The Mechanical Behaviors of Various Dental Implant Materials under Fatigue

The selection of materials has a considerable role on long-term stability of implants. The materials having high resistance to fatigue are required for dental implant applications since these implants are subjected to cyclic loads during chewing. This study evaluates the performance of different typ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fatma Bayata, Cengiz Yildiz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5047319
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832559327030804480
author Fatma Bayata
Cengiz Yildiz
author_facet Fatma Bayata
Cengiz Yildiz
author_sort Fatma Bayata
collection DOAJ
description The selection of materials has a considerable role on long-term stability of implants. The materials having high resistance to fatigue are required for dental implant applications since these implants are subjected to cyclic loads during chewing. This study evaluates the performance of different types of materials (AISI 316L stainless steel, alumina and its porous state, CoCr alloys, yttrium-stabilized zirconia (YSZ), zirconia-toughened alumina (ZTA), and cp Ti with the nanotubular TiO2 surface) by finite element analysis (FEA) under real cyclic biting loads and researches the optimum material for implant applications. For the analysis, the implant design generated by our group was utilized. The mechanical behavior and the life of the implant under biting loads were estimated based on the material and surface properties. According to the condition based on ISO 14801, the FEA results showed that the equivalent von Mises stress values were in the range of 226.95 MPa and 239.05 MPa. The penetration analysis was also performed, and the calculated penetration of the models onto the bone structure ranged between 0.0037389 mm and 0.013626 mm. L-605 CoCr alloy-assigned implant model showed the least penetration, while cp Ti with the nanotubular TiO2 surface led to the most one. However, the difference was about 0.01 mm, and it may not be evaluated as a distinct difference. As the final numerical evaluation item, the fatigue life was executed, and the results were achieved in the range of 4 × 105 and 1 × 109 cycles. These results indicated that different materials showed good performance for each evaluation component, but considering the overall mechanical performance and the treatment process (implant adsorption) by means of surface properties, cp Ti with the nanotubular TiO2 surface material was evaluated as the suitable one, and it may also be implied that it displayed enough performance in the designed dental implant model.
format Article
id doaj-art-0cd8d46f8dd046e69038e77f4d127af6
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8434
1687-8442
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
spelling doaj-art-0cd8d46f8dd046e69038e77f4d127af62025-02-03T01:30:12ZengWileyAdvances in Materials Science and Engineering1687-84341687-84422018-01-01201810.1155/2018/50473195047319The Mechanical Behaviors of Various Dental Implant Materials under FatigueFatma Bayata0Cengiz Yildiz1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Istanbul Bilgi University, 34060 Istanbul, TurkeyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Istanbul, TurkeyThe selection of materials has a considerable role on long-term stability of implants. The materials having high resistance to fatigue are required for dental implant applications since these implants are subjected to cyclic loads during chewing. This study evaluates the performance of different types of materials (AISI 316L stainless steel, alumina and its porous state, CoCr alloys, yttrium-stabilized zirconia (YSZ), zirconia-toughened alumina (ZTA), and cp Ti with the nanotubular TiO2 surface) by finite element analysis (FEA) under real cyclic biting loads and researches the optimum material for implant applications. For the analysis, the implant design generated by our group was utilized. The mechanical behavior and the life of the implant under biting loads were estimated based on the material and surface properties. According to the condition based on ISO 14801, the FEA results showed that the equivalent von Mises stress values were in the range of 226.95 MPa and 239.05 MPa. The penetration analysis was also performed, and the calculated penetration of the models onto the bone structure ranged between 0.0037389 mm and 0.013626 mm. L-605 CoCr alloy-assigned implant model showed the least penetration, while cp Ti with the nanotubular TiO2 surface led to the most one. However, the difference was about 0.01 mm, and it may not be evaluated as a distinct difference. As the final numerical evaluation item, the fatigue life was executed, and the results were achieved in the range of 4 × 105 and 1 × 109 cycles. These results indicated that different materials showed good performance for each evaluation component, but considering the overall mechanical performance and the treatment process (implant adsorption) by means of surface properties, cp Ti with the nanotubular TiO2 surface material was evaluated as the suitable one, and it may also be implied that it displayed enough performance in the designed dental implant model.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5047319
spellingShingle Fatma Bayata
Cengiz Yildiz
The Mechanical Behaviors of Various Dental Implant Materials under Fatigue
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
title The Mechanical Behaviors of Various Dental Implant Materials under Fatigue
title_full The Mechanical Behaviors of Various Dental Implant Materials under Fatigue
title_fullStr The Mechanical Behaviors of Various Dental Implant Materials under Fatigue
title_full_unstemmed The Mechanical Behaviors of Various Dental Implant Materials under Fatigue
title_short The Mechanical Behaviors of Various Dental Implant Materials under Fatigue
title_sort mechanical behaviors of various dental implant materials under fatigue
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5047319
work_keys_str_mv AT fatmabayata themechanicalbehaviorsofvariousdentalimplantmaterialsunderfatigue
AT cengizyildiz themechanicalbehaviorsofvariousdentalimplantmaterialsunderfatigue
AT fatmabayata mechanicalbehaviorsofvariousdentalimplantmaterialsunderfatigue
AT cengizyildiz mechanicalbehaviorsofvariousdentalimplantmaterialsunderfatigue