Outcome differences in acute vs. acute on chronic heart failure and cardiogenic shock
Abstract Aims Despite advances in coronary reperfusion and percutaneous mechanical circulatory support, mortality among patients presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS) remains unacceptably high. Clinical trials and risk stratification tools have largely focused on acute CS, particularly secondary to...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Tara L. Jones, Michael C. Tan, Vidang Nguyen, Kathleen E. Kearney, Charles C. Maynard, Emily Anderson, Claudius Mahr, James M. McCabe |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2020-06-01
|
Series: | ESC Heart Failure |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12670 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Timing of mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Tanawat Attachaipanich, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Circulatory shock in adults in emergency department
by: Ashok Kumar Pannu
Published: (2023-07-01) -
Effectiveness of an Impella Versus Intra‐Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Who Received Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
by: Yuji Nishimoto, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Single arterial access for Ecpella and jugular venous cannulation provides full mobility on a status 1 heart transplant recipient
by: Macit Bitargil, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01) -
Prevalence, risk factors, and prognostic implications of intraoperative bleeding during CF-LVAD implant
by: Ibrahim Mortada, MD, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01)