Accidental Explantation of a Cochlear Implant in a Child Who Developed Cholesteatoma as a Late Complication of Cochlear Implantation

Introduction. Although rare, cholesteatoma can develop as a late complication of cochlear implantation. The electrode array may then be exposed in the external auditory canal surrounded by cholesteatoma debris. Case Report. The cochlear implant of a child was inadvertently explanted by a clinician d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wong Kein Low, Wan Ni Pok, Win Nie Ng, Judy Tan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Otolaryngology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6353706
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832560227782754304
author Wong Kein Low
Wan Ni Pok
Win Nie Ng
Judy Tan
author_facet Wong Kein Low
Wan Ni Pok
Win Nie Ng
Judy Tan
author_sort Wong Kein Low
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. Although rare, cholesteatoma can develop as a late complication of cochlear implantation. The electrode array may then be exposed in the external auditory canal surrounded by cholesteatoma debris. Case Report. The cochlear implant of a child was inadvertently explanted by a clinician during a routine aural toilet procedure. The child had previously reported recurrent ear infections, pain, and unexplained implant function degradation. Reimplantation was carried out 2 days later with good postoperative hearing results. Part of the electrode array was observed to be embedded in cholesteatoma. Postreimplantation recovery was complicated by a breakdown of the blind-sac. Discussion. Clinical indicators that could alert the clinician to the possibility of this late complication include recurrent infections, presence of keratotic debris in the external auditory canal, unexplained implant function degradation, and nonauditory stimulation. Although this patient managed to achieve excellent postreimplantation hearing outcomes, a delay in reimplantation surgery following explantation could possibly compromise successful reinsertion of the electrode array. External ear canal overclosure without mastoid cavity obliteration has merit in facilitating CT scan surveillance, but it may increase the risk of the blind-sac breaking down. This case also illustrated how the electrode array could have facilitated propagation of the cholesteatoma from the middle ear to the mastoid. Conclusion. If aural toilet is required in the implanted ear of a cochlear implant recipient, any complaint of hearing change, pain, or discharge should alert the clinician of the possibility of cholesteatoma developing. It warrants prompt evaluation by an experienced otologist in order to prevent accidental explantation. Keywords. Cochlear implant, cochlear implant complications, chronic suppurative otitis media, cholesteatoma, reimplantation, blind-sac, external auditory canal overclosure, mastoid cavity obliteration.
format Article
id doaj-art-164c071996e24bbf9a053e5b203a5f1d
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-6765
2090-6773
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Case Reports in Otolaryngology
spelling doaj-art-164c071996e24bbf9a053e5b203a5f1d2025-02-03T01:28:09ZengWileyCase Reports in Otolaryngology2090-67652090-67732020-01-01202010.1155/2020/63537066353706Accidental Explantation of a Cochlear Implant in a Child Who Developed Cholesteatoma as a Late Complication of Cochlear ImplantationWong Kein Low0Wan Ni Pok1Win Nie Ng2Judy Tan3Novena ENT Head and Neck Surgery Specialist Centre, SingaporeNovena ENT Head and Neck Surgery Specialist Centre, SingaporeNovena ENT Head and Neck Surgery Specialist Centre, SingaporeDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Mount Elizabeth Novena Hospital, SingaporeIntroduction. Although rare, cholesteatoma can develop as a late complication of cochlear implantation. The electrode array may then be exposed in the external auditory canal surrounded by cholesteatoma debris. Case Report. The cochlear implant of a child was inadvertently explanted by a clinician during a routine aural toilet procedure. The child had previously reported recurrent ear infections, pain, and unexplained implant function degradation. Reimplantation was carried out 2 days later with good postoperative hearing results. Part of the electrode array was observed to be embedded in cholesteatoma. Postreimplantation recovery was complicated by a breakdown of the blind-sac. Discussion. Clinical indicators that could alert the clinician to the possibility of this late complication include recurrent infections, presence of keratotic debris in the external auditory canal, unexplained implant function degradation, and nonauditory stimulation. Although this patient managed to achieve excellent postreimplantation hearing outcomes, a delay in reimplantation surgery following explantation could possibly compromise successful reinsertion of the electrode array. External ear canal overclosure without mastoid cavity obliteration has merit in facilitating CT scan surveillance, but it may increase the risk of the blind-sac breaking down. This case also illustrated how the electrode array could have facilitated propagation of the cholesteatoma from the middle ear to the mastoid. Conclusion. If aural toilet is required in the implanted ear of a cochlear implant recipient, any complaint of hearing change, pain, or discharge should alert the clinician of the possibility of cholesteatoma developing. It warrants prompt evaluation by an experienced otologist in order to prevent accidental explantation. Keywords. Cochlear implant, cochlear implant complications, chronic suppurative otitis media, cholesteatoma, reimplantation, blind-sac, external auditory canal overclosure, mastoid cavity obliteration.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6353706
spellingShingle Wong Kein Low
Wan Ni Pok
Win Nie Ng
Judy Tan
Accidental Explantation of a Cochlear Implant in a Child Who Developed Cholesteatoma as a Late Complication of Cochlear Implantation
Case Reports in Otolaryngology
title Accidental Explantation of a Cochlear Implant in a Child Who Developed Cholesteatoma as a Late Complication of Cochlear Implantation
title_full Accidental Explantation of a Cochlear Implant in a Child Who Developed Cholesteatoma as a Late Complication of Cochlear Implantation
title_fullStr Accidental Explantation of a Cochlear Implant in a Child Who Developed Cholesteatoma as a Late Complication of Cochlear Implantation
title_full_unstemmed Accidental Explantation of a Cochlear Implant in a Child Who Developed Cholesteatoma as a Late Complication of Cochlear Implantation
title_short Accidental Explantation of a Cochlear Implant in a Child Who Developed Cholesteatoma as a Late Complication of Cochlear Implantation
title_sort accidental explantation of a cochlear implant in a child who developed cholesteatoma as a late complication of cochlear implantation
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6353706
work_keys_str_mv AT wongkeinlow accidentalexplantationofacochlearimplantinachildwhodevelopedcholesteatomaasalatecomplicationofcochlearimplantation
AT wannipok accidentalexplantationofacochlearimplantinachildwhodevelopedcholesteatomaasalatecomplicationofcochlearimplantation
AT winnieng accidentalexplantationofacochlearimplantinachildwhodevelopedcholesteatomaasalatecomplicationofcochlearimplantation
AT judytan accidentalexplantationofacochlearimplantinachildwhodevelopedcholesteatomaasalatecomplicationofcochlearimplantation