Armenia’s Geopolitical Double-Cross Through the Lens of the Arms Trade

The article examines the emerging cooperation in the field of armaments between the Republic of Armenia and France, focusing on the rapid development of military cooperation between the two countries and its specific dimensions. The varying political context of several deals with different types of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Teodor Detchev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UNWE Publishing Complex 2025-12-01
Series:Bulgarian Journal of International Economics and Politics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bjiep.unwe.bg/en/journalissues/article/62416
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849422816305217536
author Teodor Detchev
author_facet Teodor Detchev
author_sort Teodor Detchev
collection DOAJ
description The article examines the emerging cooperation in the field of armaments between the Republic of Armenia and France, focusing on the rapid development of military cooperation between the two countries and its specific dimensions. The varying political context of several deals with different types of arms are analysed. It is shown that in some transactions Armenia wins the favour of France, while in other cases there can be reasonable doubts that Armenia fulfils the orders of its ally – the Russian Federation. The analysis reveals unequivocally that Armenia’s intentions to purchase a large number of Caesar howitzers from France weakens the possibility of long-range artillery supplies to Ukraine and directly serves Russian interests in the war in Ukraine. The role of the Armenian state and private arms dealers in favour of Russia in the race with Ukraine to search for old Soviet and Russian weapons in 23 countries around the world is examined and analysed. These circumstances are analysed in the context of the fact that Armenia continues to be a military ally of Russia, and an Armenian military contingent is fighting on the Russian side at the front in Ukraine. It has been shown that the trend of limiting Armenia’s activity in the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) does not reduce the country’s closeness with Russia in the military field. The main lesson for the entire European Union from Armenia’s policy in the last two years should be the clear assumption that Armenia is playing a double game in which it has not at all abandoned its strategic ally – Russia.
format Article
id doaj-art-1ab2c03e93b044ee9ea5d79e2dbd095e
institution Kabale University
issn 2815-2751
2815-2875
language English
publishDate 2025-12-01
publisher UNWE Publishing Complex
record_format Article
series Bulgarian Journal of International Economics and Politics
spelling doaj-art-1ab2c03e93b044ee9ea5d79e2dbd095e2025-08-20T03:30:55ZengUNWE Publishing ComplexBulgarian Journal of International Economics and Politics2815-27512815-28752025-12-01424054https://doi.org/10.37075/BJIEP.2024.2.03Armenia’s Geopolitical Double-Cross Through the Lens of the Arms TradeTeodor Detchev0The Higher School of Security and Economics (HSSE) – Plovdiv, Bulgaria The article examines the emerging cooperation in the field of armaments between the Republic of Armenia and France, focusing on the rapid development of military cooperation between the two countries and its specific dimensions. The varying political context of several deals with different types of arms are analysed. It is shown that in some transactions Armenia wins the favour of France, while in other cases there can be reasonable doubts that Armenia fulfils the orders of its ally – the Russian Federation. The analysis reveals unequivocally that Armenia’s intentions to purchase a large number of Caesar howitzers from France weakens the possibility of long-range artillery supplies to Ukraine and directly serves Russian interests in the war in Ukraine. The role of the Armenian state and private arms dealers in favour of Russia in the race with Ukraine to search for old Soviet and Russian weapons in 23 countries around the world is examined and analysed. These circumstances are analysed in the context of the fact that Armenia continues to be a military ally of Russia, and an Armenian military contingent is fighting on the Russian side at the front in Ukraine. It has been shown that the trend of limiting Armenia’s activity in the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) does not reduce the country’s closeness with Russia in the military field. The main lesson for the entire European Union from Armenia’s policy in the last two years should be the clear assumption that Armenia is playing a double game in which it has not at all abandoned its strategic ally – Russia.https://bjiep.unwe.bg/en/journalissues/article/62416armeniafrancecaesar howitzerwar in ukrainerussian federation“bastion” apcs
spellingShingle Teodor Detchev
Armenia’s Geopolitical Double-Cross Through the Lens of the Arms Trade
Bulgarian Journal of International Economics and Politics
armenia
france
caesar howitzer
war in ukraine
russian federation
“bastion” apcs
title Armenia’s Geopolitical Double-Cross Through the Lens of the Arms Trade
title_full Armenia’s Geopolitical Double-Cross Through the Lens of the Arms Trade
title_fullStr Armenia’s Geopolitical Double-Cross Through the Lens of the Arms Trade
title_full_unstemmed Armenia’s Geopolitical Double-Cross Through the Lens of the Arms Trade
title_short Armenia’s Geopolitical Double-Cross Through the Lens of the Arms Trade
title_sort armenia s geopolitical double cross through the lens of the arms trade
topic armenia
france
caesar howitzer
war in ukraine
russian federation
“bastion” apcs
url https://bjiep.unwe.bg/en/journalissues/article/62416
work_keys_str_mv AT teodordetchev armeniasgeopoliticaldoublecrossthroughthelensofthearmstrade