Comparative analysis of Microsoft’s ,,low-code” programming technology

According to various investigations, ‘low code’ platforms will form a large part of software development’s market in the future. In that research paper was executed a comparison of Power Fx language functions: Patch, UpdateIf, SubmitForm and graphical interfaces, which allow making applications in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Grzegorz Łopata, Konrad Gromaszek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lublin University of Technology 2024-06-01
Series:Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/jcsi/article/view/6075
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832569979363393536
author Grzegorz Łopata
Konrad Gromaszek
author_facet Grzegorz Łopata
Konrad Gromaszek
author_sort Grzegorz Łopata
collection DOAJ
description According to various investigations, ‘low code’ platforms will form a large part of software development’s market in the future. In that research paper was executed a comparison of Power Fx language functions: Patch, UpdateIf, SubmitForm and graphical interfaces, which allow making applications in Power Apps, were subjected to analysis. Research paper has shown that the average time of data recording into Dataverse using Patch function was slightly shorter than using SubmitForm. Moreover, it was found, that the average time required by the test group for creation Model – Driven app was 40% less than the average time for creation Canvas app and was demonstrated that a graphical interface, which enables making Power Apps Canvas is more efficient than Model – Driven graphical interface.
format Article
id doaj-art-10a63c816f0a40fea8ace62b3a8c5c80
institution Kabale University
issn 2544-0764
language English
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher Lublin University of Technology
record_format Article
series Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
spelling doaj-art-10a63c816f0a40fea8ace62b3a8c5c802025-02-02T18:01:29ZengLublin University of TechnologyJournal of Computer Sciences Institute2544-07642024-06-013110.35784/jcsi.6075Comparative analysis of Microsoft’s ,,low-code” programming technologyGrzegorz Łopata0Konrad Gromaszek1Lublin University of TechnologyLublin University of Technology According to various investigations, ‘low code’ platforms will form a large part of software development’s market in the future. In that research paper was executed a comparison of Power Fx language functions: Patch, UpdateIf, SubmitForm and graphical interfaces, which allow making applications in Power Apps, were subjected to analysis. Research paper has shown that the average time of data recording into Dataverse using Patch function was slightly shorter than using SubmitForm. Moreover, it was found, that the average time required by the test group for creation Model – Driven app was 40% less than the average time for creation Canvas app and was demonstrated that a graphical interface, which enables making Power Apps Canvas is more efficient than Model – Driven graphical interface. https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/jcsi/article/view/6075comparative analysislow-codeMicrosoftDataverse
spellingShingle Grzegorz Łopata
Konrad Gromaszek
Comparative analysis of Microsoft’s ,,low-code” programming technology
Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
comparative analysis
low-code
Microsoft
Dataverse
title Comparative analysis of Microsoft’s ,,low-code” programming technology
title_full Comparative analysis of Microsoft’s ,,low-code” programming technology
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of Microsoft’s ,,low-code” programming technology
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of Microsoft’s ,,low-code” programming technology
title_short Comparative analysis of Microsoft’s ,,low-code” programming technology
title_sort comparative analysis of microsoft s low code programming technology
topic comparative analysis
low-code
Microsoft
Dataverse
url https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/jcsi/article/view/6075
work_keys_str_mv AT grzegorzłopata comparativeanalysisofmicrosoftslowcodeprogrammingtechnology
AT konradgromaszek comparativeanalysisofmicrosoftslowcodeprogrammingtechnology