Comparative evaluation of several toric intraocular lens calculators for predicting postoperative refractive astigmatism in cataract surgery: a real-world study

Abstract Background This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the predictive accuracy of six widely used toric intraocular lens (IOL) calculators in eyes undergoing cataract surgery with toric IOL implantation. Methods This retrospective study reviewed 53 eyes of 53 patients that underwent catarac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haocheng Xian, Bingzhen Li, Ziyao Xia, Chun Zhang, Xuemin Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-03856-9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585893527945216
author Haocheng Xian
Bingzhen Li
Ziyao Xia
Chun Zhang
Xuemin Li
author_facet Haocheng Xian
Bingzhen Li
Ziyao Xia
Chun Zhang
Xuemin Li
author_sort Haocheng Xian
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the predictive accuracy of six widely used toric intraocular lens (IOL) calculators in eyes undergoing cataract surgery with toric IOL implantation. Methods This retrospective study reviewed 53 eyes of 53 patients that underwent cataract extraction with toric IOL implantation using Zeiss 709 M. Six toric IOL calculators were evaluated: Barrett toric calculator (with predicted PCA, measured PCA, and TK), Kane formula (predicted PCA), and EVO 2.0 formula (predicted and measured PCA). Postoperative refractive astigmatism prediction errors were comprehensively calculated and analyzed using vector analysis. Results The mean absolute prediction error (APE) ranged from 0.56 ± 0.37 D (Barrett TK) to 0.63 ± 0.46 D (Barrett predicted PCA, PPCA). The proportions of eyes achieving APE ≤ 1.0 D were highest for Barrett TK and Kane predicted PCA (90.6%). The highest proportions of eyes achieving APE ≤ 0.25 D and ≤ 0.50 D were observed with Barrett measured PCA (18.9% and 56.6%, respectively), while the lowest with Barrett PPCA (9.4% and 50.9%, respectively). The study found no statistically significant differences in mean absolute prediction error (APE) among the six calculators (χ² = 6.88, P = 0.23) and the centroid of PE (P = 0.93). A difference in mean APE was observed between the Barrett predicted PCA and Barrett TK calculators (P = 0.02). Conclusion The study confirms the importance of considering posterior corneal astigmatism remains essential to achieving precise refractive outcomes but also underscores the need for ongoing refinement and evaluation to optimize surgical outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-0d1bd0d80fb14d4b874e90743dbbc851
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2415
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-0d1bd0d80fb14d4b874e90743dbbc8512025-01-26T12:21:05ZengBMCBMC Ophthalmology1471-24152025-01-012511810.1186/s12886-025-03856-9Comparative evaluation of several toric intraocular lens calculators for predicting postoperative refractive astigmatism in cataract surgery: a real-world studyHaocheng Xian0Bingzhen Li1Ziyao Xia2Chun Zhang3Xuemin Li4Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third HospitalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third HospitalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital Eye Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua Medicine, Tsinghua UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third HospitalAbstract Background This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the predictive accuracy of six widely used toric intraocular lens (IOL) calculators in eyes undergoing cataract surgery with toric IOL implantation. Methods This retrospective study reviewed 53 eyes of 53 patients that underwent cataract extraction with toric IOL implantation using Zeiss 709 M. Six toric IOL calculators were evaluated: Barrett toric calculator (with predicted PCA, measured PCA, and TK), Kane formula (predicted PCA), and EVO 2.0 formula (predicted and measured PCA). Postoperative refractive astigmatism prediction errors were comprehensively calculated and analyzed using vector analysis. Results The mean absolute prediction error (APE) ranged from 0.56 ± 0.37 D (Barrett TK) to 0.63 ± 0.46 D (Barrett predicted PCA, PPCA). The proportions of eyes achieving APE ≤ 1.0 D were highest for Barrett TK and Kane predicted PCA (90.6%). The highest proportions of eyes achieving APE ≤ 0.25 D and ≤ 0.50 D were observed with Barrett measured PCA (18.9% and 56.6%, respectively), while the lowest with Barrett PPCA (9.4% and 50.9%, respectively). The study found no statistically significant differences in mean absolute prediction error (APE) among the six calculators (χ² = 6.88, P = 0.23) and the centroid of PE (P = 0.93). A difference in mean APE was observed between the Barrett predicted PCA and Barrett TK calculators (P = 0.02). Conclusion The study confirms the importance of considering posterior corneal astigmatism remains essential to achieving precise refractive outcomes but also underscores the need for ongoing refinement and evaluation to optimize surgical outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-03856-9Cataract surgeryIntraocular lensesIOL power calculation
spellingShingle Haocheng Xian
Bingzhen Li
Ziyao Xia
Chun Zhang
Xuemin Li
Comparative evaluation of several toric intraocular lens calculators for predicting postoperative refractive astigmatism in cataract surgery: a real-world study
BMC Ophthalmology
Cataract surgery
Intraocular lenses
IOL power calculation
title Comparative evaluation of several toric intraocular lens calculators for predicting postoperative refractive astigmatism in cataract surgery: a real-world study
title_full Comparative evaluation of several toric intraocular lens calculators for predicting postoperative refractive astigmatism in cataract surgery: a real-world study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of several toric intraocular lens calculators for predicting postoperative refractive astigmatism in cataract surgery: a real-world study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of several toric intraocular lens calculators for predicting postoperative refractive astigmatism in cataract surgery: a real-world study
title_short Comparative evaluation of several toric intraocular lens calculators for predicting postoperative refractive astigmatism in cataract surgery: a real-world study
title_sort comparative evaluation of several toric intraocular lens calculators for predicting postoperative refractive astigmatism in cataract surgery a real world study
topic Cataract surgery
Intraocular lenses
IOL power calculation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-03856-9
work_keys_str_mv AT haochengxian comparativeevaluationofseveraltoricintraocularlenscalculatorsforpredictingpostoperativerefractiveastigmatismincataractsurgeryarealworldstudy
AT bingzhenli comparativeevaluationofseveraltoricintraocularlenscalculatorsforpredictingpostoperativerefractiveastigmatismincataractsurgeryarealworldstudy
AT ziyaoxia comparativeevaluationofseveraltoricintraocularlenscalculatorsforpredictingpostoperativerefractiveastigmatismincataractsurgeryarealworldstudy
AT chunzhang comparativeevaluationofseveraltoricintraocularlenscalculatorsforpredictingpostoperativerefractiveastigmatismincataractsurgeryarealworldstudy
AT xueminli comparativeevaluationofseveraltoricintraocularlenscalculatorsforpredictingpostoperativerefractiveastigmatismincataractsurgeryarealworldstudy