Charlson comorbidity index and all-cause mortality in patients with delayed hemodialysis initiation: a prospective cohort study

Abstract Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has recently been recognized as a public health issue. Prognosis and risk stratification are fundamental for decision-making to implement patient-centered strategies in clinical practice. Different prognosis scales have been evaluated, such as the Cha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Allina P. Flores-Mendoza, Mariano García-Campa, Concepción Sánchez-Martínez, Elisa Guerrero-González, Lilia M. Rizo-Topete, Mara C. Olivo-Gutiérrez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-07-01
Series:BMC Nephrology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-025-04197-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has recently been recognized as a public health issue. Prognosis and risk stratification are fundamental for decision-making to implement patient-centered strategies in clinical practice. Different prognosis scales have been evaluated, such as the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), surprise questions, functional and biochemical parameters, to stratify patients with CKD initiating dialysis. The aim of this study was to determine prognostic factors for mortality in patients with CKD and delayed initiation of hemodialysis (HD). Methods We performed a prospective cohort study based on data from a reference dialysis center in the northeastern region of Mexico. Individuals with CKD and delayed initiation of hemodialysis were stratified according to the CCI at admission. Additionally, sociodemographic, functional, and biochemical parameters were compared to assess all-cause mortality. Results A total of 218 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 45.5 weeks. An important proportion of all-cause mortality was associated with infections among all groups. At the end of follow-up, overall all-cause mortality was 40%. Patients stratified with a low CCI had a survival rate of 79.2%, whereas those with moderate, high and very high CCIs had survival rates of 66.7%, 56.6%, and 41%, respectively. After adjusting for clinical and biochemical characteristics, patients who answered that they would not be surprised if they died in the following 6 months had an increased risk of all-cause mortality regardless of the CCI category. Patients with a high CCI (HR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.22–5.18) and very high CCI (HR: 3.73; 95% CI: 1.89–7.36) clearly had increased risk for all-cause mortality. Conclusion Individualized patient-centered care should be the goal of standard care. By integrating the CCI and the surprise question (would you be surprised if the patient died in the following 6 months), it is possible to guide decisions further therapeutic strategies in patients in resource-limited settings.
ISSN:1471-2369