Comment On ‘Comparative analysis of LMA Blockbuster® clinical performance: Blind versus Miller laryngoscope-guided insertion in paediatric general anaesthesia – A double-blinded, randomised controlled trial’
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Mamta Rana, Neeti Dogra |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
|
Series: | Indian Journal of Anaesthesia |
Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ija.ija_986_24 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Reply to comments on “Comparative analysis of LMA Blockbuster® clinical performance: Blind versus Miller laryngoscope-guided insertion in paediatric general anaesthesia – A double-blinded, randomised controlled trial”
by: Pooja Bihani, et al. -
Thoracic spinal anaesthesia – An effective alternative to general anaesthesia in breast surgeries: A randomised, non-blinded study
by: G. S. Karthik, et al. -
Paediatric Anaesthesia /
by: Davenport,Harold T.
Published: (1982) -
Phantom motor execution as a treatment for phantom limb pain: protocol of an international, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial
by: Brian E McGuire, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01) -
Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Manual and Electric Toothbrushes in Blind Children: A Randomised Controlled Trial
by: PS Thanalakshme, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01)