No Difference between Spinal Anesthesia with Hyperbaric Ropivacaine and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Sedation with and without Intrathecal Fentanyl: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial

To enhance the duration of single-shot spinal anesthesia, intrathecal fentanyl and intravenous dexmedetomidine are widely used as adjuvants to local anesthetics. This noninferiority trial evaluated whether hyperbaric ropivacaine alone can produce a noninferior duration of sensory block in comparison...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seung Cheol Lee, Tae Hyung Kim, So Ron Choi, Sang Yoong Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Pain Research and Management
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3395783
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832566182432997376
author Seung Cheol Lee
Tae Hyung Kim
So Ron Choi
Sang Yoong Park
author_facet Seung Cheol Lee
Tae Hyung Kim
So Ron Choi
Sang Yoong Park
author_sort Seung Cheol Lee
collection DOAJ
description To enhance the duration of single-shot spinal anesthesia, intrathecal fentanyl and intravenous dexmedetomidine are widely used as adjuvants to local anesthetics. This noninferiority trial evaluated whether hyperbaric ropivacaine alone can produce a noninferior duration of sensory block in comparison to hyperbaric ropivacaine with intrathecal fentanyl in patients under dexmedetomidine sedation. Methods. Fifty patients scheduled for elective lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to receive either hyperbaric ropivacaine 15 mg (Group R) or hyperbaric ropivacaine 15 mg with intrathecal fentanyl 20 μg (Group RF). Intravenous dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg for 10 min, followed by 0.5 μg/kg/h) was administered in both groups. The primary outcome of this study was the time to two-dermatomal regression of sensory block. The noninferiority margin for the mean difference was −10 min. Characteristics of the block, intraoperative and postoperative side effects, postoperative pain score, and analgesic consumption were assessed as secondary outcomes. Results. There was no difference in the two-dermatomal regressions of sensory block between the two groups (Group R 70.4 ± 10.2 min, Group RF 71.2 ± 12.4 min, p = 0.804) with a mean difference of 0.8 min (−7.2 to 5.6, 95% confidence interval). Thus, the noninferiority of hyperbaric ropivacaine alone was established. There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes between the two groups. Conclusions. Under intravenous dexmedetomidine sedation, the duration of spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric ropivacaine alone was noninferior to that of hyperbaric ropivacaine with intrathecal fentanyl. This suggests that addition of intrathecal fentanyl to hyperbaric ropivacaine may not be necessary in patients receiving intravenous dexmedetomidine.
format Article
id doaj-art-16689752fba24817a106d470db8a9a40
institution Kabale University
issn 1918-1523
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Pain Research and Management
spelling doaj-art-16689752fba24817a106d470db8a9a402025-02-03T01:04:45ZengWileyPain Research and Management1918-15232022-01-01202210.1155/2022/3395783No Difference between Spinal Anesthesia with Hyperbaric Ropivacaine and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Sedation with and without Intrathecal Fentanyl: A Randomized Noninferiority TrialSeung Cheol Lee0Tae Hyung Kim1So Ron Choi2Sang Yoong Park3Department of Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineTo enhance the duration of single-shot spinal anesthesia, intrathecal fentanyl and intravenous dexmedetomidine are widely used as adjuvants to local anesthetics. This noninferiority trial evaluated whether hyperbaric ropivacaine alone can produce a noninferior duration of sensory block in comparison to hyperbaric ropivacaine with intrathecal fentanyl in patients under dexmedetomidine sedation. Methods. Fifty patients scheduled for elective lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to receive either hyperbaric ropivacaine 15 mg (Group R) or hyperbaric ropivacaine 15 mg with intrathecal fentanyl 20 μg (Group RF). Intravenous dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg for 10 min, followed by 0.5 μg/kg/h) was administered in both groups. The primary outcome of this study was the time to two-dermatomal regression of sensory block. The noninferiority margin for the mean difference was −10 min. Characteristics of the block, intraoperative and postoperative side effects, postoperative pain score, and analgesic consumption were assessed as secondary outcomes. Results. There was no difference in the two-dermatomal regressions of sensory block between the two groups (Group R 70.4 ± 10.2 min, Group RF 71.2 ± 12.4 min, p = 0.804) with a mean difference of 0.8 min (−7.2 to 5.6, 95% confidence interval). Thus, the noninferiority of hyperbaric ropivacaine alone was established. There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes between the two groups. Conclusions. Under intravenous dexmedetomidine sedation, the duration of spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric ropivacaine alone was noninferior to that of hyperbaric ropivacaine with intrathecal fentanyl. This suggests that addition of intrathecal fentanyl to hyperbaric ropivacaine may not be necessary in patients receiving intravenous dexmedetomidine.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3395783
spellingShingle Seung Cheol Lee
Tae Hyung Kim
So Ron Choi
Sang Yoong Park
No Difference between Spinal Anesthesia with Hyperbaric Ropivacaine and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Sedation with and without Intrathecal Fentanyl: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial
Pain Research and Management
title No Difference between Spinal Anesthesia with Hyperbaric Ropivacaine and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Sedation with and without Intrathecal Fentanyl: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial
title_full No Difference between Spinal Anesthesia with Hyperbaric Ropivacaine and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Sedation with and without Intrathecal Fentanyl: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial
title_fullStr No Difference between Spinal Anesthesia with Hyperbaric Ropivacaine and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Sedation with and without Intrathecal Fentanyl: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial
title_full_unstemmed No Difference between Spinal Anesthesia with Hyperbaric Ropivacaine and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Sedation with and without Intrathecal Fentanyl: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial
title_short No Difference between Spinal Anesthesia with Hyperbaric Ropivacaine and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Sedation with and without Intrathecal Fentanyl: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial
title_sort no difference between spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric ropivacaine and intravenous dexmedetomidine sedation with and without intrathecal fentanyl a randomized noninferiority trial
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3395783
work_keys_str_mv AT seungcheollee nodifferencebetweenspinalanesthesiawithhyperbaricropivacaineandintravenousdexmedetomidinesedationwithandwithoutintrathecalfentanylarandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT taehyungkim nodifferencebetweenspinalanesthesiawithhyperbaricropivacaineandintravenousdexmedetomidinesedationwithandwithoutintrathecalfentanylarandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT soronchoi nodifferencebetweenspinalanesthesiawithhyperbaricropivacaineandintravenousdexmedetomidinesedationwithandwithoutintrathecalfentanylarandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT sangyoongpark nodifferencebetweenspinalanesthesiawithhyperbaricropivacaineandintravenousdexmedetomidinesedationwithandwithoutintrathecalfentanylarandomizednoninferioritytrial