Digestive jurisprudence restated: On breakfast and digestion as bias-arousers
Digestive Jurisprudence" is the view that judicial decisions depend on what judges had for breakfast. The view is usually associated with Frank's version of Legal Realism. The paper shows that, disputable as it is, that view comes from the philosophical background of Peirce's pragmati...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Tuzet Giovanni |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law, Belgrade, Serbia
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0003-2565/2023/0003-25652303417T.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The Impact of rhetoric on Jerome Frank's "Digestive jurisprudence"
by: Avramović Dragutin, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
The main stages of Roman law assimilation into European jurisprudence
by: Sergey E. Metelev, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
MULTIPLICITY OF CRIMES IN INDONESIAN LAW: REGULATION AND DETERMINATION OF CONCURSUS REALIS
by: Delycia Anwar Rannu, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01) -
Habits and Dispositions in Frank Ramsey’s Philosophy
by: Alice Morelli
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Introduction to jurisprudence : a beginner's guide /
by: Yoboka, Allen Milton T. R.
Published: (2023)