Continuous Exercise but Not High Intensity Interval Training Improves Fat Distribution in Overweight Adults

Objective. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of high intensity interval training (HIIT) versus continuous aerobic exercise training (CONT) or placebo (PLA) on body composition by randomized controlled design. Methods. Work capacity and body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiome...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shelley E. Keating, Elizabeth A. Machan, Helen T. O'Connor, James A. Gerofi, Amanda Sainsbury, Ian D. Caterson, Nathan A. Johnson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:Journal of Obesity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/834865
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832559951206154240
author Shelley E. Keating
Elizabeth A. Machan
Helen T. O'Connor
James A. Gerofi
Amanda Sainsbury
Ian D. Caterson
Nathan A. Johnson
author_facet Shelley E. Keating
Elizabeth A. Machan
Helen T. O'Connor
James A. Gerofi
Amanda Sainsbury
Ian D. Caterson
Nathan A. Johnson
author_sort Shelley E. Keating
collection DOAJ
description Objective. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of high intensity interval training (HIIT) versus continuous aerobic exercise training (CONT) or placebo (PLA) on body composition by randomized controlled design. Methods. Work capacity and body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) were measured before and after 12 weeks of intervention in 38 previously inactive overweight adults. Results. There was a significant group × time interaction for change in work capacity (P<0.001), which increased significantly in CONT (23.8±3.0%) and HIIT (22.3±3.5%) but not PLA (3.1±5.0%). There was a near-significant main effect for percentage trunk fat, with trunk fat reducing in CONT by 3.1±1.6% and in PLA by 1.1±0.4%, but not in HIIT (increase of 0.7±1.0%) (P=0.07). There was a significant reduction in android fat percentage in CONT (2.7±1.3%) and PLA (1.4±0.8%) but not HIIT (increase of 0.8±0.7%) (P=0.04). Conclusion. These data suggest that HIIT may be advocated as a time-efficient strategy for eliciting comparable fitness benefits to traditional continuous exercise in inactive, overweight adults. However, in this population HIIT does not confer the same benefit to body fat levels as continuous exercise training.
format Article
id doaj-art-1193466a9db9434a9ee15b4b8545b145
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-0708
2090-0716
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Obesity
spelling doaj-art-1193466a9db9434a9ee15b4b8545b1452025-02-03T01:28:49ZengWileyJournal of Obesity2090-07082090-07162014-01-01201410.1155/2014/834865834865Continuous Exercise but Not High Intensity Interval Training Improves Fat Distribution in Overweight AdultsShelley E. Keating0Elizabeth A. Machan1Helen T. O'Connor2James A. Gerofi3Amanda Sainsbury4Ian D. Caterson5Nathan A. Johnson6Discipline of Exercise and Sports Science, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, AustraliaDiscipline of Exercise and Sports Science, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, AustraliaDiscipline of Exercise and Sports Science, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, AustraliaBoden Institute of Obesity, Nutrition, Exercise and Eating Disorders, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, AustraliaBoden Institute of Obesity, Nutrition, Exercise and Eating Disorders, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, AustraliaBoden Institute of Obesity, Nutrition, Exercise and Eating Disorders, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, AustraliaDiscipline of Exercise and Sports Science, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, AustraliaObjective. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of high intensity interval training (HIIT) versus continuous aerobic exercise training (CONT) or placebo (PLA) on body composition by randomized controlled design. Methods. Work capacity and body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) were measured before and after 12 weeks of intervention in 38 previously inactive overweight adults. Results. There was a significant group × time interaction for change in work capacity (P<0.001), which increased significantly in CONT (23.8±3.0%) and HIIT (22.3±3.5%) but not PLA (3.1±5.0%). There was a near-significant main effect for percentage trunk fat, with trunk fat reducing in CONT by 3.1±1.6% and in PLA by 1.1±0.4%, but not in HIIT (increase of 0.7±1.0%) (P=0.07). There was a significant reduction in android fat percentage in CONT (2.7±1.3%) and PLA (1.4±0.8%) but not HIIT (increase of 0.8±0.7%) (P=0.04). Conclusion. These data suggest that HIIT may be advocated as a time-efficient strategy for eliciting comparable fitness benefits to traditional continuous exercise in inactive, overweight adults. However, in this population HIIT does not confer the same benefit to body fat levels as continuous exercise training.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/834865
spellingShingle Shelley E. Keating
Elizabeth A. Machan
Helen T. O'Connor
James A. Gerofi
Amanda Sainsbury
Ian D. Caterson
Nathan A. Johnson
Continuous Exercise but Not High Intensity Interval Training Improves Fat Distribution in Overweight Adults
Journal of Obesity
title Continuous Exercise but Not High Intensity Interval Training Improves Fat Distribution in Overweight Adults
title_full Continuous Exercise but Not High Intensity Interval Training Improves Fat Distribution in Overweight Adults
title_fullStr Continuous Exercise but Not High Intensity Interval Training Improves Fat Distribution in Overweight Adults
title_full_unstemmed Continuous Exercise but Not High Intensity Interval Training Improves Fat Distribution in Overweight Adults
title_short Continuous Exercise but Not High Intensity Interval Training Improves Fat Distribution in Overweight Adults
title_sort continuous exercise but not high intensity interval training improves fat distribution in overweight adults
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/834865
work_keys_str_mv AT shelleyekeating continuousexercisebutnothighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesfatdistributioninoverweightadults
AT elizabethamachan continuousexercisebutnothighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesfatdistributioninoverweightadults
AT helentoconnor continuousexercisebutnothighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesfatdistributioninoverweightadults
AT jamesagerofi continuousexercisebutnothighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesfatdistributioninoverweightadults
AT amandasainsbury continuousexercisebutnothighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesfatdistributioninoverweightadults
AT iandcaterson continuousexercisebutnothighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesfatdistributioninoverweightadults
AT nathanajohnson continuousexercisebutnothighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesfatdistributioninoverweightadults