Slavery and Kant’s Doctrine of Right

In the 1780s through the end of 1790s, Kant made various references to slavery (in its different forms) and the transatlantic slave trade in the context of his political philosophy or philosophy of right. He thereby had opportunities at least to articulate a normative critique of the race-based chat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Huaping Lu-Adler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Aperio 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Modern Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jmphil.org/article/id/2554/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832575951428386816
author Huaping Lu-Adler
author_facet Huaping Lu-Adler
author_sort Huaping Lu-Adler
collection DOAJ
description In the 1780s through the end of 1790s, Kant made various references to slavery (in its different forms) and the transatlantic slave trade in the context of his political philosophy or philosophy of right. He thereby had opportunities at least to articulate a normative critique of the race-based chattel slavery or Atlantic slavery and the associated slave trade qua (legalized) institutions. But he did neither. This normative silence about the institutions of Atlantic slavery and the slave trade points to certain limitations of Kant's political philosophy, limitations that might have made it theoretically difficult for him to figure out exactly what to do about those institutions as entrenched political realities. 
format Article
id doaj-art-1396d40900ee41309dc3188dfb79673c
institution Kabale University
issn 2644-0652
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Aperio
record_format Article
series Journal of Modern Philosophy
spelling doaj-art-1396d40900ee41309dc3188dfb79673c2025-01-31T16:08:55ZengAperioJournal of Modern Philosophy2644-06522025-01-016210.25894/jmp.2554Slavery and Kant’s Doctrine of RightHuaping Lu-AdlerIn the 1780s through the end of 1790s, Kant made various references to slavery (in its different forms) and the transatlantic slave trade in the context of his political philosophy or philosophy of right. He thereby had opportunities at least to articulate a normative critique of the race-based chattel slavery or Atlantic slavery and the associated slave trade qua (legalized) institutions. But he did neither. This normative silence about the institutions of Atlantic slavery and the slave trade points to certain limitations of Kant's political philosophy, limitations that might have made it theoretically difficult for him to figure out exactly what to do about those institutions as entrenched political realities. https://jmphil.org/article/id/2554/rightcivil stateinnate rightslaverycivil personalitycitizen
spellingShingle Huaping Lu-Adler
Slavery and Kant’s Doctrine of Right
Journal of Modern Philosophy
right
civil state
innate right
slavery
civil personality
citizen
title Slavery and Kant’s Doctrine of Right
title_full Slavery and Kant’s Doctrine of Right
title_fullStr Slavery and Kant’s Doctrine of Right
title_full_unstemmed Slavery and Kant’s Doctrine of Right
title_short Slavery and Kant’s Doctrine of Right
title_sort slavery and kant s doctrine of right
topic right
civil state
innate right
slavery
civil personality
citizen
url https://jmphil.org/article/id/2554/
work_keys_str_mv AT huapingluadler slaveryandkantsdoctrineofright