Survey of Accepted Practice following Failed Intubation for Emergency Caesarean Delivery

Background. There is no consensus on the optimum management of failed tracheal intubation in emergency cesarean delivery performed for fetal compromise. The decision making process on whether to wake the patient or continue anesthesia with a supraglottic airway device is an underexplored area. This...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Soltanifar, David Bogod, Sally Harrison, Brendan Carvalho, Pervez Sultan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015-01-01
Series:Anesthesiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/192315
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832567705149898752
author Daniel Soltanifar
David Bogod
Sally Harrison
Brendan Carvalho
Pervez Sultan
author_facet Daniel Soltanifar
David Bogod
Sally Harrison
Brendan Carvalho
Pervez Sultan
author_sort Daniel Soltanifar
collection DOAJ
description Background. There is no consensus on the optimum management of failed tracheal intubation in emergency cesarean delivery performed for fetal compromise. The decision making process on whether to wake the patient or continue anesthesia with a supraglottic airway device is an underexplored area. This survey explores perceptions and experiences of obstetric anesthetists managing failed intubation. Methods. Anesthetists attending the Group of Obstetric Anaesthetists London (GOAL) Meeting in April 2014 were surveyed. Results. Ninety-three percent of anesthetists surveyed would not always wake the patient in the event of failed intubation for emergency cesarean delivery performed for fetal compromise. The median (interquartile range) of perceived acceptability of continuing anesthesia with a well-fitting supraglottic airway device, assessed using a visual analogue scale (0–100; 0 completely unacceptable; 100 completely acceptable), was 90 [22.5]. Preoperative patient consent regarding the use of a supraglottic airway device for surgery in the event of failed intubation would affect the decision making of 40% of anaesthetists surveyed. Conclusion. These results demonstrate that a significant body of anesthetists with a subspecialty interest in obstetric anesthesia in the UK would not always wake up the patient and would continue with anesthesia and surgery with a supraglottic airway device in this setting.
format Article
id doaj-art-103dcc1f3eb44370929ace9a1c9142bb
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6962
1687-6970
language English
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Anesthesiology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-103dcc1f3eb44370929ace9a1c9142bb2025-02-03T01:00:38ZengWileyAnesthesiology Research and Practice1687-69621687-69702015-01-01201510.1155/2015/192315192315Survey of Accepted Practice following Failed Intubation for Emergency Caesarean DeliveryDaniel Soltanifar0David Bogod1Sally Harrison2Brendan Carvalho3Pervez Sultan4Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UKNottingham City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UKRoyal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UKStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USAUniversity College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UKBackground. There is no consensus on the optimum management of failed tracheal intubation in emergency cesarean delivery performed for fetal compromise. The decision making process on whether to wake the patient or continue anesthesia with a supraglottic airway device is an underexplored area. This survey explores perceptions and experiences of obstetric anesthetists managing failed intubation. Methods. Anesthetists attending the Group of Obstetric Anaesthetists London (GOAL) Meeting in April 2014 were surveyed. Results. Ninety-three percent of anesthetists surveyed would not always wake the patient in the event of failed intubation for emergency cesarean delivery performed for fetal compromise. The median (interquartile range) of perceived acceptability of continuing anesthesia with a well-fitting supraglottic airway device, assessed using a visual analogue scale (0–100; 0 completely unacceptable; 100 completely acceptable), was 90 [22.5]. Preoperative patient consent regarding the use of a supraglottic airway device for surgery in the event of failed intubation would affect the decision making of 40% of anaesthetists surveyed. Conclusion. These results demonstrate that a significant body of anesthetists with a subspecialty interest in obstetric anesthesia in the UK would not always wake up the patient and would continue with anesthesia and surgery with a supraglottic airway device in this setting.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/192315
spellingShingle Daniel Soltanifar
David Bogod
Sally Harrison
Brendan Carvalho
Pervez Sultan
Survey of Accepted Practice following Failed Intubation for Emergency Caesarean Delivery
Anesthesiology Research and Practice
title Survey of Accepted Practice following Failed Intubation for Emergency Caesarean Delivery
title_full Survey of Accepted Practice following Failed Intubation for Emergency Caesarean Delivery
title_fullStr Survey of Accepted Practice following Failed Intubation for Emergency Caesarean Delivery
title_full_unstemmed Survey of Accepted Practice following Failed Intubation for Emergency Caesarean Delivery
title_short Survey of Accepted Practice following Failed Intubation for Emergency Caesarean Delivery
title_sort survey of accepted practice following failed intubation for emergency caesarean delivery
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/192315
work_keys_str_mv AT danielsoltanifar surveyofacceptedpracticefollowingfailedintubationforemergencycaesareandelivery
AT davidbogod surveyofacceptedpracticefollowingfailedintubationforemergencycaesareandelivery
AT sallyharrison surveyofacceptedpracticefollowingfailedintubationforemergencycaesareandelivery
AT brendancarvalho surveyofacceptedpracticefollowingfailedintubationforemergencycaesareandelivery
AT pervezsultan surveyofacceptedpracticefollowingfailedintubationforemergencycaesareandelivery