Comparison of Temperature Changes Between Holmium-YAG Laser and Thulium Fiber Laser in an In Vitro Setting

Objective: We aimed to evaluate and compare the rise in the temperature for the safety of the ureter and kidney parenchyma when firing the holmium laser and the thulium fiber laser (TFL). Methods: We performed a laboratory experiment to measure the rise in temperature upon firing holmium laser an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vaibhavkumar Patel, Kshitij Raghuvanshi, Krushnadevsinh Jadeja, Rajeev Chaudhari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AVES 2024-07-01
Series:Urology Research and Practice
Online Access:https://urologyresearchandpractice.org/en/comparison-of-temperature-changes-between-holmium-yag-laser-and-thulium-fiber-laser-in-an-in-vitro-setting-133957
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832576035352215552
author Vaibhavkumar Patel
Kshitij Raghuvanshi
Krushnadevsinh Jadeja
Rajeev Chaudhari
author_facet Vaibhavkumar Patel
Kshitij Raghuvanshi
Krushnadevsinh Jadeja
Rajeev Chaudhari
author_sort Vaibhavkumar Patel
collection DOAJ
description Objective: We aimed to evaluate and compare the rise in the temperature for the safety of the ureter and kidney parenchyma when firing the holmium laser and the thulium fiber laser (TFL). Methods: We performed a laboratory experiment to measure the rise in temperature upon firing holmium laser and a TFL in a 10 cm3 transparent test tube in an outdoor environment and then in a container with normal saline. Results: In a 10 cc test tube with static water at 25°C, the rise in temperature with holmium and TFL depends on the firing time, keeping power constant. On continuous firing for 10, 20, and 30 seconds, the temperature rose to 35.1, 42.7, and 53.2°C with holmium. The temperature went up to 38.3, 46.8, and 55.4°C when TFL was used. The power was kept at 10 W for both types of lasers. The temperature rise was relatively low when the test tube was immersed in a water container. It was even lower with irrigation. Conclusion: The rise in the temperature reaches to hazardous level in static water with a firing time of 30 seconds, which is almost equivalent to holmium and TFL. Thus, while using lasers in RIRS and ureteroscopy, the firing time should not exceed 20 seconds and adequate irrigation is required to prevent damage to the tissues. Also, the rise in temperature was almost equivalent to holmium and TFL; hence, TFL can be safely used in laser lithotripsy in any part of the genitourinary (GU) system.
format Article
id doaj-art-1a0a12bd1ddc4200ac724c669ef8a882
institution Kabale University
issn 2980-1478
language English
publishDate 2024-07-01
publisher AVES
record_format Article
series Urology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-1a0a12bd1ddc4200ac724c669ef8a8822025-01-31T12:33:55ZengAVESUrology Research and Practice2980-14782024-07-0150421922410.5152/tud.2025.24100Comparison of Temperature Changes Between Holmium-YAG Laser and Thulium Fiber Laser in an In Vitro SettingVaibhavkumar Patel0https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4095-2505Kshitij Raghuvanshi1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7778-4200Krushnadevsinh Jadeja2https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2450-2413Rajeev Chaudhari3https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2450-2413Department of Urology, Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, IndiaDepartment of Urology, Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, IndiaDepartment of Urology, Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, IndiaDepartment of Urology, Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, IndiaObjective: We aimed to evaluate and compare the rise in the temperature for the safety of the ureter and kidney parenchyma when firing the holmium laser and the thulium fiber laser (TFL). Methods: We performed a laboratory experiment to measure the rise in temperature upon firing holmium laser and a TFL in a 10 cm3 transparent test tube in an outdoor environment and then in a container with normal saline. Results: In a 10 cc test tube with static water at 25°C, the rise in temperature with holmium and TFL depends on the firing time, keeping power constant. On continuous firing for 10, 20, and 30 seconds, the temperature rose to 35.1, 42.7, and 53.2°C with holmium. The temperature went up to 38.3, 46.8, and 55.4°C when TFL was used. The power was kept at 10 W for both types of lasers. The temperature rise was relatively low when the test tube was immersed in a water container. It was even lower with irrigation. Conclusion: The rise in the temperature reaches to hazardous level in static water with a firing time of 30 seconds, which is almost equivalent to holmium and TFL. Thus, while using lasers in RIRS and ureteroscopy, the firing time should not exceed 20 seconds and adequate irrigation is required to prevent damage to the tissues. Also, the rise in temperature was almost equivalent to holmium and TFL; hence, TFL can be safely used in laser lithotripsy in any part of the genitourinary (GU) system.https://urologyresearchandpractice.org/en/comparison-of-temperature-changes-between-holmium-yag-laser-and-thulium-fiber-laser-in-an-in-vitro-setting-133957
spellingShingle Vaibhavkumar Patel
Kshitij Raghuvanshi
Krushnadevsinh Jadeja
Rajeev Chaudhari
Comparison of Temperature Changes Between Holmium-YAG Laser and Thulium Fiber Laser in an In Vitro Setting
Urology Research and Practice
title Comparison of Temperature Changes Between Holmium-YAG Laser and Thulium Fiber Laser in an In Vitro Setting
title_full Comparison of Temperature Changes Between Holmium-YAG Laser and Thulium Fiber Laser in an In Vitro Setting
title_fullStr Comparison of Temperature Changes Between Holmium-YAG Laser and Thulium Fiber Laser in an In Vitro Setting
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Temperature Changes Between Holmium-YAG Laser and Thulium Fiber Laser in an In Vitro Setting
title_short Comparison of Temperature Changes Between Holmium-YAG Laser and Thulium Fiber Laser in an In Vitro Setting
title_sort comparison of temperature changes between holmium yag laser and thulium fiber laser in an in vitro setting
url https://urologyresearchandpractice.org/en/comparison-of-temperature-changes-between-holmium-yag-laser-and-thulium-fiber-laser-in-an-in-vitro-setting-133957
work_keys_str_mv AT vaibhavkumarpatel comparisonoftemperaturechangesbetweenholmiumyaglaserandthuliumfiberlaserinaninvitrosetting
AT kshitijraghuvanshi comparisonoftemperaturechangesbetweenholmiumyaglaserandthuliumfiberlaserinaninvitrosetting
AT krushnadevsinhjadeja comparisonoftemperaturechangesbetweenholmiumyaglaserandthuliumfiberlaserinaninvitrosetting
AT rajeevchaudhari comparisonoftemperaturechangesbetweenholmiumyaglaserandthuliumfiberlaserinaninvitrosetting