“If the End Justifies the Means, Then This Is Permissible…”: Academic Deviations of Russian Postgraduate Students in Socio-Humanitarian Areas

This article looks at academic deviation practices from the viewpoint of graduate students, as well as whether or not they find certain types of deviant behavior in science and education acceptable. The theoretical framework consisted of two mutually exclusive approaches to the interpretation of aca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. A. Kashina, V. A. Vasilyeva, S. Tkach
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Moscow Polytechnic University 2024-04-01
Series:Высшее образование в России
Subjects:
Online Access:https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/4875
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832574351183970304
author M. A. Kashina
V. A. Vasilyeva
S. Tkach
author_facet M. A. Kashina
V. A. Vasilyeva
S. Tkach
author_sort M. A. Kashina
collection DOAJ
description This article looks at academic deviation practices from the viewpoint of graduate students, as well as whether or not they find certain types of deviant behavior in science and education acceptable. The theoretical framework consisted of two mutually exclusive approaches to the interpretation of academic deviations: the normativist R. Descartes and the epistemic anarchism of P. Feyerabend. The study purpose is to evaluate graduate students in socio-humanitarian scientific specializations regarding the prevalence and attitude toward academic deviation. Main hypothesis: postgraduate students’ views regarding academic deviations, especially plagiarism, fall on a continuum, ranging from total denial to total acceptance. Research design: quantitativequalitative. Empirical base: online survey (1276 respondents, including 185 graduate students), 5 focus groups. Methods of analysis: cluster analysis using the k-nearest neighbors method, qualitative analysis of focus group materials. Main results. It was discovered that creating crib sheets was the most prevalent form of academic deviation among graduate students. Of the respondents, 66% selected “often” and “very often” as their options. The purchase of exams, abstracts, and coursework showed the least amount of variation. Ten percent of those surveyed said that graduate students used plagiarism frequently or extremely frequently. Based on their attitudes regarding plagiarism, five distinct groups could be identified using cluster analysis, three of which would be more tolerant of it. Simultaneously, two of the five groups place the blame on students, and three see plagiarism as a result of the educational system’s failure to some extent. Directions for further research are related to the analysis of other forms of deviation, for example, practices of academic collusion within a university, as well as a description of the objective reasons for graduate students committing academic deviations, consideration of the prevalence of academic deviations of graduate students as a sign of a crisis in the normative foundations of the institution of graduate school.
format Article
id doaj-art-0a7e366bf5904762b8000e2674b6a243
institution Kabale University
issn 0869-3617
2072-0459
language English
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Moscow Polytechnic University
record_format Article
series Высшее образование в России
spelling doaj-art-0a7e366bf5904762b8000e2674b6a2432025-02-01T13:14:32ZengMoscow Polytechnic UniversityВысшее образование в России0869-36172072-04592024-04-013338410310.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-3-84-1032458“If the End Justifies the Means, Then This Is Permissible…”: Academic Deviations of Russian Postgraduate Students in Socio-Humanitarian AreasM. A. Kashina0V. A. Vasilyeva1S. Tkach2Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-Western Institute of Management RANEPA)Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-Western Institute of Management RANEPA)Center for Applied Sociology St. Petersburg State UniversityThis article looks at academic deviation practices from the viewpoint of graduate students, as well as whether or not they find certain types of deviant behavior in science and education acceptable. The theoretical framework consisted of two mutually exclusive approaches to the interpretation of academic deviations: the normativist R. Descartes and the epistemic anarchism of P. Feyerabend. The study purpose is to evaluate graduate students in socio-humanitarian scientific specializations regarding the prevalence and attitude toward academic deviation. Main hypothesis: postgraduate students’ views regarding academic deviations, especially plagiarism, fall on a continuum, ranging from total denial to total acceptance. Research design: quantitativequalitative. Empirical base: online survey (1276 respondents, including 185 graduate students), 5 focus groups. Methods of analysis: cluster analysis using the k-nearest neighbors method, qualitative analysis of focus group materials. Main results. It was discovered that creating crib sheets was the most prevalent form of academic deviation among graduate students. Of the respondents, 66% selected “often” and “very often” as their options. The purchase of exams, abstracts, and coursework showed the least amount of variation. Ten percent of those surveyed said that graduate students used plagiarism frequently or extremely frequently. Based on their attitudes regarding plagiarism, five distinct groups could be identified using cluster analysis, three of which would be more tolerant of it. Simultaneously, two of the five groups place the blame on students, and three see plagiarism as a result of the educational system’s failure to some extent. Directions for further research are related to the analysis of other forms of deviation, for example, practices of academic collusion within a university, as well as a description of the objective reasons for graduate students committing academic deviations, consideration of the prevalence of academic deviations of graduate students as a sign of a crisis in the normative foundations of the institution of graduate school.https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/4875academic writingacademic dishonestytolerance for deviationsthird stage of higher educationpseudosciencepseudoscientist
spellingShingle M. A. Kashina
V. A. Vasilyeva
S. Tkach
“If the End Justifies the Means, Then This Is Permissible…”: Academic Deviations of Russian Postgraduate Students in Socio-Humanitarian Areas
Высшее образование в России
academic writing
academic dishonesty
tolerance for deviations
third stage of higher education
pseudoscience
pseudoscientist
title “If the End Justifies the Means, Then This Is Permissible…”: Academic Deviations of Russian Postgraduate Students in Socio-Humanitarian Areas
title_full “If the End Justifies the Means, Then This Is Permissible…”: Academic Deviations of Russian Postgraduate Students in Socio-Humanitarian Areas
title_fullStr “If the End Justifies the Means, Then This Is Permissible…”: Academic Deviations of Russian Postgraduate Students in Socio-Humanitarian Areas
title_full_unstemmed “If the End Justifies the Means, Then This Is Permissible…”: Academic Deviations of Russian Postgraduate Students in Socio-Humanitarian Areas
title_short “If the End Justifies the Means, Then This Is Permissible…”: Academic Deviations of Russian Postgraduate Students in Socio-Humanitarian Areas
title_sort if the end justifies the means then this is permissible academic deviations of russian postgraduate students in socio humanitarian areas
topic academic writing
academic dishonesty
tolerance for deviations
third stage of higher education
pseudoscience
pseudoscientist
url https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/4875
work_keys_str_mv AT makashina iftheendjustifiesthemeansthenthisispermissibleacademicdeviationsofrussianpostgraduatestudentsinsociohumanitarianareas
AT vavasilyeva iftheendjustifiesthemeansthenthisispermissibleacademicdeviationsofrussianpostgraduatestudentsinsociohumanitarianareas
AT stkach iftheendjustifiesthemeansthenthisispermissibleacademicdeviationsofrussianpostgraduatestudentsinsociohumanitarianareas