Diagnostic Agreement between Prehospital Emergency and In-Hospital Physicians

Background. The aim of the study was to determine the diagnostic agreement between the discharge diagnosis and the suspected diagnosis by the prehospital emergency physician and to run a sensitivity analysis of the most common diagnoses by the prehospital emergency physician. Methods. The diagnostic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nikolai Ramadanov, Roman Klein, Fabian Laue, Wilhelm Behringer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Emergency Medicine International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3769826
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832556171947409408
author Nikolai Ramadanov
Roman Klein
Fabian Laue
Wilhelm Behringer
author_facet Nikolai Ramadanov
Roman Klein
Fabian Laue
Wilhelm Behringer
author_sort Nikolai Ramadanov
collection DOAJ
description Background. The aim of the study was to determine the diagnostic agreement between the discharge diagnosis and the suspected diagnosis by the prehospital emergency physician and to run a sensitivity analysis of the most common diagnoses by the prehospital emergency physician. Methods. The diagnostic agreement was determined by a systematic comparison of the discharge diagnosis with suspected diagnosis by the prehospital emergency physician in a period of 24 months at the emergency medical services in Bad Belzig. The diagnostic agreement of the 13 most common discharge diagnoses was compared to the remaining diagnostic agreement. The results were tested for statistical significance using the chi-squared test. Results. In 64.1% of cases included, a diagnostic agreement occurred. There was a high proportion of diagnostic agreement for hypoglycemia (97%), atrial fibrillation (87%), cramping seizure (86%), hypertensive crisis (85.5%), and syncope (81%). There was a low proportion of diagnostic agreement for chest wall pain (27%), pneumonia (32%), and cardiac decompensation (53%). Conclusions. Our attention in practice and emergency medical courses should be directed to chest pain patients and the main symptom of dyspnea, because of the high proportion of incorrect diagnoses by the prehospital emergency physician. It should be noted that 92% of incorrectly diagnosed chest wall pain cases were overestimated with an acute coronary syndrome.
format Article
id doaj-art-15f26d4040914447868705bb1436937d
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-2840
2090-2859
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Emergency Medicine International
spelling doaj-art-15f26d4040914447868705bb1436937d2025-02-03T05:46:02ZengWileyEmergency Medicine International2090-28402090-28592019-01-01201910.1155/2019/37698263769826Diagnostic Agreement between Prehospital Emergency and In-Hospital PhysiciansNikolai Ramadanov0Roman Klein1Fabian Laue2Wilhelm Behringer3Center for Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, GermanyOrthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Sports Traumatology, Marienhausklinikum Hetzelstift, Stiftstr. 10, 67434 Neustadt, GermanyClinic for Reconstruction and Trauma Surgery, Ernst von Bergmann Hospital Charlottenstr. 72, 14467 Potsdam, GermanyCenter for Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, GermanyBackground. The aim of the study was to determine the diagnostic agreement between the discharge diagnosis and the suspected diagnosis by the prehospital emergency physician and to run a sensitivity analysis of the most common diagnoses by the prehospital emergency physician. Methods. The diagnostic agreement was determined by a systematic comparison of the discharge diagnosis with suspected diagnosis by the prehospital emergency physician in a period of 24 months at the emergency medical services in Bad Belzig. The diagnostic agreement of the 13 most common discharge diagnoses was compared to the remaining diagnostic agreement. The results were tested for statistical significance using the chi-squared test. Results. In 64.1% of cases included, a diagnostic agreement occurred. There was a high proportion of diagnostic agreement for hypoglycemia (97%), atrial fibrillation (87%), cramping seizure (86%), hypertensive crisis (85.5%), and syncope (81%). There was a low proportion of diagnostic agreement for chest wall pain (27%), pneumonia (32%), and cardiac decompensation (53%). Conclusions. Our attention in practice and emergency medical courses should be directed to chest pain patients and the main symptom of dyspnea, because of the high proportion of incorrect diagnoses by the prehospital emergency physician. It should be noted that 92% of incorrectly diagnosed chest wall pain cases were overestimated with an acute coronary syndrome.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3769826
spellingShingle Nikolai Ramadanov
Roman Klein
Fabian Laue
Wilhelm Behringer
Diagnostic Agreement between Prehospital Emergency and In-Hospital Physicians
Emergency Medicine International
title Diagnostic Agreement between Prehospital Emergency and In-Hospital Physicians
title_full Diagnostic Agreement between Prehospital Emergency and In-Hospital Physicians
title_fullStr Diagnostic Agreement between Prehospital Emergency and In-Hospital Physicians
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Agreement between Prehospital Emergency and In-Hospital Physicians
title_short Diagnostic Agreement between Prehospital Emergency and In-Hospital Physicians
title_sort diagnostic agreement between prehospital emergency and in hospital physicians
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3769826
work_keys_str_mv AT nikolairamadanov diagnosticagreementbetweenprehospitalemergencyandinhospitalphysicians
AT romanklein diagnosticagreementbetweenprehospitalemergencyandinhospitalphysicians
AT fabianlaue diagnosticagreementbetweenprehospitalemergencyandinhospitalphysicians
AT wilhelmbehringer diagnosticagreementbetweenprehospitalemergencyandinhospitalphysicians