Short-Term Response of Instream Habitats and Brown Trout (<i>Salmo trutta</i>) Populations to Habitat Rehabilitation in Two Trout Streams, Minnesota, USA

Efforts to rehabilitate habitats in trout streams are common, but the pre-and post-project monitoring of impacts has produced conflicting results. Consequently, long-term monitoring plans were established for the reaches of two streams in southeastern Minnesota, USA, that were planned for rehabilita...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Neal D. Mundahl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-12-01
Series:Fishes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/10/1/14
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832588464539828224
author Neal D. Mundahl
author_facet Neal D. Mundahl
author_sort Neal D. Mundahl
collection DOAJ
description Efforts to rehabilitate habitats in trout streams are common, but the pre-and post-project monitoring of impacts has produced conflicting results. Consequently, long-term monitoring plans were established for the reaches of two streams in southeastern Minnesota, USA, that were planned for rehabilitation. Instream habitats and brown trout abundances in randomly selected sections of each rehabilitation reach were assessed for one or more years pre-project followed by multiple reoccurring surveys in the years post-rehabilitation. Significant increases in certain types of fish cover (overhanging banks, mid-channel boulders, and deep water) were observed immediately after rehabilitation in one or both streams, whereas improved channel dimensions (narrower and deeper) and hydrologic variables (higher current velocities) were less likely to be realized in the short term (1 to 4 years). Trout abundances and catch rates displayed significant year-to-year variability, but regional trout population cycles masked any true post-project increases in trout within the rehabilitated reaches. Overall, future monitoring is expected to highlight additional changes (i.e., improvements) in instream habitats as rehabilitated reaches heal and stabilize, with brown trout numbers expected to increase to higher average levels after several generations have adapted to the rehabilitated habitats.
format Article
id doaj-art-16da54e91d4342f78e702dae5d0ddc22
institution Kabale University
issn 2410-3888
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Fishes
spelling doaj-art-16da54e91d4342f78e702dae5d0ddc222025-01-24T13:32:26ZengMDPI AGFishes2410-38882024-12-011011410.3390/fishes10010014Short-Term Response of Instream Habitats and Brown Trout (<i>Salmo trutta</i>) Populations to Habitat Rehabilitation in Two Trout Streams, Minnesota, USANeal D. Mundahl0Program in Ecology and Environmental Science and Large River Studies Center, Department of Biology, Winona State University, Winona, MN 55987, USAEfforts to rehabilitate habitats in trout streams are common, but the pre-and post-project monitoring of impacts has produced conflicting results. Consequently, long-term monitoring plans were established for the reaches of two streams in southeastern Minnesota, USA, that were planned for rehabilitation. Instream habitats and brown trout abundances in randomly selected sections of each rehabilitation reach were assessed for one or more years pre-project followed by multiple reoccurring surveys in the years post-rehabilitation. Significant increases in certain types of fish cover (overhanging banks, mid-channel boulders, and deep water) were observed immediately after rehabilitation in one or both streams, whereas improved channel dimensions (narrower and deeper) and hydrologic variables (higher current velocities) were less likely to be realized in the short term (1 to 4 years). Trout abundances and catch rates displayed significant year-to-year variability, but regional trout population cycles masked any true post-project increases in trout within the rehabilitated reaches. Overall, future monitoring is expected to highlight additional changes (i.e., improvements) in instream habitats as rehabilitated reaches heal and stabilize, with brown trout numbers expected to increase to higher average levels after several generations have adapted to the rehabilitated habitats.https://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/10/1/14stream restorationbrown trouthabitat rehabilitationcoldwater streams
spellingShingle Neal D. Mundahl
Short-Term Response of Instream Habitats and Brown Trout (<i>Salmo trutta</i>) Populations to Habitat Rehabilitation in Two Trout Streams, Minnesota, USA
Fishes
stream restoration
brown trout
habitat rehabilitation
coldwater streams
title Short-Term Response of Instream Habitats and Brown Trout (<i>Salmo trutta</i>) Populations to Habitat Rehabilitation in Two Trout Streams, Minnesota, USA
title_full Short-Term Response of Instream Habitats and Brown Trout (<i>Salmo trutta</i>) Populations to Habitat Rehabilitation in Two Trout Streams, Minnesota, USA
title_fullStr Short-Term Response of Instream Habitats and Brown Trout (<i>Salmo trutta</i>) Populations to Habitat Rehabilitation in Two Trout Streams, Minnesota, USA
title_full_unstemmed Short-Term Response of Instream Habitats and Brown Trout (<i>Salmo trutta</i>) Populations to Habitat Rehabilitation in Two Trout Streams, Minnesota, USA
title_short Short-Term Response of Instream Habitats and Brown Trout (<i>Salmo trutta</i>) Populations to Habitat Rehabilitation in Two Trout Streams, Minnesota, USA
title_sort short term response of instream habitats and brown trout i salmo trutta i populations to habitat rehabilitation in two trout streams minnesota usa
topic stream restoration
brown trout
habitat rehabilitation
coldwater streams
url https://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/10/1/14
work_keys_str_mv AT nealdmundahl shorttermresponseofinstreamhabitatsandbrowntroutisalmotruttaipopulationstohabitatrehabilitationintwotroutstreamsminnesotausa