Comparison of Risks Factors for Unplanned ICU Transfer after ED Admission in Patients with Infections and Those without Infections

Background. The objectives of this study were to compare the risk factors for unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) transfer after emergency department (ED) admission in patients with infections and those without infections and to explore the feasibility of using risk stratification tools for sepsis t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeffrey Che-Hung Tsai, Ching-Wan Cheng, Shao-Jen Weng, Chin-Yin Huang, David Hung-Tsang Yen, Hsiu-Ling Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/102929
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832552688834838528
author Jeffrey Che-Hung Tsai
Ching-Wan Cheng
Shao-Jen Weng
Chin-Yin Huang
David Hung-Tsang Yen
Hsiu-Ling Chen
author_facet Jeffrey Che-Hung Tsai
Ching-Wan Cheng
Shao-Jen Weng
Chin-Yin Huang
David Hung-Tsang Yen
Hsiu-Ling Chen
author_sort Jeffrey Che-Hung Tsai
collection DOAJ
description Background. The objectives of this study were to compare the risk factors for unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) transfer after emergency department (ED) admission in patients with infections and those without infections and to explore the feasibility of using risk stratification tools for sepsis to derive a prediction system for such unplanned transfer. Methods. The ICU transfer group included 313 patients, while the control group included 736 patients randomly selected from those who were not transferred to the ICU. Candidate variables were analyzed for association with unplanned ICU transfer in the 1049 study patients. Results. Twenty-four variables were associated with unplanned ICU transfer. Sixteen (66.7%) of these variables displayed association in patients with infections and those without infections. These common risk factors included specific comorbidities, physiological responses, organ dysfunctions, and other serious symptoms and signs. Several common risk factors were statistically independent. Conclusions. The risk factors for unplanned ICU transfer in patients with infections were comparable to those in patients without infections. The risk factors for unplanned ICU transfer included variables from multiple dimensions that could be organized according to the PIRO (predisposition, insult/infection, physiological response, and organ dysfunction) model, providing the basis for the development of a predictive system.
format Article
id doaj-art-1a43f420a3e446f7a6c94de3656e99aa
institution Kabale University
issn 2356-6140
1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-1a43f420a3e446f7a6c94de3656e99aa2025-02-03T05:58:02ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal2356-61401537-744X2014-01-01201410.1155/2014/102929102929Comparison of Risks Factors for Unplanned ICU Transfer after ED Admission in Patients with Infections and Those without InfectionsJeffrey Che-Hung Tsai0Ching-Wan Cheng1Shao-Jen Weng2Chin-Yin Huang3David Hung-Tsang Yen4Hsiu-Ling Chen5Department of Emergency Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2 Yude Road, North District, Taichung City 404, TaiwanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Cheng-Ching General Hospital, Taichung 407, TaiwanDepartment of Industrial Engineering & Enterprise Information, Tunghai University, Taichung 407, TaiwanProgram for Health Administration, Tunghai University, Taichung 407, TaiwanInstitute of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, TaiwanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2 Yude Road, North District, Taichung City 404, TaiwanBackground. The objectives of this study were to compare the risk factors for unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) transfer after emergency department (ED) admission in patients with infections and those without infections and to explore the feasibility of using risk stratification tools for sepsis to derive a prediction system for such unplanned transfer. Methods. The ICU transfer group included 313 patients, while the control group included 736 patients randomly selected from those who were not transferred to the ICU. Candidate variables were analyzed for association with unplanned ICU transfer in the 1049 study patients. Results. Twenty-four variables were associated with unplanned ICU transfer. Sixteen (66.7%) of these variables displayed association in patients with infections and those without infections. These common risk factors included specific comorbidities, physiological responses, organ dysfunctions, and other serious symptoms and signs. Several common risk factors were statistically independent. Conclusions. The risk factors for unplanned ICU transfer in patients with infections were comparable to those in patients without infections. The risk factors for unplanned ICU transfer included variables from multiple dimensions that could be organized according to the PIRO (predisposition, insult/infection, physiological response, and organ dysfunction) model, providing the basis for the development of a predictive system.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/102929
spellingShingle Jeffrey Che-Hung Tsai
Ching-Wan Cheng
Shao-Jen Weng
Chin-Yin Huang
David Hung-Tsang Yen
Hsiu-Ling Chen
Comparison of Risks Factors for Unplanned ICU Transfer after ED Admission in Patients with Infections and Those without Infections
The Scientific World Journal
title Comparison of Risks Factors for Unplanned ICU Transfer after ED Admission in Patients with Infections and Those without Infections
title_full Comparison of Risks Factors for Unplanned ICU Transfer after ED Admission in Patients with Infections and Those without Infections
title_fullStr Comparison of Risks Factors for Unplanned ICU Transfer after ED Admission in Patients with Infections and Those without Infections
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Risks Factors for Unplanned ICU Transfer after ED Admission in Patients with Infections and Those without Infections
title_short Comparison of Risks Factors for Unplanned ICU Transfer after ED Admission in Patients with Infections and Those without Infections
title_sort comparison of risks factors for unplanned icu transfer after ed admission in patients with infections and those without infections
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/102929
work_keys_str_mv AT jeffreychehungtsai comparisonofrisksfactorsforunplannedicutransferafteredadmissioninpatientswithinfectionsandthosewithoutinfections
AT chingwancheng comparisonofrisksfactorsforunplannedicutransferafteredadmissioninpatientswithinfectionsandthosewithoutinfections
AT shaojenweng comparisonofrisksfactorsforunplannedicutransferafteredadmissioninpatientswithinfectionsandthosewithoutinfections
AT chinyinhuang comparisonofrisksfactorsforunplannedicutransferafteredadmissioninpatientswithinfectionsandthosewithoutinfections
AT davidhungtsangyen comparisonofrisksfactorsforunplannedicutransferafteredadmissioninpatientswithinfectionsandthosewithoutinfections
AT hsiulingchen comparisonofrisksfactorsforunplannedicutransferafteredadmissioninpatientswithinfectionsandthosewithoutinfections