Improving influenza vaccine uptake in clinical risk groups: patient, provider and commissioner perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of expanding delivery pathways in England
Background People under the age of 65 in clinical risk groups are at increased risk of severe complications and death from influenza. In England, influenza vaccine coverage rates in this cohort remain profoundly low. This qualitative study aimed to explore (1) the reasons that underly suboptimal inf...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2024-05-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Public Health |
| Online Access: | https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000929.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832583349352267776 |
|---|---|
| author | Sandra Mounier-Jack Rajeka Lazarus Ben Kasstan Ifra Ali |
| author_facet | Sandra Mounier-Jack Rajeka Lazarus Ben Kasstan Ifra Ali |
| author_sort | Sandra Mounier-Jack |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background People under the age of 65 in clinical risk groups are at increased risk of severe complications and death from influenza. In England, influenza vaccine coverage rates in this cohort remain profoundly low. This qualitative study aimed to explore (1) the reasons that underly suboptimal influenza vaccine uptake among different clinical risk groups in England and (2) how healthcare providers and commissioners perceive the feasibility and acceptability of integrating the influenza vaccine programme in non-primary care settings.Methods The study consisted of two phases. Phase I involved 32 semi-structured interviews conducted with individuals from three clinical risk groups: diabetes, chronic liver disease or chronic respiratory disease (or comorbidities). Phase II consisted of semi-structured interviews with 50 healthcare providers based in National Health Service primary and secondary care settings, and influenza vaccine commissioners and programme managers. Data were analysed thematically.Results Access was not the primary issue underlying suboptimal vaccine uptake among participants in clinical risk groups, who instead cited low-risk perceptions of influenza infection and deficits of information about the relevance of vaccination for their condition management. Healthcare providers in non-primary care settings rarely discussed or recommended influenza vaccination across patient pathways, despite being able to address the concerns raised by participants in clinical risk groups. Healthcare providers were positive about the potential to offer vaccine recommendations and delivery, but questions remain around feasibility.Conclusion Patient pathways are punctuated with varying opportunities to discuss or deliver influenza vaccines during the winter season, though the commissioning and organisation of chronic disease management shapes how clinical risk groups interface with primary/secondary tiers of healthcare services. Embedding vaccine delivery in non-primary care settings may help to reduce inequalities and offer patients at risk the information and consent pathways they desire but is not a cost-neutral innovation and requires resource allocation. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-1962258a004f46258414103cf137c55e |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2753-4294 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-05-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Public Health |
| spelling | doaj-art-1962258a004f46258414103cf137c55e2025-01-28T16:30:14ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Public Health2753-42942024-05-012110.1136/bmjph-2024-000929Improving influenza vaccine uptake in clinical risk groups: patient, provider and commissioner perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of expanding delivery pathways in EnglandSandra Mounier-Jack0Rajeka Lazarus1Ben Kasstan2Ifra Ali3National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Vaccinations and Immunisation, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UKUniversity Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UKDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UKDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UKBackground People under the age of 65 in clinical risk groups are at increased risk of severe complications and death from influenza. In England, influenza vaccine coverage rates in this cohort remain profoundly low. This qualitative study aimed to explore (1) the reasons that underly suboptimal influenza vaccine uptake among different clinical risk groups in England and (2) how healthcare providers and commissioners perceive the feasibility and acceptability of integrating the influenza vaccine programme in non-primary care settings.Methods The study consisted of two phases. Phase I involved 32 semi-structured interviews conducted with individuals from three clinical risk groups: diabetes, chronic liver disease or chronic respiratory disease (or comorbidities). Phase II consisted of semi-structured interviews with 50 healthcare providers based in National Health Service primary and secondary care settings, and influenza vaccine commissioners and programme managers. Data were analysed thematically.Results Access was not the primary issue underlying suboptimal vaccine uptake among participants in clinical risk groups, who instead cited low-risk perceptions of influenza infection and deficits of information about the relevance of vaccination for their condition management. Healthcare providers in non-primary care settings rarely discussed or recommended influenza vaccination across patient pathways, despite being able to address the concerns raised by participants in clinical risk groups. Healthcare providers were positive about the potential to offer vaccine recommendations and delivery, but questions remain around feasibility.Conclusion Patient pathways are punctuated with varying opportunities to discuss or deliver influenza vaccines during the winter season, though the commissioning and organisation of chronic disease management shapes how clinical risk groups interface with primary/secondary tiers of healthcare services. Embedding vaccine delivery in non-primary care settings may help to reduce inequalities and offer patients at risk the information and consent pathways they desire but is not a cost-neutral innovation and requires resource allocation.https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000929.full |
| spellingShingle | Sandra Mounier-Jack Rajeka Lazarus Ben Kasstan Ifra Ali Improving influenza vaccine uptake in clinical risk groups: patient, provider and commissioner perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of expanding delivery pathways in England BMJ Public Health |
| title | Improving influenza vaccine uptake in clinical risk groups: patient, provider and commissioner perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of expanding delivery pathways in England |
| title_full | Improving influenza vaccine uptake in clinical risk groups: patient, provider and commissioner perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of expanding delivery pathways in England |
| title_fullStr | Improving influenza vaccine uptake in clinical risk groups: patient, provider and commissioner perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of expanding delivery pathways in England |
| title_full_unstemmed | Improving influenza vaccine uptake in clinical risk groups: patient, provider and commissioner perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of expanding delivery pathways in England |
| title_short | Improving influenza vaccine uptake in clinical risk groups: patient, provider and commissioner perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of expanding delivery pathways in England |
| title_sort | improving influenza vaccine uptake in clinical risk groups patient provider and commissioner perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of expanding delivery pathways in england |
| url | https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000929.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sandramounierjack improvinginfluenzavaccineuptakeinclinicalriskgroupspatientproviderandcommissionerperspectivesontheacceptabilityandfeasibilityofexpandingdeliverypathwaysinengland AT rajekalazarus improvinginfluenzavaccineuptakeinclinicalriskgroupspatientproviderandcommissionerperspectivesontheacceptabilityandfeasibilityofexpandingdeliverypathwaysinengland AT benkasstan improvinginfluenzavaccineuptakeinclinicalriskgroupspatientproviderandcommissionerperspectivesontheacceptabilityandfeasibilityofexpandingdeliverypathwaysinengland AT ifraali improvinginfluenzavaccineuptakeinclinicalriskgroupspatientproviderandcommissionerperspectivesontheacceptabilityandfeasibilityofexpandingdeliverypathwaysinengland |