Paper-work: what module guides have to say about assessment practices
Documents are usually circulated as carriers of transparent information. They can serve as evidence of accountability. In fact, they embody the most desired value of managerialism, where the culture of audit and compliance is fully served and delivered in written and textual form. This article expl...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Liverpool John Moores University
2020-09-01
|
| Series: | PRISM |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/prism/article/view/369 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832557686536798208 |
|---|---|
| author | Judith Enriquez |
| author_facet | Judith Enriquez |
| author_sort | Judith Enriquez |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Documents are usually circulated as carriers of transparent information. They can serve as evidence of accountability. In fact, they embody the most desired value of managerialism, where the culture of audit and compliance is fully served and delivered in written and textual form. This article explores assessment by attending to its principal instrument – the document – through which it is organised, monitored and implemented in higher education. It is an invitation to ‘see’ what documents, such as, module guides, ‘do’ for universities and the assessment practices of academics. Under close scrutiny, documents ‘do’ more than record and transfer information. Their associated paper-work expresses and reproduces norms, patterns of thoughts and work habits that are accepted and assumed to be shared in the prevailing outcome-based assessment systems of higher education. This article provides a critical account based on practice-oriented and material-semiotic approaches to assessment. It bears witness to the past and persistent norms and standards that are shaped by documents, paper-work, control, compliance and surveillance and less by pedagogical and student engagement.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-101a157b3464415c8c66eddb947cd778 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2514-5347 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-09-01 |
| publisher | Liverpool John Moores University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PRISM |
| spelling | doaj-art-101a157b3464415c8c66eddb947cd7782025-02-03T03:18:10ZengLiverpool John Moores UniversityPRISM2514-53472020-09-0131Paper-work: what module guides have to say about assessment practicesJudith Enriquez0Liverpool John Moores University Documents are usually circulated as carriers of transparent information. They can serve as evidence of accountability. In fact, they embody the most desired value of managerialism, where the culture of audit and compliance is fully served and delivered in written and textual form. This article explores assessment by attending to its principal instrument – the document – through which it is organised, monitored and implemented in higher education. It is an invitation to ‘see’ what documents, such as, module guides, ‘do’ for universities and the assessment practices of academics. Under close scrutiny, documents ‘do’ more than record and transfer information. Their associated paper-work expresses and reproduces norms, patterns of thoughts and work habits that are accepted and assumed to be shared in the prevailing outcome-based assessment systems of higher education. This article provides a critical account based on practice-oriented and material-semiotic approaches to assessment. It bears witness to the past and persistent norms and standards that are shaped by documents, paper-work, control, compliance and surveillance and less by pedagogical and student engagement. https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/prism/article/view/369social practicedocument analysisoutcome-based assessmentBloom's taxonomyintended learning outcomes |
| spellingShingle | Judith Enriquez Paper-work: what module guides have to say about assessment practices PRISM social practice document analysis outcome-based assessment Bloom's taxonomy intended learning outcomes |
| title | Paper-work: what module guides have to say about assessment practices |
| title_full | Paper-work: what module guides have to say about assessment practices |
| title_fullStr | Paper-work: what module guides have to say about assessment practices |
| title_full_unstemmed | Paper-work: what module guides have to say about assessment practices |
| title_short | Paper-work: what module guides have to say about assessment practices |
| title_sort | paper work what module guides have to say about assessment practices |
| topic | social practice document analysis outcome-based assessment Bloom's taxonomy intended learning outcomes |
| url | https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/prism/article/view/369 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT judithenriquez paperworkwhatmoduleguideshavetosayaboutassessmentpractices |