Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review.
<h4>Introduction</h4>Selective reporting bias occurs when chance or selective outcome reporting rather than the intervention contributes to group differences. The prevailing concern about selective reporting bias is the possibility of results being modified towards specific conclusions....
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Cole Wayant, Caleb Scheckel, Chandler Hicks, Timothy Nissen, Linda Leduc, Mousumi Som, Matt Vassar |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178379 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Systematic review: Outcome reporting bias is a problem in high impact factor neurology journals.
by: Benjamin Howard, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Using the CONSORT statement to evaluate the completeness of reporting of addiction randomised trials: a cross-sectional review
by: Michael Bibens, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01) -
Endorsement of reporting guidelines and clinical trial registration across urological medical journals: a cross-sectional study
by: Alex Hagood, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Family medicine journals’ endorsement of reporting guidelines and clinical trial registration: a cross-sectional analysis
by: Wyatt Compton, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Bias of selection on human copy-number variants.
by: Duc-Quang Nguyen, et al.
Published: (2006-02-01)