Rethinking Gender and Epistemic Injustice: A Comparative Study of Male and Female Breast Cancer Memoirs

Breast cancer patients’ experiences of epistemic injustice in healthcare is a well-established fact. However, the significant role that gender plays in deciding the nature of epistemic injustice encountered by male and female breast cancer patients is still underexplored. Through a comparative analy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mahua Bhattacharyya, Ajit K Mishra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Humanities
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/14/1/15
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832588324759404544
author Mahua Bhattacharyya
Ajit K Mishra
author_facet Mahua Bhattacharyya
Ajit K Mishra
author_sort Mahua Bhattacharyya
collection DOAJ
description Breast cancer patients’ experiences of epistemic injustice in healthcare is a well-established fact. However, the significant role that gender plays in deciding the nature of epistemic injustice encountered by male and female breast cancer patients is still underexplored. Through a comparative analysis of Alan F. Herbert’s <i>The Pink Unicorns of Male Breast Cancer</i> (2016) and Nina Riggs’ <i>The Bright Hour: A Memoir of Living and Dying</i> (2017), we explore how male and female breast cancer patients distinctly experience vitiated testimonial dynamics and hermeneutical marginalisation. Breast cancer patients can negotiate credibility deficit, identity crisis, and existential crisis caused by epistemic injustice through narrating. Taking from Fricker’s epistemic injustice, later contextualised in formal healthcare by Kidd and Carel, this study considers both the male and the female points of view to identify subtle instances of injustice and ways to overcome it. This article also articulates the need to overcome the stigma of considering breast cancer ‘a woman’s disease’ so that male breast cancer patients’ testimonies are equally prioritised along with female breast cancer patients. This comparative study highlights the ignorance inside institutional healthcare by foregrounding insensitivity toward all breast cancer patients and especially a lack of awareness of male breast cancer. Therefore, reading and writing such memoirs might secure future epistemic justice to all breast cancer patients irrespective of their gender.
format Article
id doaj-art-1090d9a734be4058a1a8a29a0d75f0e3
institution Kabale University
issn 2076-0787
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Humanities
spelling doaj-art-1090d9a734be4058a1a8a29a0d75f0e32025-01-24T13:34:51ZengMDPI AGHumanities2076-07872025-01-011411510.3390/h14010015Rethinking Gender and Epistemic Injustice: A Comparative Study of Male and Female Breast Cancer MemoirsMahua Bhattacharyya0Ajit K Mishra1Department of Basic Science and Humanities, University of Engineering and Management, Kolkata 700160, IndiaDepartment of Humanistic Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU) Varanasi, Varanasi 221005, IndiaBreast cancer patients’ experiences of epistemic injustice in healthcare is a well-established fact. However, the significant role that gender plays in deciding the nature of epistemic injustice encountered by male and female breast cancer patients is still underexplored. Through a comparative analysis of Alan F. Herbert’s <i>The Pink Unicorns of Male Breast Cancer</i> (2016) and Nina Riggs’ <i>The Bright Hour: A Memoir of Living and Dying</i> (2017), we explore how male and female breast cancer patients distinctly experience vitiated testimonial dynamics and hermeneutical marginalisation. Breast cancer patients can negotiate credibility deficit, identity crisis, and existential crisis caused by epistemic injustice through narrating. Taking from Fricker’s epistemic injustice, later contextualised in formal healthcare by Kidd and Carel, this study considers both the male and the female points of view to identify subtle instances of injustice and ways to overcome it. This article also articulates the need to overcome the stigma of considering breast cancer ‘a woman’s disease’ so that male breast cancer patients’ testimonies are equally prioritised along with female breast cancer patients. This comparative study highlights the ignorance inside institutional healthcare by foregrounding insensitivity toward all breast cancer patients and especially a lack of awareness of male breast cancer. Therefore, reading and writing such memoirs might secure future epistemic justice to all breast cancer patients irrespective of their gender.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/14/1/15epistemic injusticegendermarginalisationbreast cancerwoman’s diseaseinsensitivity
spellingShingle Mahua Bhattacharyya
Ajit K Mishra
Rethinking Gender and Epistemic Injustice: A Comparative Study of Male and Female Breast Cancer Memoirs
Humanities
epistemic injustice
gender
marginalisation
breast cancer
woman’s disease
insensitivity
title Rethinking Gender and Epistemic Injustice: A Comparative Study of Male and Female Breast Cancer Memoirs
title_full Rethinking Gender and Epistemic Injustice: A Comparative Study of Male and Female Breast Cancer Memoirs
title_fullStr Rethinking Gender and Epistemic Injustice: A Comparative Study of Male and Female Breast Cancer Memoirs
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking Gender and Epistemic Injustice: A Comparative Study of Male and Female Breast Cancer Memoirs
title_short Rethinking Gender and Epistemic Injustice: A Comparative Study of Male and Female Breast Cancer Memoirs
title_sort rethinking gender and epistemic injustice a comparative study of male and female breast cancer memoirs
topic epistemic injustice
gender
marginalisation
breast cancer
woman’s disease
insensitivity
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/14/1/15
work_keys_str_mv AT mahuabhattacharyya rethinkinggenderandepistemicinjusticeacomparativestudyofmaleandfemalebreastcancermemoirs
AT ajitkmishra rethinkinggenderandepistemicinjusticeacomparativestudyofmaleandfemalebreastcancermemoirs