Impacts of an energy sparing feed additive on turkeys fed titrating reduced energy diets
Providing amino acids, energy, and minerals are costly dietary components in formulating diets for turkeys, with corn, soybean meal, and oils being of utmost interest due to their percent inclusion levels. In addition, the highest feed consumption occurs in the grower-finisher (GF) phase of producti...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Poultry Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579125002858 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850136952984043520 |
|---|---|
| author | Brooke A. Wilson Brian J. Kerr Brett C. Ramirez Dawn A. Koltes |
| author_facet | Brooke A. Wilson Brian J. Kerr Brett C. Ramirez Dawn A. Koltes |
| author_sort | Brooke A. Wilson |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Providing amino acids, energy, and minerals are costly dietary components in formulating diets for turkeys, with corn, soybean meal, and oils being of utmost interest due to their percent inclusion levels. In addition, the highest feed consumption occurs in the grower-finisher (GF) phase of production making diet formulation during this period of growth critically important. Reducing feed cost through reductions in expensive energy sources (e.g., fats) in a turkey diet while maintaining performance and carcass traits could greatly benefit turkey production profitability. The current study evaluated the effects of the addition of a commercial energy sparing feed additive (Enercore®, Biosen LLC) in a series of reducing energy diets. Dietary treatments included a commercial control diet (CON) and 3 experimental diets with different levels of reduced Kcal to equal a 50 Kcal/kg deficit (ESFA 1), 70 Kcal/kg deficit (ESFA 2), and 100 Kcal/kg deficit (ESFA 3) with the inclusion of 1 kg/tonne of Enercore. At placement, 1,800 male turkeys were evenly placed across dietary treatments (n = 8 per treatment) and provided their dietary treatment through 18 wk of age. Body weights and feed weights were taken every 5 wk and before loadout. At 17 wk of age, one tom per pen was weighed and euthanized to determine breast yield and deboned thigh yield. Body weights and mortality percent were similar across diets at the end of 18 wk of age (P > 0.140). Whereas, mortality-adjusted FCR was altered with dietary treatment with toms fed ESFA 2 having the lowest mortality-adjusted FCR (P < 0.001) compared to all other dietary treatments. For carcass measurements, live weights of birds sampled, breast yield, and deboned thigh yield were similar between treatments (P > 0.220). In conclusion, removal of 50 and 70 Kcal/kg of energy in turkey diets supplemented with an energy sparing feed additive did not significantly alter body weight or carcass yield but only the removal of 70 Kcal/kg with the ESFA, Enercore®, improved feed conversion. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-0d8ceb8bcc8c4e4d9707ebe2de90e72d |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 0032-5791 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Poultry Science |
| spelling | doaj-art-0d8ceb8bcc8c4e4d9707ebe2de90e72d2025-08-20T02:30:59ZengElsevierPoultry Science0032-57912025-05-01104510504610.1016/j.psj.2025.105046Impacts of an energy sparing feed additive on turkeys fed titrating reduced energy dietsBrooke A. Wilson0Brian J. Kerr1Brett C. Ramirez2Dawn A. Koltes3Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USAUSDA-ARS-National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames, IA, 50011, USADepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA; Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USADepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA; Corresponding author.Providing amino acids, energy, and minerals are costly dietary components in formulating diets for turkeys, with corn, soybean meal, and oils being of utmost interest due to their percent inclusion levels. In addition, the highest feed consumption occurs in the grower-finisher (GF) phase of production making diet formulation during this period of growth critically important. Reducing feed cost through reductions in expensive energy sources (e.g., fats) in a turkey diet while maintaining performance and carcass traits could greatly benefit turkey production profitability. The current study evaluated the effects of the addition of a commercial energy sparing feed additive (Enercore®, Biosen LLC) in a series of reducing energy diets. Dietary treatments included a commercial control diet (CON) and 3 experimental diets with different levels of reduced Kcal to equal a 50 Kcal/kg deficit (ESFA 1), 70 Kcal/kg deficit (ESFA 2), and 100 Kcal/kg deficit (ESFA 3) with the inclusion of 1 kg/tonne of Enercore. At placement, 1,800 male turkeys were evenly placed across dietary treatments (n = 8 per treatment) and provided their dietary treatment through 18 wk of age. Body weights and feed weights were taken every 5 wk and before loadout. At 17 wk of age, one tom per pen was weighed and euthanized to determine breast yield and deboned thigh yield. Body weights and mortality percent were similar across diets at the end of 18 wk of age (P > 0.140). Whereas, mortality-adjusted FCR was altered with dietary treatment with toms fed ESFA 2 having the lowest mortality-adjusted FCR (P < 0.001) compared to all other dietary treatments. For carcass measurements, live weights of birds sampled, breast yield, and deboned thigh yield were similar between treatments (P > 0.220). In conclusion, removal of 50 and 70 Kcal/kg of energy in turkey diets supplemented with an energy sparing feed additive did not significantly alter body weight or carcass yield but only the removal of 70 Kcal/kg with the ESFA, Enercore®, improved feed conversion.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579125002858LipidGluconeogenicTurkeyPerformanceCarcass |
| spellingShingle | Brooke A. Wilson Brian J. Kerr Brett C. Ramirez Dawn A. Koltes Impacts of an energy sparing feed additive on turkeys fed titrating reduced energy diets Poultry Science Lipid Gluconeogenic Turkey Performance Carcass |
| title | Impacts of an energy sparing feed additive on turkeys fed titrating reduced energy diets |
| title_full | Impacts of an energy sparing feed additive on turkeys fed titrating reduced energy diets |
| title_fullStr | Impacts of an energy sparing feed additive on turkeys fed titrating reduced energy diets |
| title_full_unstemmed | Impacts of an energy sparing feed additive on turkeys fed titrating reduced energy diets |
| title_short | Impacts of an energy sparing feed additive on turkeys fed titrating reduced energy diets |
| title_sort | impacts of an energy sparing feed additive on turkeys fed titrating reduced energy diets |
| topic | Lipid Gluconeogenic Turkey Performance Carcass |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579125002858 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT brookeawilson impactsofanenergysparingfeedadditiveonturkeysfedtitratingreducedenergydiets AT brianjkerr impactsofanenergysparingfeedadditiveonturkeysfedtitratingreducedenergydiets AT brettcramirez impactsofanenergysparingfeedadditiveonturkeysfedtitratingreducedenergydiets AT dawnakoltes impactsofanenergysparingfeedadditiveonturkeysfedtitratingreducedenergydiets |