The Superiority of Removable Contact Splints in the Healing of Diabetic Foot during Postoperative Care

Objective. Off-loading is one of the crucial components of diabetic foot (DF) therapy. However, there remains a paucity of studies on the most suitable off-loading for DF patients under postoperative care. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of different protective off-loading devices on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vladimíra Fejfarová, Jaroslav Pavlů, Robert Bém, Veronika Wosková, Michal Dubský, Andrea Němcová, Alexandra Jirkovská, Bedřich Sixta, Karol Sutoris, Filip Thieme, David G. Armstrong, Eliška Vrátná, Jitka Hazdrová, Věra Lánská
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Diabetes Research
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5945839
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832558706159517696
author Vladimíra Fejfarová
Jaroslav Pavlů
Robert Bém
Veronika Wosková
Michal Dubský
Andrea Němcová
Alexandra Jirkovská
Bedřich Sixta
Karol Sutoris
Filip Thieme
David G. Armstrong
Eliška Vrátná
Jitka Hazdrová
Věra Lánská
author_facet Vladimíra Fejfarová
Jaroslav Pavlů
Robert Bém
Veronika Wosková
Michal Dubský
Andrea Němcová
Alexandra Jirkovská
Bedřich Sixta
Karol Sutoris
Filip Thieme
David G. Armstrong
Eliška Vrátná
Jitka Hazdrová
Věra Lánská
author_sort Vladimíra Fejfarová
collection DOAJ
description Objective. Off-loading is one of the crucial components of diabetic foot (DF) therapy. However, there remains a paucity of studies on the most suitable off-loading for DF patients under postoperative care. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of different protective off-loading devices on healing and postoperative complications in DF patients following limb preservation surgery. Methods. This observational study comprised 127 DF patients. All enrolled patients had undergone foot surgery and were off-loaded empirically as follows: wheelchair+removable contact splint (RCS) (group R: 29.2%), wheelchair only (group W: 48%), and wheelchair+removable prefabricated device (group WP: 22.8%). We compared the primary (e.g., the number of healed patients, healing time, and duration of antibiotic (ATB) therapy) and secondary outcomes (e.g., number of reamputations and number and duration of rehospitalizations) with regard to the operation regions across all study groups. Results. The lowest number of postoperative complications (number of reamputations: p=0.028; rehospitalizations: p=0.0085; and major amputations: p=0.02) was in group R compared to groups W and WP. There was a strong trend toward a higher percentage of healed patients (78.4% vs. 55.7% and 65.5%; p=0.068) over a shorter duration (13.7 vs. 16.5 and 20.3 weeks; p=0.055) in the R group, as well. Furthermore, our subanalysis revealed better primary outcomes in patients operated in the midfoot and better secondary outcomes in patients after forefoot surgery—odds ratios favouring the R group included healing at 2.5 (95% CI, 1.04-6.15; p=0.037), reamputations at 0.32 (95% CI, 0.12-0.84; p=0.018), and rehospitalizations at 0.22 (95% CI, 0.08-0.58; p=0.0013). Conclusions. This observational study suggests that removable contact splint combined with a wheelchair is better than a wheelchair with or without removable off-loading device for accelerating wound healing after surgical procedures; it also minimises overall postoperative complications, reducing the number of reamputations by up to 77% and the number of rehospitalizations by up to 66%.
format Article
id doaj-art-16b97c60f6d5443a89eebce897936160
institution Kabale University
issn 2314-6745
2314-6753
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Diabetes Research
spelling doaj-art-16b97c60f6d5443a89eebce8979361602025-02-03T01:31:37ZengWileyJournal of Diabetes Research2314-67452314-67532019-01-01201910.1155/2019/59458395945839The Superiority of Removable Contact Splints in the Healing of Diabetic Foot during Postoperative CareVladimíra Fejfarová0Jaroslav Pavlů1Robert Bém2Veronika Wosková3Michal Dubský4Andrea Němcová5Alexandra Jirkovská6Bedřich Sixta7Karol Sutoris8Filip Thieme9David G. Armstrong10Eliška Vrátná11Jitka Hazdrová12Věra Lánská13Diabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech RepublicDiabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech RepublicDiabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech RepublicDiabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech RepublicDiabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech RepublicDiabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech RepublicDiabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of Transplant Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of Transplant Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of Transplant Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech RepublicSouthwestern Academic Limb Salvage Alliance (SALSA), University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, USADiabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech RepublicDiabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech RepublicDiabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech RepublicObjective. Off-loading is one of the crucial components of diabetic foot (DF) therapy. However, there remains a paucity of studies on the most suitable off-loading for DF patients under postoperative care. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of different protective off-loading devices on healing and postoperative complications in DF patients following limb preservation surgery. Methods. This observational study comprised 127 DF patients. All enrolled patients had undergone foot surgery and were off-loaded empirically as follows: wheelchair+removable contact splint (RCS) (group R: 29.2%), wheelchair only (group W: 48%), and wheelchair+removable prefabricated device (group WP: 22.8%). We compared the primary (e.g., the number of healed patients, healing time, and duration of antibiotic (ATB) therapy) and secondary outcomes (e.g., number of reamputations and number and duration of rehospitalizations) with regard to the operation regions across all study groups. Results. The lowest number of postoperative complications (number of reamputations: p=0.028; rehospitalizations: p=0.0085; and major amputations: p=0.02) was in group R compared to groups W and WP. There was a strong trend toward a higher percentage of healed patients (78.4% vs. 55.7% and 65.5%; p=0.068) over a shorter duration (13.7 vs. 16.5 and 20.3 weeks; p=0.055) in the R group, as well. Furthermore, our subanalysis revealed better primary outcomes in patients operated in the midfoot and better secondary outcomes in patients after forefoot surgery—odds ratios favouring the R group included healing at 2.5 (95% CI, 1.04-6.15; p=0.037), reamputations at 0.32 (95% CI, 0.12-0.84; p=0.018), and rehospitalizations at 0.22 (95% CI, 0.08-0.58; p=0.0013). Conclusions. This observational study suggests that removable contact splint combined with a wheelchair is better than a wheelchair with or without removable off-loading device for accelerating wound healing after surgical procedures; it also minimises overall postoperative complications, reducing the number of reamputations by up to 77% and the number of rehospitalizations by up to 66%.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5945839
spellingShingle Vladimíra Fejfarová
Jaroslav Pavlů
Robert Bém
Veronika Wosková
Michal Dubský
Andrea Němcová
Alexandra Jirkovská
Bedřich Sixta
Karol Sutoris
Filip Thieme
David G. Armstrong
Eliška Vrátná
Jitka Hazdrová
Věra Lánská
The Superiority of Removable Contact Splints in the Healing of Diabetic Foot during Postoperative Care
Journal of Diabetes Research
title The Superiority of Removable Contact Splints in the Healing of Diabetic Foot during Postoperative Care
title_full The Superiority of Removable Contact Splints in the Healing of Diabetic Foot during Postoperative Care
title_fullStr The Superiority of Removable Contact Splints in the Healing of Diabetic Foot during Postoperative Care
title_full_unstemmed The Superiority of Removable Contact Splints in the Healing of Diabetic Foot during Postoperative Care
title_short The Superiority of Removable Contact Splints in the Healing of Diabetic Foot during Postoperative Care
title_sort superiority of removable contact splints in the healing of diabetic foot during postoperative care
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5945839
work_keys_str_mv AT vladimirafejfarova thesuperiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT jaroslavpavlu thesuperiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT robertbem thesuperiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT veronikawoskova thesuperiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT michaldubsky thesuperiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT andreanemcova thesuperiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT alexandrajirkovska thesuperiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT bedrichsixta thesuperiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT karolsutoris thesuperiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT filipthieme thesuperiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT davidgarmstrong thesuperiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT eliskavratna thesuperiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT jitkahazdrova thesuperiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT veralanska thesuperiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT vladimirafejfarova superiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT jaroslavpavlu superiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT robertbem superiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT veronikawoskova superiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT michaldubsky superiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT andreanemcova superiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT alexandrajirkovska superiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT bedrichsixta superiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT karolsutoris superiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT filipthieme superiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT davidgarmstrong superiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT eliskavratna superiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT jitkahazdrova superiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare
AT veralanska superiorityofremovablecontactsplintsinthehealingofdiabeticfootduringpostoperativecare