The anti-politics of food in South Africa: Transformation, accountability and the nutrition policy subsystem

Abstract Objective: To examine power and governance arrangements in food and nutrition policy formulation and agenda-setting in South Africa Design: Analysis of the policy implementation environment and in-depth interviews were conducted focussing on: existing policy content and priorities acros...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Busiso Helard Moyo, Anne Marie Thow, Florian Kroll, Scott Drimie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press
Series:Public Health Nutrition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1368980025000163/type/journal_article
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832542943133564928
author Busiso Helard Moyo
Anne Marie Thow
Florian Kroll
Scott Drimie
author_facet Busiso Helard Moyo
Anne Marie Thow
Florian Kroll
Scott Drimie
author_sort Busiso Helard Moyo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective: To examine power and governance arrangements in food and nutrition policy formulation and agenda-setting in South Africa Design: Analysis of the policy implementation environment and in-depth interviews were conducted focussing on: existing policy content and priorities across food system sectors; institutional structures for cross-sectoral and external stakeholder engagement; exercise of power in relation to food system policies; and opportunities to strengthen action on nutrition. Setting: South Africa Participants: Interviews were conducted with 48 key stakeholders involved in the food and nutrition policy sphere: government sectors relevant to food systems (n=21), the private sector (n=4), academia (n=10), NGOs (n=11) and farmers (n=2). Results: This study found that there are power dynamics involved in shaping the planning agenda that is inadvertently generating a food system that undermines the right to food. The concept of nutrition governance remains poorly defined and applied in different ways and usually based on a relatively narrow interpretation – therefore limiting policy coherence and coordination. South Africa has strong legal institutions and practices, and social policies that support public provisioning of food, but a non-interventionist approach to the food system. Conclusions: The right to food and nutrition, as outlined in the South African Constitution, has not yet been effectively utilized to establish a robust normative and legal basis for tackling the dual challenges of food insecurity and malnutrition. Currently, the governance of the food system is grappling with substantial obstacles, balancing the influence of powerful stakeholders who uphold the status quo against its responsibilities for food justice.
format Article
id doaj-art-19f36090838a400cabb93bcc28309ba4
institution Kabale University
issn 1368-9800
1475-2727
language English
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Public Health Nutrition
spelling doaj-art-19f36090838a400cabb93bcc28309ba42025-02-03T12:01:32ZengCambridge University PressPublic Health Nutrition1368-98001475-272713210.1017/S1368980025000163The anti-politics of food in South Africa: Transformation, accountability and the nutrition policy subsystemBusiso Helard Moyo0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4956-3851Anne Marie Thow1Florian Kroll2Scott Drimie3Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, School of Public Health & DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Food Security (CoE-FS), University of the Western Cape, Robert Sobukwe Rd, Bellville, Cape Town, South Africa, 7535. E-mail –School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown NSW 2006, Australia. E-mail –Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS), University of the Western Cape Private Bag X17, Bellville, 7535.Department of Global Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine Sciences, University of Stellenbosch Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602 South Africa. . Abstract Objective: To examine power and governance arrangements in food and nutrition policy formulation and agenda-setting in South Africa Design: Analysis of the policy implementation environment and in-depth interviews were conducted focussing on: existing policy content and priorities across food system sectors; institutional structures for cross-sectoral and external stakeholder engagement; exercise of power in relation to food system policies; and opportunities to strengthen action on nutrition. Setting: South Africa Participants: Interviews were conducted with 48 key stakeholders involved in the food and nutrition policy sphere: government sectors relevant to food systems (n=21), the private sector (n=4), academia (n=10), NGOs (n=11) and farmers (n=2). Results: This study found that there are power dynamics involved in shaping the planning agenda that is inadvertently generating a food system that undermines the right to food. The concept of nutrition governance remains poorly defined and applied in different ways and usually based on a relatively narrow interpretation – therefore limiting policy coherence and coordination. South Africa has strong legal institutions and practices, and social policies that support public provisioning of food, but a non-interventionist approach to the food system. Conclusions: The right to food and nutrition, as outlined in the South African Constitution, has not yet been effectively utilized to establish a robust normative and legal basis for tackling the dual challenges of food insecurity and malnutrition. Currently, the governance of the food system is grappling with substantial obstacles, balancing the influence of powerful stakeholders who uphold the status quo against its responsibilities for food justice. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1368980025000163/type/journal_articleRight to foodnutritionSouth AfricaMalnutritionDouble burdenPolicySustainable Development GoalsFood sovereignty
spellingShingle Busiso Helard Moyo
Anne Marie Thow
Florian Kroll
Scott Drimie
The anti-politics of food in South Africa: Transformation, accountability and the nutrition policy subsystem
Public Health Nutrition
Right to food
nutrition
South Africa
Malnutrition
Double burden
Policy
Sustainable Development Goals
Food sovereignty
title The anti-politics of food in South Africa: Transformation, accountability and the nutrition policy subsystem
title_full The anti-politics of food in South Africa: Transformation, accountability and the nutrition policy subsystem
title_fullStr The anti-politics of food in South Africa: Transformation, accountability and the nutrition policy subsystem
title_full_unstemmed The anti-politics of food in South Africa: Transformation, accountability and the nutrition policy subsystem
title_short The anti-politics of food in South Africa: Transformation, accountability and the nutrition policy subsystem
title_sort anti politics of food in south africa transformation accountability and the nutrition policy subsystem
topic Right to food
nutrition
South Africa
Malnutrition
Double burden
Policy
Sustainable Development Goals
Food sovereignty
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1368980025000163/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT busisohelardmoyo theantipoliticsoffoodinsouthafricatransformationaccountabilityandthenutritionpolicysubsystem
AT annemariethow theantipoliticsoffoodinsouthafricatransformationaccountabilityandthenutritionpolicysubsystem
AT floriankroll theantipoliticsoffoodinsouthafricatransformationaccountabilityandthenutritionpolicysubsystem
AT scottdrimie theantipoliticsoffoodinsouthafricatransformationaccountabilityandthenutritionpolicysubsystem
AT busisohelardmoyo antipoliticsoffoodinsouthafricatransformationaccountabilityandthenutritionpolicysubsystem
AT annemariethow antipoliticsoffoodinsouthafricatransformationaccountabilityandthenutritionpolicysubsystem
AT floriankroll antipoliticsoffoodinsouthafricatransformationaccountabilityandthenutritionpolicysubsystem
AT scottdrimie antipoliticsoffoodinsouthafricatransformationaccountabilityandthenutritionpolicysubsystem