Comparative analysis of real-world data on the efficacy and safety of and adherence to ICS/LABA combinations in asthma management

Abstract Background Choosing effective devices (inhaled corticosteroid [ICS]-long-acting β2 agonist [LABA] combination inhalers) as maintenance treatment is critical for managing patients with asthma. We aimed to compare ICS/LABA combination efficacy, safety, and adherence across inhaler types and c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hee Sun Park, Jungkuk Lee, Hasung Kim, Seong-Dae Woo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:Respiratory Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-024-03084-7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832594457190465536
author Hee Sun Park
Jungkuk Lee
Hasung Kim
Seong-Dae Woo
author_facet Hee Sun Park
Jungkuk Lee
Hasung Kim
Seong-Dae Woo
author_sort Hee Sun Park
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Choosing effective devices (inhaled corticosteroid [ICS]-long-acting β2 agonist [LABA] combination inhalers) as maintenance treatment is critical for managing patients with asthma. We aimed to compare ICS/LABA combination efficacy, safety, and adherence across inhaler types and components in patients newly diagnosed with asthma. Methods Utilizing South Korea’s National Health Insurance Service data, we conducted a population-based cohort study involving patients aged 18–80 years, newly diagnosed with asthma who received ICS/LABA combination therapy between January 2016 and December 2020. Outcomes assessed included treatment adherence, asthma exacerbations, hospitalizations, emergency-department visits, mortality, and safety outcomes within 3-month and 1-year post-index periods. Results Overall, 13,850 eligible patients were included, with subgroups categorized and compared according to inhaler type and component (metered dose inhalers [MDIs] vs. dry powder inhalers [DPIs], budesonide vs. fluticasone, and formoterol vs. salmeterol). Efficacy and safety profiles did not significantly differ across device types or ICS/LABA combination components during the 3-month and 1-year follow-up periods. However, the DPI group exhibited a significantly higher mean proportion of days covered (0.67 ± 0.23 vs. 0.62 ± 0.23; P < 0.001) and a lower risk of discontinuation (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.867; 95% confidence interval, 0.804–0.927; P < 0.001) than did the MDI group, with no significant differences observed between the other subgroups. Conclusions The choice of inhaler device (MDI vs. DPI) and specific ICS/LABA combination components does not significantly impact efficacy and safety profiles in patients newly diagnosed with asthma. However, DPI use may be associated with improved adherence. These results provide valuable insights for clinicians in selecting appropriate and individually tailored inhaler therapies in real-world settings. Graphical abstract
format Article
id doaj-art-0ca034688c314656b79c26061001122e
institution Kabale University
issn 1465-993X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Respiratory Research
spelling doaj-art-0ca034688c314656b79c26061001122e2025-01-19T12:36:31ZengBMCRespiratory Research1465-993X2025-01-0126111110.1186/s12931-024-03084-7Comparative analysis of real-world data on the efficacy and safety of and adherence to ICS/LABA combinations in asthma managementHee Sun Park0Jungkuk Lee1Hasung Kim2Seong-Dae Woo3Department of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Chungnam National University School of MedicineData Science Team, Hanmi Pharm. Co., LtdData Science Team, Hanmi Pharm. Co., LtdDepartment of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Chungnam National University School of MedicineAbstract Background Choosing effective devices (inhaled corticosteroid [ICS]-long-acting β2 agonist [LABA] combination inhalers) as maintenance treatment is critical for managing patients with asthma. We aimed to compare ICS/LABA combination efficacy, safety, and adherence across inhaler types and components in patients newly diagnosed with asthma. Methods Utilizing South Korea’s National Health Insurance Service data, we conducted a population-based cohort study involving patients aged 18–80 years, newly diagnosed with asthma who received ICS/LABA combination therapy between January 2016 and December 2020. Outcomes assessed included treatment adherence, asthma exacerbations, hospitalizations, emergency-department visits, mortality, and safety outcomes within 3-month and 1-year post-index periods. Results Overall, 13,850 eligible patients were included, with subgroups categorized and compared according to inhaler type and component (metered dose inhalers [MDIs] vs. dry powder inhalers [DPIs], budesonide vs. fluticasone, and formoterol vs. salmeterol). Efficacy and safety profiles did not significantly differ across device types or ICS/LABA combination components during the 3-month and 1-year follow-up periods. However, the DPI group exhibited a significantly higher mean proportion of days covered (0.67 ± 0.23 vs. 0.62 ± 0.23; P < 0.001) and a lower risk of discontinuation (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.867; 95% confidence interval, 0.804–0.927; P < 0.001) than did the MDI group, with no significant differences observed between the other subgroups. Conclusions The choice of inhaler device (MDI vs. DPI) and specific ICS/LABA combination components does not significantly impact efficacy and safety profiles in patients newly diagnosed with asthma. However, DPI use may be associated with improved adherence. These results provide valuable insights for clinicians in selecting appropriate and individually tailored inhaler therapies in real-world settings. Graphical abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-024-03084-7AdherenceAsthmaEfficacy and safetyICS/LABA combinationsInhaler typesReal-world outcomes
spellingShingle Hee Sun Park
Jungkuk Lee
Hasung Kim
Seong-Dae Woo
Comparative analysis of real-world data on the efficacy and safety of and adherence to ICS/LABA combinations in asthma management
Respiratory Research
Adherence
Asthma
Efficacy and safety
ICS/LABA combinations
Inhaler types
Real-world outcomes
title Comparative analysis of real-world data on the efficacy and safety of and adherence to ICS/LABA combinations in asthma management
title_full Comparative analysis of real-world data on the efficacy and safety of and adherence to ICS/LABA combinations in asthma management
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of real-world data on the efficacy and safety of and adherence to ICS/LABA combinations in asthma management
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of real-world data on the efficacy and safety of and adherence to ICS/LABA combinations in asthma management
title_short Comparative analysis of real-world data on the efficacy and safety of and adherence to ICS/LABA combinations in asthma management
title_sort comparative analysis of real world data on the efficacy and safety of and adherence to ics laba combinations in asthma management
topic Adherence
Asthma
Efficacy and safety
ICS/LABA combinations
Inhaler types
Real-world outcomes
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-024-03084-7
work_keys_str_mv AT heesunpark comparativeanalysisofrealworlddataontheefficacyandsafetyofandadherencetoicslabacombinationsinasthmamanagement
AT jungkuklee comparativeanalysisofrealworlddataontheefficacyandsafetyofandadherencetoicslabacombinationsinasthmamanagement
AT hasungkim comparativeanalysisofrealworlddataontheefficacyandsafetyofandadherencetoicslabacombinationsinasthmamanagement
AT seongdaewoo comparativeanalysisofrealworlddataontheefficacyandsafetyofandadherencetoicslabacombinationsinasthmamanagement