonnanotubesstructuresfornextgenerationpolymericcomposites AT mmredataha hybridcarbonfiberscarbonnanotubesstructuresfornextgenerationpolymericcomposites AT akroy hybridcarbonfiberscarbonnanotubesstructuresfornextgenerationpolymericcomposites AT ldai hybridcarbonfiberscarbonnanotubesstructuresfornextgenerationpolymericcomposites AT jphillips hybridcarbonfiberscarbonnanotubesstructuresfornextgenerationpolymericcomposites AT sdoorn hybridcarbonfiberscarbonnanotubesstructuresfornextgenerationpolymericcomposites |