Understanding ChatGPT: Impact Analysis and Path Forward for Teaching Computer Science and Engineering
Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT have become the most popular regenerative AI applications, used for obtaining responses for queries in different domains. The responses of ChatGPT are already becoming mainstream and are challenging conventional methods of learning. This article focuses on t...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IEEE
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | IEEE Access |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10833612/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT have become the most popular regenerative AI applications, used for obtaining responses for queries in different domains. The responses of ChatGPT are already becoming mainstream and are challenging conventional methods of learning. This article focuses on the application of ChatGPT for academic instructional purposes in the field of computer engineering and related majors. The capability of ChatGPT for instructional purposes is evaluated based on the responses to different questions about these engineering streams. This article explores different opportunities (with use cases), that ChatGPT can provide in augmenting the learning experience. It also provides scenarios of limitations and modifying the evaluation process to prevent the use of ChatGPT, which may lead to an inaccurate dissemination of accepted facts. In this paper, common classroom problems and their respective responses from ChatGPT in the domains of Computer Science, Cyber Security, Data Science, and Electrical Engineering are analyzed to determine the categories of queries for which ChatGPT offers reliable responses and those for which it may be factually incorrect. A student survey is performed to demonstrate that students must be made aware that ChatGPT may not be suitable for certain types of queries and means of upgrading the evaluation process. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2169-3536 |