Post-Spring Frost Canopy Recovery, Vine Balance, and Fruit Composition in cv. Barbera Grapevines

Background and Aims. In viticulture, one of the effects of warming trends is the advance of budburst date and the consequent increased risk of spring frost-related damage. In 2021, severe frost events affected a large fraction of European viticulture. In a cv. Barbera vineyard, located in NW Italy,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Filippo Del Zozzo, Ginevra Canavera, Silvia Pagani, Matteo Gatti, Stefano Poni, Tommaso Frioni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6596021
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832547270084526080
author Filippo Del Zozzo
Ginevra Canavera
Silvia Pagani
Matteo Gatti
Stefano Poni
Tommaso Frioni
author_facet Filippo Del Zozzo
Ginevra Canavera
Silvia Pagani
Matteo Gatti
Stefano Poni
Tommaso Frioni
author_sort Filippo Del Zozzo
collection DOAJ
description Background and Aims. In viticulture, one of the effects of warming trends is the advance of budburst date and the consequent increased risk of spring frost-related damage. In 2021, severe frost events affected a large fraction of European viticulture. In a cv. Barbera vineyard, located in NW Italy, primary bud shoots (PBS), secondary bud shoots (SBS), and suckers (SK) were tagged after the occurrence of freezing temperatures in spring. The goal of the study was to clarify if SBS could partially restore yield loss and analyze their contribution to fruit composition. Methods and Results. The number of developing SBS and SK correlated with the number of killed PBS. While PBS bore 1.44 inflorescences per shoot, SBS had much lower fertility (0.4), with SK at intermediate levels (0.85). The vine yield was 40% of the previous season, with SBS bunches contributing just 17% of the total. SBS produced smaller and looser bunches, as compared with PBS (−28% mass and −27% compactness). At harvest, no difference was found in grape total soluble solids (TSS) among different shoot types. However, the TSS average was notably higher than that observed in the previous season (27.8°Brix vs. 23.3°Brix in 2020). Interestingly, while in PBS and SK, a direct correlation (linear and quadratic, respectively) existed between the leaf area to yield ratio (LA/Y) and grape TSS or total anthocyanins, this did not occur for SBS. Conclusions. In the case of spring frost damage, the number of PBS avoiding fatal injuries will drive agronomic results at harvest since SBS contribution to total yield is modest due to low shoot fruitfulness. The frost-induced increase in vine LA/Y leads to a dramatic rise in grape TSS and phenolics. Significance of the Study. When spring frosts kill a significant number of primary shoots, an altered grape composition at harvest should be expected due to changes in vine balance. Therefore, the vineyard management should be adjusted accordingly early in the season. Further studies are needed to test specific post-frost canopy management strategies ensuring yield, optimal fruit composition, and cane renewal.
format Article
id doaj-art-155dfd398d8e463b9857e1f95b01b7e8
institution Kabale University
issn 1755-0238
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research
spelling doaj-art-155dfd398d8e463b9857e1f95b01b7e82025-02-03T06:45:22ZengWileyAustralian Journal of Grape and Wine Research1755-02382022-01-01202210.1155/2022/6596021Post-Spring Frost Canopy Recovery, Vine Balance, and Fruit Composition in cv. Barbera GrapevinesFilippo Del Zozzo0Ginevra Canavera1Silvia Pagani2Matteo Gatti3Stefano Poni4Tommaso Frioni5Department of Sustainable Crop ProductionDepartment of Sustainable Crop ProductionDepartment of Sustainable Crop ProductionDepartment of Sustainable Crop ProductionDepartment of Sustainable Crop ProductionDepartment of Sustainable Crop ProductionBackground and Aims. In viticulture, one of the effects of warming trends is the advance of budburst date and the consequent increased risk of spring frost-related damage. In 2021, severe frost events affected a large fraction of European viticulture. In a cv. Barbera vineyard, located in NW Italy, primary bud shoots (PBS), secondary bud shoots (SBS), and suckers (SK) were tagged after the occurrence of freezing temperatures in spring. The goal of the study was to clarify if SBS could partially restore yield loss and analyze their contribution to fruit composition. Methods and Results. The number of developing SBS and SK correlated with the number of killed PBS. While PBS bore 1.44 inflorescences per shoot, SBS had much lower fertility (0.4), with SK at intermediate levels (0.85). The vine yield was 40% of the previous season, with SBS bunches contributing just 17% of the total. SBS produced smaller and looser bunches, as compared with PBS (−28% mass and −27% compactness). At harvest, no difference was found in grape total soluble solids (TSS) among different shoot types. However, the TSS average was notably higher than that observed in the previous season (27.8°Brix vs. 23.3°Brix in 2020). Interestingly, while in PBS and SK, a direct correlation (linear and quadratic, respectively) existed between the leaf area to yield ratio (LA/Y) and grape TSS or total anthocyanins, this did not occur for SBS. Conclusions. In the case of spring frost damage, the number of PBS avoiding fatal injuries will drive agronomic results at harvest since SBS contribution to total yield is modest due to low shoot fruitfulness. The frost-induced increase in vine LA/Y leads to a dramatic rise in grape TSS and phenolics. Significance of the Study. When spring frosts kill a significant number of primary shoots, an altered grape composition at harvest should be expected due to changes in vine balance. Therefore, the vineyard management should be adjusted accordingly early in the season. Further studies are needed to test specific post-frost canopy management strategies ensuring yield, optimal fruit composition, and cane renewal.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6596021
spellingShingle Filippo Del Zozzo
Ginevra Canavera
Silvia Pagani
Matteo Gatti
Stefano Poni
Tommaso Frioni
Post-Spring Frost Canopy Recovery, Vine Balance, and Fruit Composition in cv. Barbera Grapevines
Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research
title Post-Spring Frost Canopy Recovery, Vine Balance, and Fruit Composition in cv. Barbera Grapevines
title_full Post-Spring Frost Canopy Recovery, Vine Balance, and Fruit Composition in cv. Barbera Grapevines
title_fullStr Post-Spring Frost Canopy Recovery, Vine Balance, and Fruit Composition in cv. Barbera Grapevines
title_full_unstemmed Post-Spring Frost Canopy Recovery, Vine Balance, and Fruit Composition in cv. Barbera Grapevines
title_short Post-Spring Frost Canopy Recovery, Vine Balance, and Fruit Composition in cv. Barbera Grapevines
title_sort post spring frost canopy recovery vine balance and fruit composition in cv barbera grapevines
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6596021
work_keys_str_mv AT filippodelzozzo postspringfrostcanopyrecoveryvinebalanceandfruitcompositionincvbarberagrapevines
AT ginevracanavera postspringfrostcanopyrecoveryvinebalanceandfruitcompositionincvbarberagrapevines
AT silviapagani postspringfrostcanopyrecoveryvinebalanceandfruitcompositionincvbarberagrapevines
AT matteogatti postspringfrostcanopyrecoveryvinebalanceandfruitcompositionincvbarberagrapevines
AT stefanoponi postspringfrostcanopyrecoveryvinebalanceandfruitcompositionincvbarberagrapevines
AT tommasofrioni postspringfrostcanopyrecoveryvinebalanceandfruitcompositionincvbarberagrapevines