Mapping Key Populations to Develop Improved HIV and AIDS Interventions: Multiphase Cross-Sectional Observational Mapping Study Using a District and City Approach

BackgroundIndonesia’s vast archipelago and substantial population size present unique challenges in addressing its multifaceted HIV epidemic, with 90% of its 514 districts and cities reporting cases. Identifying key populations (KPs) is essential for effectively targeting int...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pande Putu Januraga, Endang Lukitosari, Lanny Luhukay, Rizky Hasby, Aang Sutrisna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2025-01-01
Series:JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
Online Access:https://publichealth.jmir.org/2025/1/e56820
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832577719033921536
author Pande Putu Januraga
Endang Lukitosari
Lanny Luhukay
Rizky Hasby
Aang Sutrisna
author_facet Pande Putu Januraga
Endang Lukitosari
Lanny Luhukay
Rizky Hasby
Aang Sutrisna
author_sort Pande Putu Januraga
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundIndonesia’s vast archipelago and substantial population size present unique challenges in addressing its multifaceted HIV epidemic, with 90% of its 514 districts and cities reporting cases. Identifying key populations (KPs) is essential for effectively targeting interventions and allocating resources to address the changing dynamics of the epidemic. ObjectiveWe examine the 2022 mapping of Indonesia’s KPs to develop improved HIV and AIDS interventions. MethodsIn 2022, a district-based mapping of KPs was conducted across 201 districts and cities chosen for their HIV program intensity. This multiphase process included participatory workshops for hotspot identification, followed by direct hotspot observation, then followed by a second direct observation in selected hotspots for quality control. Data from 49,346 informants (KPs) were collected and analyzed. The results from individual hotspots were aggregated at the district or city level, and a formula was used to estimate the population size. ResultsThe mapping initiative identified 18,339 hotspots across 201 districts and cities, revealing substantial disparities in hotspot distribution. Of the 18,339 hotspots, 16,964 (92.5%) were observed, of which 1822 (10.74%) underwent a second review to enhance data accuracy. The findings mostly aligned with local stakeholders’ estimates, but showed a lower median. Interviews indicated a shift in KP dynamics, with a median decline in hotspot attendance since the pandemic, and there was notable variation in mapping results across district categories. In “comprehensive” areas, the average results for men who have sex with men (MSM), people who inject drugs, transgender women, and female sex workers (FSWs) were 1008 (median 694, IQR 317-1367), 224 (median 114, IQR 59-202), 196 (median 167, IQR 81-265), and 775 (median 573, IQR 352-1131), respectively. “Medium” areas had lower averages: MSM at 381 (median 199, IQR 91-454), people who inject drugs at 51 (median 54, IQR 15-63), transgender women at 101 (median 55, IQR 29-127), and FSWs at 304 (median 231, IQR 118-425). “Basic” areas showed the lowest averages: MSM at 161 (median 73, IQR 49-285), people who inject drugs at 7 (median 7, IQR 7-7), transgender women at 59 (median 26, IQR 12-60), and FSWs at 161 (median 131, IQR 59-188). Comparisons with ongoing outreach programs revealed substantial differences: the mapped MSM population was >50% lower than program coverage; the estimates for people who inject drugs were twice as high as the program coverage. ConclusionsThe mapping results highlight significant variations in hotspots and KPs across districts and cities and underscore the necessity of adaptive HIV prevention strategies. The findings informed programmatic decisions, such as reallocating resources to underserved districts and recalibrating outreach strategies to better match KP dynamics. Developing strategies beyond identified hotspots, integrating mapping data into planning, and adopting a longitudinal approach to understand KP behavior over time are critical for effective HIV and AIDS prevention and control.
format Article
id doaj-art-0caa256ec5d24574a63bb89d6c5d423b
institution Kabale University
issn 2369-2960
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
spelling doaj-art-0caa256ec5d24574a63bb89d6c5d423b2025-01-30T15:46:12ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Public Health and Surveillance2369-29602025-01-0111e5682010.2196/56820Mapping Key Populations to Develop Improved HIV and AIDS Interventions: Multiphase Cross-Sectional Observational Mapping Study Using a District and City ApproachPande Putu Januragahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2926-0856Endang Lukitosarihttps://orcid.org/0009-0004-7763-3671Lanny Luhukayhttps://orcid.org/0009-0000-5311-4886Rizky Hasbyhttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-9135-5885Aang Sutrisnahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0506-556X BackgroundIndonesia’s vast archipelago and substantial population size present unique challenges in addressing its multifaceted HIV epidemic, with 90% of its 514 districts and cities reporting cases. Identifying key populations (KPs) is essential for effectively targeting interventions and allocating resources to address the changing dynamics of the epidemic. ObjectiveWe examine the 2022 mapping of Indonesia’s KPs to develop improved HIV and AIDS interventions. MethodsIn 2022, a district-based mapping of KPs was conducted across 201 districts and cities chosen for their HIV program intensity. This multiphase process included participatory workshops for hotspot identification, followed by direct hotspot observation, then followed by a second direct observation in selected hotspots for quality control. Data from 49,346 informants (KPs) were collected and analyzed. The results from individual hotspots were aggregated at the district or city level, and a formula was used to estimate the population size. ResultsThe mapping initiative identified 18,339 hotspots across 201 districts and cities, revealing substantial disparities in hotspot distribution. Of the 18,339 hotspots, 16,964 (92.5%) were observed, of which 1822 (10.74%) underwent a second review to enhance data accuracy. The findings mostly aligned with local stakeholders’ estimates, but showed a lower median. Interviews indicated a shift in KP dynamics, with a median decline in hotspot attendance since the pandemic, and there was notable variation in mapping results across district categories. In “comprehensive” areas, the average results for men who have sex with men (MSM), people who inject drugs, transgender women, and female sex workers (FSWs) were 1008 (median 694, IQR 317-1367), 224 (median 114, IQR 59-202), 196 (median 167, IQR 81-265), and 775 (median 573, IQR 352-1131), respectively. “Medium” areas had lower averages: MSM at 381 (median 199, IQR 91-454), people who inject drugs at 51 (median 54, IQR 15-63), transgender women at 101 (median 55, IQR 29-127), and FSWs at 304 (median 231, IQR 118-425). “Basic” areas showed the lowest averages: MSM at 161 (median 73, IQR 49-285), people who inject drugs at 7 (median 7, IQR 7-7), transgender women at 59 (median 26, IQR 12-60), and FSWs at 161 (median 131, IQR 59-188). Comparisons with ongoing outreach programs revealed substantial differences: the mapped MSM population was >50% lower than program coverage; the estimates for people who inject drugs were twice as high as the program coverage. ConclusionsThe mapping results highlight significant variations in hotspots and KPs across districts and cities and underscore the necessity of adaptive HIV prevention strategies. The findings informed programmatic decisions, such as reallocating resources to underserved districts and recalibrating outreach strategies to better match KP dynamics. Developing strategies beyond identified hotspots, integrating mapping data into planning, and adopting a longitudinal approach to understand KP behavior over time are critical for effective HIV and AIDS prevention and control.https://publichealth.jmir.org/2025/1/e56820
spellingShingle Pande Putu Januraga
Endang Lukitosari
Lanny Luhukay
Rizky Hasby
Aang Sutrisna
Mapping Key Populations to Develop Improved HIV and AIDS Interventions: Multiphase Cross-Sectional Observational Mapping Study Using a District and City Approach
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
title Mapping Key Populations to Develop Improved HIV and AIDS Interventions: Multiphase Cross-Sectional Observational Mapping Study Using a District and City Approach
title_full Mapping Key Populations to Develop Improved HIV and AIDS Interventions: Multiphase Cross-Sectional Observational Mapping Study Using a District and City Approach
title_fullStr Mapping Key Populations to Develop Improved HIV and AIDS Interventions: Multiphase Cross-Sectional Observational Mapping Study Using a District and City Approach
title_full_unstemmed Mapping Key Populations to Develop Improved HIV and AIDS Interventions: Multiphase Cross-Sectional Observational Mapping Study Using a District and City Approach
title_short Mapping Key Populations to Develop Improved HIV and AIDS Interventions: Multiphase Cross-Sectional Observational Mapping Study Using a District and City Approach
title_sort mapping key populations to develop improved hiv and aids interventions multiphase cross sectional observational mapping study using a district and city approach
url https://publichealth.jmir.org/2025/1/e56820
work_keys_str_mv AT pandeputujanuraga mappingkeypopulationstodevelopimprovedhivandaidsinterventionsmultiphasecrosssectionalobservationalmappingstudyusingadistrictandcityapproach
AT endanglukitosari mappingkeypopulationstodevelopimprovedhivandaidsinterventionsmultiphasecrosssectionalobservationalmappingstudyusingadistrictandcityapproach
AT lannyluhukay mappingkeypopulationstodevelopimprovedhivandaidsinterventionsmultiphasecrosssectionalobservationalmappingstudyusingadistrictandcityapproach
AT rizkyhasby mappingkeypopulationstodevelopimprovedhivandaidsinterventionsmultiphasecrosssectionalobservationalmappingstudyusingadistrictandcityapproach
AT aangsutrisna mappingkeypopulationstodevelopimprovedhivandaidsinterventionsmultiphasecrosssectionalobservationalmappingstudyusingadistrictandcityapproach