Evaluation of the Canal Transportation Following Glide Path Preparation with Different Rotary Systems: A Comparative Study
Objectives. Ideal root canal shaping might be more challenging particularly in cases with severely curved canals or complex anatomical variations. Glide path preparation is suggested as a critical step to achieve ideal canal preparation. The present study is aimed at evaluating transportation at dif...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | The Scientific World Journal |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8087378 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832552894943985664 |
|---|---|
| author | Mohsen Aminsobhani Fatemeh Hamidzadeh Arvin Rezaei Avval Farid Merrikhi Ehsan Sadri |
| author_facet | Mohsen Aminsobhani Fatemeh Hamidzadeh Arvin Rezaei Avval Farid Merrikhi Ehsan Sadri |
| author_sort | Mohsen Aminsobhani |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objectives. Ideal root canal shaping might be more challenging particularly in cases with severely curved canals or complex anatomical variations. Glide path preparation is suggested as a critical step to achieve ideal canal preparation. The present study is aimed at evaluating transportation at different levels of the canal following glide path preparation by five different path finders. Materials and Methods. The study was conducted on 100 S-shaped canal simulator blocks. Glide path was prepared in five groups including (1) Scout RaCe (#10 and #15, 0.02), (2) One G (#14, 0.03), (3) PathFile (#13 and #16, 0.02), (4) GPS (#15, 0.03), and (5) K file (#15, 0.02) (Control group). The first four groups were NiTi rotary instruments, while the last group was a stainless steel hand file. The aforementioned files were used after canal negotiation by a #10 stainless steel hand file. Before- and after-preparation photos were taken and were superimposed in Adobe PhotoShop CC 2019. Transportation measurements were conducted in Digimizer. Absolute canal transportation was calculated at 10 cross-sections. Intergroup and intragroup data analysis were conducted using one-way and repeated measures ANOVA tests, respectively, in SPSS 26.0. The significance level was set to 0.05. Results. Although K file led to significantly more transportation in the apical and middle thirds (p<0.001), rotary groups were not statistically different. In the coronal third, K files led to significantly more transportation compared to Scout RaCe and PathFile (p<0.05). Conclusion. Within the limitations of the present study, regardless of the recruited rotary system, glide path preparation using NiTi rotary instruments leads to less canal transportation compared to stainless steel hand files. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-1124d102eaf8421e8000817118dba5b5 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1537-744X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | The Scientific World Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-1124d102eaf8421e8000817118dba5b52025-02-03T05:57:28ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2022-01-01202210.1155/2022/8087378Evaluation of the Canal Transportation Following Glide Path Preparation with Different Rotary Systems: A Comparative StudyMohsen Aminsobhani0Fatemeh Hamidzadeh1Arvin Rezaei Avval2Farid Merrikhi3Ehsan Sadri4Faculty of DentistryDepartment of EndodonticsDepartment of EndodonticsFaculty of DentistryDepartment of PhysicsObjectives. Ideal root canal shaping might be more challenging particularly in cases with severely curved canals or complex anatomical variations. Glide path preparation is suggested as a critical step to achieve ideal canal preparation. The present study is aimed at evaluating transportation at different levels of the canal following glide path preparation by five different path finders. Materials and Methods. The study was conducted on 100 S-shaped canal simulator blocks. Glide path was prepared in five groups including (1) Scout RaCe (#10 and #15, 0.02), (2) One G (#14, 0.03), (3) PathFile (#13 and #16, 0.02), (4) GPS (#15, 0.03), and (5) K file (#15, 0.02) (Control group). The first four groups were NiTi rotary instruments, while the last group was a stainless steel hand file. The aforementioned files were used after canal negotiation by a #10 stainless steel hand file. Before- and after-preparation photos were taken and were superimposed in Adobe PhotoShop CC 2019. Transportation measurements were conducted in Digimizer. Absolute canal transportation was calculated at 10 cross-sections. Intergroup and intragroup data analysis were conducted using one-way and repeated measures ANOVA tests, respectively, in SPSS 26.0. The significance level was set to 0.05. Results. Although K file led to significantly more transportation in the apical and middle thirds (p<0.001), rotary groups were not statistically different. In the coronal third, K files led to significantly more transportation compared to Scout RaCe and PathFile (p<0.05). Conclusion. Within the limitations of the present study, regardless of the recruited rotary system, glide path preparation using NiTi rotary instruments leads to less canal transportation compared to stainless steel hand files.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8087378 |
| spellingShingle | Mohsen Aminsobhani Fatemeh Hamidzadeh Arvin Rezaei Avval Farid Merrikhi Ehsan Sadri Evaluation of the Canal Transportation Following Glide Path Preparation with Different Rotary Systems: A Comparative Study The Scientific World Journal |
| title | Evaluation of the Canal Transportation Following Glide Path Preparation with Different Rotary Systems: A Comparative Study |
| title_full | Evaluation of the Canal Transportation Following Glide Path Preparation with Different Rotary Systems: A Comparative Study |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Canal Transportation Following Glide Path Preparation with Different Rotary Systems: A Comparative Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Canal Transportation Following Glide Path Preparation with Different Rotary Systems: A Comparative Study |
| title_short | Evaluation of the Canal Transportation Following Glide Path Preparation with Different Rotary Systems: A Comparative Study |
| title_sort | evaluation of the canal transportation following glide path preparation with different rotary systems a comparative study |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8087378 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mohsenaminsobhani evaluationofthecanaltransportationfollowingglidepathpreparationwithdifferentrotarysystemsacomparativestudy AT fatemehhamidzadeh evaluationofthecanaltransportationfollowingglidepathpreparationwithdifferentrotarysystemsacomparativestudy AT arvinrezaeiavval evaluationofthecanaltransportationfollowingglidepathpreparationwithdifferentrotarysystemsacomparativestudy AT faridmerrikhi evaluationofthecanaltransportationfollowingglidepathpreparationwithdifferentrotarysystemsacomparativestudy AT ehsansadri evaluationofthecanaltransportationfollowingglidepathpreparationwithdifferentrotarysystemsacomparativestudy |