New System for the Classification of Epiphyseal Separation of the Coracoid Process: Evaluation of Nine Cases and Review of the Literature

Objectives and Design. Epiphyseal separation of the coracoid process (CP) rarely occurs in adolescents. In this retrospective case series, we reviewed the data of nine patients treated at our center and those of 28 patients reported in the literature. This injury can be classified into three types a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takamitsu Mondori, Yoshiyuki Nakagawa, Shimpei Kurata, Shuhei Fujii, Takuya Egawa, Kazuya Inoue, Yasuhito Tanaka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Advances in Orthopedics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9749515
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832553993707978752
author Takamitsu Mondori
Yoshiyuki Nakagawa
Shimpei Kurata
Shuhei Fujii
Takuya Egawa
Kazuya Inoue
Yasuhito Tanaka
author_facet Takamitsu Mondori
Yoshiyuki Nakagawa
Shimpei Kurata
Shuhei Fujii
Takuya Egawa
Kazuya Inoue
Yasuhito Tanaka
author_sort Takamitsu Mondori
collection DOAJ
description Objectives and Design. Epiphyseal separation of the coracoid process (CP) rarely occurs in adolescents. In this retrospective case series, we reviewed the data of nine patients treated at our center and those of 28 patients reported in the literature. This injury can be classified into three types according to the injured area: Type I, base including the area above the glenoid; Type II, center including the coracoclavicular ligament (CCL); and Type III, tip with the short head of the biceps and coracobrachialis, as well as the pectoralis minor. Patients/Participants. A total of 37 patients were included in the analysis. Data on sex, age, cause and mechanism of injury, separation type, concomitant injury around the shoulder girdle, treatment, and functional outcomes were obtained. Main Outcome Measurements and Results. Type I is the most common type. The cause of injury and associated injury around the shoulder girdle were significantly different between Type I, II, and III fractures. The associated acromioclavicular (AC) dislocation and treatment were significantly different between Type I and III fractures. Our new classification system reflects the clinical features, imaging findings, and surgical management of epiphyseal separation of the CP. Type I and II fractures are mostly associated with AC dislocation and have an associated injury around the shoulder girdle. Type III fractures are typically caused by forceful resisted flexion of the arm and elbow. Although the latter are best managed surgically, whether conservative or surgical management is optimal for Type I and II fractures remains controversial. Conclusions. We noted some differences in the clinical characteristics depending on the location of injury; therefore, we aimed to examine these differences to develop a new system for classifying epiphyseal separation of the CP. This would increase the clinicians’ awareness regarding this injury and lead to the development of an appropriate treatment.
format Article
id doaj-art-0ce60580768b4a30ae05d9e0e3b7cea0
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-3464
2090-3472
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Orthopedics
spelling doaj-art-0ce60580768b4a30ae05d9e0e3b7cea02025-02-03T05:52:37ZengWileyAdvances in Orthopedics2090-34642090-34722020-01-01202010.1155/2020/97495159749515New System for the Classification of Epiphyseal Separation of the Coracoid Process: Evaluation of Nine Cases and Review of the LiteratureTakamitsu Mondori0Yoshiyuki Nakagawa1Shimpei Kurata2Shuhei Fujii3Takuya Egawa4Kazuya Inoue5Yasuhito Tanaka6Department of Orthopaedics, Uda City Hospital, Nara Shoulder & Elbow Center, 815 Hagiwara, Haibara, Uda, Nara 633-0298, JapanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Uda City Hospital, Nara Shoulder & Elbow Center, 815 Hagiwara, Haibara, Uda, Nara 633-0298, JapanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijyo, Kashihara, Nara 634-8521, JapanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Nara Prefecture Seiwa Medical Center, 1-14-16 Mimuro, Sangou-cho, Ikoma-gun, Nara 636-0802, JapanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Okanami General Hospital, 1734 Ueno Kuwamachi, Iga, Mie 518-0842, JapanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijyo, Kashihara, Nara 634-8521, JapanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijyo, Kashihara, Nara 634-8521, JapanObjectives and Design. Epiphyseal separation of the coracoid process (CP) rarely occurs in adolescents. In this retrospective case series, we reviewed the data of nine patients treated at our center and those of 28 patients reported in the literature. This injury can be classified into three types according to the injured area: Type I, base including the area above the glenoid; Type II, center including the coracoclavicular ligament (CCL); and Type III, tip with the short head of the biceps and coracobrachialis, as well as the pectoralis minor. Patients/Participants. A total of 37 patients were included in the analysis. Data on sex, age, cause and mechanism of injury, separation type, concomitant injury around the shoulder girdle, treatment, and functional outcomes were obtained. Main Outcome Measurements and Results. Type I is the most common type. The cause of injury and associated injury around the shoulder girdle were significantly different between Type I, II, and III fractures. The associated acromioclavicular (AC) dislocation and treatment were significantly different between Type I and III fractures. Our new classification system reflects the clinical features, imaging findings, and surgical management of epiphyseal separation of the CP. Type I and II fractures are mostly associated with AC dislocation and have an associated injury around the shoulder girdle. Type III fractures are typically caused by forceful resisted flexion of the arm and elbow. Although the latter are best managed surgically, whether conservative or surgical management is optimal for Type I and II fractures remains controversial. Conclusions. We noted some differences in the clinical characteristics depending on the location of injury; therefore, we aimed to examine these differences to develop a new system for classifying epiphyseal separation of the CP. This would increase the clinicians’ awareness regarding this injury and lead to the development of an appropriate treatment.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9749515
spellingShingle Takamitsu Mondori
Yoshiyuki Nakagawa
Shimpei Kurata
Shuhei Fujii
Takuya Egawa
Kazuya Inoue
Yasuhito Tanaka
New System for the Classification of Epiphyseal Separation of the Coracoid Process: Evaluation of Nine Cases and Review of the Literature
Advances in Orthopedics
title New System for the Classification of Epiphyseal Separation of the Coracoid Process: Evaluation of Nine Cases and Review of the Literature
title_full New System for the Classification of Epiphyseal Separation of the Coracoid Process: Evaluation of Nine Cases and Review of the Literature
title_fullStr New System for the Classification of Epiphyseal Separation of the Coracoid Process: Evaluation of Nine Cases and Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed New System for the Classification of Epiphyseal Separation of the Coracoid Process: Evaluation of Nine Cases and Review of the Literature
title_short New System for the Classification of Epiphyseal Separation of the Coracoid Process: Evaluation of Nine Cases and Review of the Literature
title_sort new system for the classification of epiphyseal separation of the coracoid process evaluation of nine cases and review of the literature
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9749515
work_keys_str_mv AT takamitsumondori newsystemfortheclassificationofepiphysealseparationofthecoracoidprocessevaluationofninecasesandreviewoftheliterature
AT yoshiyukinakagawa newsystemfortheclassificationofepiphysealseparationofthecoracoidprocessevaluationofninecasesandreviewoftheliterature
AT shimpeikurata newsystemfortheclassificationofepiphysealseparationofthecoracoidprocessevaluationofninecasesandreviewoftheliterature
AT shuheifujii newsystemfortheclassificationofepiphysealseparationofthecoracoidprocessevaluationofninecasesandreviewoftheliterature
AT takuyaegawa newsystemfortheclassificationofepiphysealseparationofthecoracoidprocessevaluationofninecasesandreviewoftheliterature
AT kazuyainoue newsystemfortheclassificationofepiphysealseparationofthecoracoidprocessevaluationofninecasesandreviewoftheliterature
AT yasuhitotanaka newsystemfortheclassificationofepiphysealseparationofthecoracoidprocessevaluationofninecasesandreviewoftheliterature