The Soviet city and the ‘other cultural’ heritage

Little is known about the relationship between ‘ours’ and the ‘other’ in Soviet architecture. Attitudes to heritage in the Kaliningrad region and in the former Central Asian republics, despite their dissimilarity, have much in common. The architectural and town-planning heritage, which had been dev...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Юлия Косенкова
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences 2024-12-01
Series:Проект Байкал
Subjects:
Online Access:https://projectbaikal.com/index.php/pb/article/view/2429
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832595592102019072
author Юлия Косенкова
author_facet Юлия Косенкова
author_sort Юлия Косенкова
collection DOAJ
description Little is known about the relationship between ‘ours’ and the ‘other’ in Soviet architecture. Attitudes to heritage in the Kaliningrad region and in the former Central Asian republics, despite their dissimilarity, have much in common. The architectural and town-planning heritage, which had been developed in these regions for centuries and reflected the peculiarities of local culture, was perceived as ‘other cultural’, oppositional to the Soviet regime. The article considers the attitude to the ‘other cultural’ heritage in the formation of architectural and spatial environment of Soviet cities.
format Article
id doaj-art-14691c28123749c88777ecf0d4dac58c
institution Kabale University
issn 2307-4485
2309-3072
language Russian
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences
record_format Article
series Проект Байкал
spelling doaj-art-14691c28123749c88777ecf0d4dac58c2025-01-18T10:00:47ZrusRussian Academy of Architecture and Construction SciencesПроект Байкал2307-44852309-30722024-12-01218210.51461/issn.2309-3072/82.2429The Soviet city and the ‘other cultural’ heritageЮлия Косенкова0National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering Little is known about the relationship between ‘ours’ and the ‘other’ in Soviet architecture. Attitudes to heritage in the Kaliningrad region and in the former Central Asian republics, despite their dissimilarity, have much in common. The architectural and town-planning heritage, which had been developed in these regions for centuries and reflected the peculiarities of local culture, was perceived as ‘other cultural’, oppositional to the Soviet regime. The article considers the attitude to the ‘other cultural’ heritage in the formation of architectural and spatial environment of Soviet cities. https://projectbaikal.com/index.php/pb/article/view/2429architectural and town-planning heritageKaliningrad regionCentral Asian regionarchitecture and town-planning of the Soviet period
spellingShingle Юлия Косенкова
The Soviet city and the ‘other cultural’ heritage
Проект Байкал
architectural and town-planning heritage
Kaliningrad region
Central Asian region
architecture and town-planning of the Soviet period
title The Soviet city and the ‘other cultural’ heritage
title_full The Soviet city and the ‘other cultural’ heritage
title_fullStr The Soviet city and the ‘other cultural’ heritage
title_full_unstemmed The Soviet city and the ‘other cultural’ heritage
title_short The Soviet city and the ‘other cultural’ heritage
title_sort soviet city and the other cultural heritage
topic architectural and town-planning heritage
Kaliningrad region
Central Asian region
architecture and town-planning of the Soviet period
url https://projectbaikal.com/index.php/pb/article/view/2429
work_keys_str_mv AT ûliâkosenkova thesovietcityandtheotherculturalheritage
AT ûliâkosenkova sovietcityandtheotherculturalheritage