Early mobilization post-myocardial infarction: A scoping review.

Bedrest and immobilization following a myocardial infarction (MI) can lead to functional impairment that can persist following hospitalization. Early mobilization (EM) is associated with good functional and clinical outcomes in critical care, medical and surgical settings. However, the impact and cu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haroon Munir, Jake Fromowitz, Michael Goldfarb
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0237866&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832540021871083520
author Haroon Munir
Jake Fromowitz
Michael Goldfarb
author_facet Haroon Munir
Jake Fromowitz
Michael Goldfarb
author_sort Haroon Munir
collection DOAJ
description Bedrest and immobilization following a myocardial infarction (MI) can lead to functional impairment that can persist following hospitalization. Early mobilization (EM) is associated with good functional and clinical outcomes in critical care, medical and surgical settings. However, the impact and current role of EM in post-MI care has not been well-defined. Our objective was to assess the evidence for post-MI mobilization, define current post-MI mobilization practice, and understand perspectives of cardiovascular professionals toward mobilization. A scoping review related to "early mobilization" and "myocardial infarction" was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Methodology. Pubmed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library and CINAHL databases were included. Results were categorized into six topic areas. There were 59 references included in the analysis. There was evidence for the effectiveness and safety of earlier mobilization in experimental studies of the pre-revascularization era, but there was a lack of strong evidence for EM in contemporary post-MI care. Mobilization appears to be safe following arterial catheterization and is associated with minimal hemodynamic and respiratory compromise. Most people are delayed in mobilizing post-MI and spend the majority of the initial hospitalization period lying in bed. Only 1 of 7 current major cardiovascular professional societies guidelines recommend EM post-MI. There were no studies exploring the perspectives of cardiovascular professionals toward mobilization. EM may be beneficial in the post-MI care. However, there is an evidence gap for the impact of EM post-MI in the contemporary literature. More robust evidence from randomized clinical trials is required to inform clinicians and influence practice.
format Article
id doaj-art-14b4a05d7b40493bba372c91b1d6189d
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-14b4a05d7b40493bba372c91b1d6189d2025-02-05T05:33:01ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01158e023786610.1371/journal.pone.0237866Early mobilization post-myocardial infarction: A scoping review.Haroon MunirJake FromowitzMichael GoldfarbBedrest and immobilization following a myocardial infarction (MI) can lead to functional impairment that can persist following hospitalization. Early mobilization (EM) is associated with good functional and clinical outcomes in critical care, medical and surgical settings. However, the impact and current role of EM in post-MI care has not been well-defined. Our objective was to assess the evidence for post-MI mobilization, define current post-MI mobilization practice, and understand perspectives of cardiovascular professionals toward mobilization. A scoping review related to "early mobilization" and "myocardial infarction" was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Methodology. Pubmed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library and CINAHL databases were included. Results were categorized into six topic areas. There were 59 references included in the analysis. There was evidence for the effectiveness and safety of earlier mobilization in experimental studies of the pre-revascularization era, but there was a lack of strong evidence for EM in contemporary post-MI care. Mobilization appears to be safe following arterial catheterization and is associated with minimal hemodynamic and respiratory compromise. Most people are delayed in mobilizing post-MI and spend the majority of the initial hospitalization period lying in bed. Only 1 of 7 current major cardiovascular professional societies guidelines recommend EM post-MI. There were no studies exploring the perspectives of cardiovascular professionals toward mobilization. EM may be beneficial in the post-MI care. However, there is an evidence gap for the impact of EM post-MI in the contemporary literature. More robust evidence from randomized clinical trials is required to inform clinicians and influence practice.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0237866&type=printable
spellingShingle Haroon Munir
Jake Fromowitz
Michael Goldfarb
Early mobilization post-myocardial infarction: A scoping review.
PLoS ONE
title Early mobilization post-myocardial infarction: A scoping review.
title_full Early mobilization post-myocardial infarction: A scoping review.
title_fullStr Early mobilization post-myocardial infarction: A scoping review.
title_full_unstemmed Early mobilization post-myocardial infarction: A scoping review.
title_short Early mobilization post-myocardial infarction: A scoping review.
title_sort early mobilization post myocardial infarction a scoping review
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0237866&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT haroonmunir earlymobilizationpostmyocardialinfarctionascopingreview
AT jakefromowitz earlymobilizationpostmyocardialinfarctionascopingreview
AT michaelgoldfarb earlymobilizationpostmyocardialinfarctionascopingreview