Calculated plasma volume status in hemodialysis patients

Background Plasma volume (PV) calculated from hematocrit and body weight has applications in cardiovascular disease. The current study investigated the validity of the calculated PV for predicting volume overload and its prognostic utility in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD).Patients and method...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qiankun Zhang, Hang Fang, Lie Jin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2024-12-01
Series:Renal Failure
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/0886022X.2024.2322685
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832591078031622144
author Qiankun Zhang
Hang Fang
Lie Jin
author_facet Qiankun Zhang
Hang Fang
Lie Jin
author_sort Qiankun Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Background Plasma volume (PV) calculated from hematocrit and body weight has applications in cardiovascular disease. The current study investigated the validity of the calculated PV for predicting volume overload and its prognostic utility in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD).Patients and methods Fifty-four HD patients were prospectively enrolled, and their actual PV (aPV) and relative PV status (PVS) were calculated. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) with assessment of and total body water (TBW), intracellular water (ICW), extracellular water (ECW), and overhydration (OH) and routine blood examinations were performed before dialysis. A second cohort of 164 HD patients was retrospectively enrolled to evaluate the relationship between the calculated PVS and the outcome, with an endpoint of all-cause mortality.Results aPV was significantly associated with TBW, ICW, ECW, OH, and ECW/TBW (all p < 0.001), and most strongly with ECW (r = 0.83). aPV predicted the extent of volume overload with an AUC of 0.770 (p < 0.001), but PVS did not (AUC = 0.617, p = 0.091). Median follow-up time was 53 months, during the course of which 60 (36.58%) patients died. Values for PVS (12.94 ± 10.87% vs. 7.45 ± 5.90%, p = 0.024) and time-averaged PVS (12.83 ± 11.20 vs. 6.78 ± 6.22%, p < 0.001) were significantly increased in patients who died relative to those who survived. A value of time-averaged PVS >8.72% was significantly associated with an increased incidence of all-cause mortality (HR = 2.48, p = 0.0023).Conclusions aPV was most strongly associated with ECW measured using BIA. HD patients with higher time-averaged PVS had a higher rate of all-cause mortality.
format Article
id doaj-art-115776901b1b45e59d0cccae8d615329
institution Kabale University
issn 0886-022X
1525-6049
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Renal Failure
spelling doaj-art-115776901b1b45e59d0cccae8d6153292025-01-23T04:17:48ZengTaylor & Francis GroupRenal Failure0886-022X1525-60492024-12-0146110.1080/0886022X.2024.2322685Calculated plasma volume status in hemodialysis patientsQiankun Zhang0Hang Fang1Lie Jin2Division of Nephrology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui Central Hospital, Lishui Hospital of Zhejiang University, Lishui, ChinaDivision of Nephrology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui Central Hospital, Lishui Hospital of Zhejiang University, Lishui, ChinaDivision of Nephrology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui Central Hospital, Lishui Hospital of Zhejiang University, Lishui, ChinaBackground Plasma volume (PV) calculated from hematocrit and body weight has applications in cardiovascular disease. The current study investigated the validity of the calculated PV for predicting volume overload and its prognostic utility in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD).Patients and methods Fifty-four HD patients were prospectively enrolled, and their actual PV (aPV) and relative PV status (PVS) were calculated. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) with assessment of and total body water (TBW), intracellular water (ICW), extracellular water (ECW), and overhydration (OH) and routine blood examinations were performed before dialysis. A second cohort of 164 HD patients was retrospectively enrolled to evaluate the relationship between the calculated PVS and the outcome, with an endpoint of all-cause mortality.Results aPV was significantly associated with TBW, ICW, ECW, OH, and ECW/TBW (all p < 0.001), and most strongly with ECW (r = 0.83). aPV predicted the extent of volume overload with an AUC of 0.770 (p < 0.001), but PVS did not (AUC = 0.617, p = 0.091). Median follow-up time was 53 months, during the course of which 60 (36.58%) patients died. Values for PVS (12.94 ± 10.87% vs. 7.45 ± 5.90%, p = 0.024) and time-averaged PVS (12.83 ± 11.20 vs. 6.78 ± 6.22%, p < 0.001) were significantly increased in patients who died relative to those who survived. A value of time-averaged PVS >8.72% was significantly associated with an increased incidence of all-cause mortality (HR = 2.48, p = 0.0023).Conclusions aPV was most strongly associated with ECW measured using BIA. HD patients with higher time-averaged PVS had a higher rate of all-cause mortality.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/0886022X.2024.2322685Calculated plasma volumehemodialysisbioelectrical impedance analysisvolume overloadall-cause mortality
spellingShingle Qiankun Zhang
Hang Fang
Lie Jin
Calculated plasma volume status in hemodialysis patients
Renal Failure
Calculated plasma volume
hemodialysis
bioelectrical impedance analysis
volume overload
all-cause mortality
title Calculated plasma volume status in hemodialysis patients
title_full Calculated plasma volume status in hemodialysis patients
title_fullStr Calculated plasma volume status in hemodialysis patients
title_full_unstemmed Calculated plasma volume status in hemodialysis patients
title_short Calculated plasma volume status in hemodialysis patients
title_sort calculated plasma volume status in hemodialysis patients
topic Calculated plasma volume
hemodialysis
bioelectrical impedance analysis
volume overload
all-cause mortality
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/0886022X.2024.2322685
work_keys_str_mv AT qiankunzhang calculatedplasmavolumestatusinhemodialysispatients
AT hangfang calculatedplasmavolumestatusinhemodialysispatients
AT liejin calculatedplasmavolumestatusinhemodialysispatients