Can Spinal Bupivacaine Analgesia Treatment Make a Difference on Urinary Bladder Healing According to the Intramuscular Pethidine Analgesia Treatment in Rats?

We designed a study to compare the healing levels found with intramuscular pethidine with those found with intrathecal local anesthetic treatments. The urinary bladder is suggested to be the most useful tissue in the evaluation of the effects of the drugs. Nineteen male, Sprague-Dawley rats weighing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yeswim Senayli, Atilla Senayli, R. Dogan Koseoglu, Ziya Kaya, Fatih Özkan, Ilker Etikan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2007-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2007.284
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832550676675166208
author Yeswim Senayli
Atilla Senayli
R. Dogan Koseoglu
Ziya Kaya
Fatih Özkan
Ilker Etikan
author_facet Yeswim Senayli
Atilla Senayli
R. Dogan Koseoglu
Ziya Kaya
Fatih Özkan
Ilker Etikan
author_sort Yeswim Senayli
collection DOAJ
description We designed a study to compare the healing levels found with intramuscular pethidine with those found with intrathecal local anesthetic treatments. The urinary bladder is suggested to be the most useful tissue in the evaluation of the effects of the drugs. Nineteen male, Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 200–300 g were used in this study. A sagittal section was made in the urinary bladder after suitable anesthesia and laparotomy. Bladders were closed with 5-0 plain catguts 5 min later. There were nine rats in the control group and pethidine (0.5 g/kg) was administered intramuscularly in the gluteal muscle region to treat pain after the operations. There were 11 rats in the study group and each received a spinal injection of 0.25% bupivacaine after the operation. Rats were followed for 7 days to define pain. Specimens, particularly the incised region of the bladder, were evaluated for inflammation and fibrosis. Grading scales were used for this purpose. Statistical analyses of the data were performed using the Chi-square test. Statistical analyses were nonsignificant for inflammation (p ≤ 0.151) and nonsignificant for fibrosis (p ≤ 0.105). The treatments may have the same effects on organ healing mechanisms. Statistical difference is not shown in this study, but use of other combinations of pain treatments to evaluate the healing may demonstrate which of these possibilities is true.
format Article
id doaj-art-1069cab5e2d049ac9e05edff958434e4
institution Kabale University
issn 1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2007-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-1069cab5e2d049ac9e05edff958434e42025-02-03T06:05:58ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2007-01-0171869187410.1100/tsw.2007.284Can Spinal Bupivacaine Analgesia Treatment Make a Difference on Urinary Bladder Healing According to the Intramuscular Pethidine Analgesia Treatment in Rats?Yeswim Senayli0Atilla Senayli1R. Dogan Koseoglu2Ziya Kaya3Fatih Özkan4Ilker Etikan5Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department , Gaziosmanpaşa University, Medicine Faculty, Tokat, TurkeyPediatric Surgery Department, Gaziosmanpaşa University, Medicine Faculty, Tokat, TurkeyPathology Department, Gaziosmanpaşa University, Medicine Faculty, Tokat, TurkeyAnesthesiology and Reanimation Department , Gaziosmanpaşa University, Medicine Faculty, Tokat, TurkeyAnesthesiology and Reanimation Department , Gaziosmanpaşa University, Medicine Faculty, Tokat, TurkeyBiostatistics Department, Gaziosmanpaşa University, Medicine Faculty, Tokat, TurkeyWe designed a study to compare the healing levels found with intramuscular pethidine with those found with intrathecal local anesthetic treatments. The urinary bladder is suggested to be the most useful tissue in the evaluation of the effects of the drugs. Nineteen male, Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 200–300 g were used in this study. A sagittal section was made in the urinary bladder after suitable anesthesia and laparotomy. Bladders were closed with 5-0 plain catguts 5 min later. There were nine rats in the control group and pethidine (0.5 g/kg) was administered intramuscularly in the gluteal muscle region to treat pain after the operations. There were 11 rats in the study group and each received a spinal injection of 0.25% bupivacaine after the operation. Rats were followed for 7 days to define pain. Specimens, particularly the incised region of the bladder, were evaluated for inflammation and fibrosis. Grading scales were used for this purpose. Statistical analyses of the data were performed using the Chi-square test. Statistical analyses were nonsignificant for inflammation (p ≤ 0.151) and nonsignificant for fibrosis (p ≤ 0.105). The treatments may have the same effects on organ healing mechanisms. Statistical difference is not shown in this study, but use of other combinations of pain treatments to evaluate the healing may demonstrate which of these possibilities is true.http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2007.284
spellingShingle Yeswim Senayli
Atilla Senayli
R. Dogan Koseoglu
Ziya Kaya
Fatih Özkan
Ilker Etikan
Can Spinal Bupivacaine Analgesia Treatment Make a Difference on Urinary Bladder Healing According to the Intramuscular Pethidine Analgesia Treatment in Rats?
The Scientific World Journal
title Can Spinal Bupivacaine Analgesia Treatment Make a Difference on Urinary Bladder Healing According to the Intramuscular Pethidine Analgesia Treatment in Rats?
title_full Can Spinal Bupivacaine Analgesia Treatment Make a Difference on Urinary Bladder Healing According to the Intramuscular Pethidine Analgesia Treatment in Rats?
title_fullStr Can Spinal Bupivacaine Analgesia Treatment Make a Difference on Urinary Bladder Healing According to the Intramuscular Pethidine Analgesia Treatment in Rats?
title_full_unstemmed Can Spinal Bupivacaine Analgesia Treatment Make a Difference on Urinary Bladder Healing According to the Intramuscular Pethidine Analgesia Treatment in Rats?
title_short Can Spinal Bupivacaine Analgesia Treatment Make a Difference on Urinary Bladder Healing According to the Intramuscular Pethidine Analgesia Treatment in Rats?
title_sort can spinal bupivacaine analgesia treatment make a difference on urinary bladder healing according to the intramuscular pethidine analgesia treatment in rats
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2007.284
work_keys_str_mv AT yeswimsenayli canspinalbupivacaineanalgesiatreatmentmakeadifferenceonurinarybladderhealingaccordingtotheintramuscularpethidineanalgesiatreatmentinrats
AT atillasenayli canspinalbupivacaineanalgesiatreatmentmakeadifferenceonurinarybladderhealingaccordingtotheintramuscularpethidineanalgesiatreatmentinrats
AT rdogankoseoglu canspinalbupivacaineanalgesiatreatmentmakeadifferenceonurinarybladderhealingaccordingtotheintramuscularpethidineanalgesiatreatmentinrats
AT ziyakaya canspinalbupivacaineanalgesiatreatmentmakeadifferenceonurinarybladderhealingaccordingtotheintramuscularpethidineanalgesiatreatmentinrats
AT fatihozkan canspinalbupivacaineanalgesiatreatmentmakeadifferenceonurinarybladderhealingaccordingtotheintramuscularpethidineanalgesiatreatmentinrats
AT ilkeretikan canspinalbupivacaineanalgesiatreatmentmakeadifferenceonurinarybladderhealingaccordingtotheintramuscularpethidineanalgesiatreatmentinrats