Analyzing listening and comprehension strategies among engineering students: A cross-sectional study

Effective listening strategies are crucial for academic success in engineering education, particularly where English serves as the medium of instruction. This cross-sectional study examined the relationship between demographic factors and listening strategy utilization among 234 engineering students...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bhuvaneshwari Palanisamy, V. Rajasekaran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-06-01
Series:MethodsX
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016125002183
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849419554280701952
author Bhuvaneshwari Palanisamy
V. Rajasekaran
author_facet Bhuvaneshwari Palanisamy
V. Rajasekaran
author_sort Bhuvaneshwari Palanisamy
collection DOAJ
description Effective listening strategies are crucial for academic success in engineering education, particularly where English serves as the medium of instruction. This cross-sectional study examined the relationship between demographic factors and listening strategy utilization among 234 engineering students (126 males, 108 females) at Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai. Data was collected using a 40-item Listening Strategies Analysis Questionnaire measuring seven dimensions: note-taking, active learning, comprehension, predictive organization, critical thinking, resource-based learning and self-management. Statistical analysis revealed significant gender differences in note-taking behavior (t(232) = -3.037, p = .003), with female students demonstrating higher scores than males. Critical thinking showed the highest adoption among all strategies. While age showed no significant effect on note-taking, notable differences were found in predictive organization and critical thinking across age groups. • Female students showed significantly higher note-taking scores (M = 3.58, SD = 0.56) compared to males (M = 3.37, SD = 0.49). • Critical thinking was the most adopted strategy (M = 3.64, SD = 0.57). • Age significantly influenced predictive organization (p = .024) and critical thinking abilities (p = .011).These insights can inform targeted interventions to enhance listening comprehension skills in engineering education.
format Article
id doaj-art-188edc5464c544bdaeb9a7e94de58cc6
institution Kabale University
issn 2215-0161
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series MethodsX
spelling doaj-art-188edc5464c544bdaeb9a7e94de58cc62025-08-20T03:32:03ZengElsevierMethodsX2215-01612025-06-011410337210.1016/j.mex.2025.103372Analyzing listening and comprehension strategies among engineering students: A cross-sectional studyBhuvaneshwari Palanisamy0V. Rajasekaran1School of Social Sciences and Languages (SSL), Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, IndiaCorresponding author.; School of Social Sciences and Languages (SSL), Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, IndiaEffective listening strategies are crucial for academic success in engineering education, particularly where English serves as the medium of instruction. This cross-sectional study examined the relationship between demographic factors and listening strategy utilization among 234 engineering students (126 males, 108 females) at Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai. Data was collected using a 40-item Listening Strategies Analysis Questionnaire measuring seven dimensions: note-taking, active learning, comprehension, predictive organization, critical thinking, resource-based learning and self-management. Statistical analysis revealed significant gender differences in note-taking behavior (t(232) = -3.037, p = .003), with female students demonstrating higher scores than males. Critical thinking showed the highest adoption among all strategies. While age showed no significant effect on note-taking, notable differences were found in predictive organization and critical thinking across age groups. • Female students showed significantly higher note-taking scores (M = 3.58, SD = 0.56) compared to males (M = 3.37, SD = 0.49). • Critical thinking was the most adopted strategy (M = 3.64, SD = 0.57). • Age significantly influenced predictive organization (p = .024) and critical thinking abilities (p = .011).These insights can inform targeted interventions to enhance listening comprehension skills in engineering education.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016125002183Listening Strategies Analysis in Engineering Education (LSAEE)
spellingShingle Bhuvaneshwari Palanisamy
V. Rajasekaran
Analyzing listening and comprehension strategies among engineering students: A cross-sectional study
MethodsX
Listening Strategies Analysis in Engineering Education (LSAEE)
title Analyzing listening and comprehension strategies among engineering students: A cross-sectional study
title_full Analyzing listening and comprehension strategies among engineering students: A cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Analyzing listening and comprehension strategies among engineering students: A cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing listening and comprehension strategies among engineering students: A cross-sectional study
title_short Analyzing listening and comprehension strategies among engineering students: A cross-sectional study
title_sort analyzing listening and comprehension strategies among engineering students a cross sectional study
topic Listening Strategies Analysis in Engineering Education (LSAEE)
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016125002183
work_keys_str_mv AT bhuvaneshwaripalanisamy analyzinglisteningandcomprehensionstrategiesamongengineeringstudentsacrosssectionalstudy
AT vrajasekaran analyzinglisteningandcomprehensionstrategiesamongengineeringstudentsacrosssectionalstudy