Renal Transplant Pathology: Demographic Features and Histopathological Analysis of the Causes of Graft Dysfunction

Background. Renal transplant has emerged as a preferred treatment modality in cases of end-stage renal disease; however, a small percentage of cases suffer from graft dysfunction. Aim. To evaluate the renal transplant biopsies and analyze the various causes of graft dysfunction. Materials and Method...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shaarif Bashir, Mudassar Hussain, Azhar Ali Khan, Usman Hassan, Khawaja Sajid Mushtaq, Maryam Hameed, Usman Ayub Awan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:International Journal of Nephrology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/7289701
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832547126987456512
author Shaarif Bashir
Mudassar Hussain
Azhar Ali Khan
Usman Hassan
Khawaja Sajid Mushtaq
Maryam Hameed
Usman Ayub Awan
author_facet Shaarif Bashir
Mudassar Hussain
Azhar Ali Khan
Usman Hassan
Khawaja Sajid Mushtaq
Maryam Hameed
Usman Ayub Awan
author_sort Shaarif Bashir
collection DOAJ
description Background. Renal transplant has emerged as a preferred treatment modality in cases of end-stage renal disease; however, a small percentage of cases suffer from graft dysfunction. Aim. To evaluate the renal transplant biopsies and analyze the various causes of graft dysfunction. Materials and Methods. 163 renal transplant biopsies, reported between 2014 and 2019 and who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, were evaluated with respect to demographics, clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical features. Results. Of 163 patients, 26 (16%) were females and 137 (84%) were males with a mean age of 34 ± 7 years. 53 (32.5%) cases were of rejection (ABMR and TCMR), 1 (0.6%) was borderline, 15 were of IFTA, and rest of 94 cases (57.7%) belonged to the others category. SCr (serum creatinine) in cases of rejection was 3.85 ± 0.55 mg/dl. Causes of early graft dysfunction included active ABMR (7.1 ± 4.7 months), acute TCMR (5.5 months), and acute tubular necrosis (after 6 ± 2.2 months of transplant) while the causes of late rejection were CNIT and IFTA (34 ± 4.7 and 35 ± 7.8 months, respectively). Conclusion. Renal graft dysfunction still remains a concerning area for both clinicians and patients. Biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing the exact cause of graft dysfunction and in planning further management.
format Article
id doaj-art-0a71dccd92e74049a2058487d5e1d7ac
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-214X
2090-2158
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Nephrology
spelling doaj-art-0a71dccd92e74049a2058487d5e1d7ac2025-02-03T06:45:51ZengWileyInternational Journal of Nephrology2090-214X2090-21582020-01-01202010.1155/2020/72897017289701Renal Transplant Pathology: Demographic Features and Histopathological Analysis of the Causes of Graft DysfunctionShaarif Bashir0Mudassar Hussain1Azhar Ali Khan2Usman Hassan3Khawaja Sajid Mushtaq4Maryam Hameed5Usman Ayub Awan6Department of Pathology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore 54000, PakistanDepartment of Pathology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore 54000, PakistanDepartment of Nephrology, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore 54000, PakistanDepartment of Pathology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore 54000, PakistanDepartment of Pathology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore 54000, PakistanDepartment of Pathology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore 54000, PakistanDepartment of Pathology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore 54000, PakistanBackground. Renal transplant has emerged as a preferred treatment modality in cases of end-stage renal disease; however, a small percentage of cases suffer from graft dysfunction. Aim. To evaluate the renal transplant biopsies and analyze the various causes of graft dysfunction. Materials and Methods. 163 renal transplant biopsies, reported between 2014 and 2019 and who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, were evaluated with respect to demographics, clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical features. Results. Of 163 patients, 26 (16%) were females and 137 (84%) were males with a mean age of 34 ± 7 years. 53 (32.5%) cases were of rejection (ABMR and TCMR), 1 (0.6%) was borderline, 15 were of IFTA, and rest of 94 cases (57.7%) belonged to the others category. SCr (serum creatinine) in cases of rejection was 3.85 ± 0.55 mg/dl. Causes of early graft dysfunction included active ABMR (7.1 ± 4.7 months), acute TCMR (5.5 months), and acute tubular necrosis (after 6 ± 2.2 months of transplant) while the causes of late rejection were CNIT and IFTA (34 ± 4.7 and 35 ± 7.8 months, respectively). Conclusion. Renal graft dysfunction still remains a concerning area for both clinicians and patients. Biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing the exact cause of graft dysfunction and in planning further management.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/7289701
spellingShingle Shaarif Bashir
Mudassar Hussain
Azhar Ali Khan
Usman Hassan
Khawaja Sajid Mushtaq
Maryam Hameed
Usman Ayub Awan
Renal Transplant Pathology: Demographic Features and Histopathological Analysis of the Causes of Graft Dysfunction
International Journal of Nephrology
title Renal Transplant Pathology: Demographic Features and Histopathological Analysis of the Causes of Graft Dysfunction
title_full Renal Transplant Pathology: Demographic Features and Histopathological Analysis of the Causes of Graft Dysfunction
title_fullStr Renal Transplant Pathology: Demographic Features and Histopathological Analysis of the Causes of Graft Dysfunction
title_full_unstemmed Renal Transplant Pathology: Demographic Features and Histopathological Analysis of the Causes of Graft Dysfunction
title_short Renal Transplant Pathology: Demographic Features and Histopathological Analysis of the Causes of Graft Dysfunction
title_sort renal transplant pathology demographic features and histopathological analysis of the causes of graft dysfunction
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/7289701
work_keys_str_mv AT shaarifbashir renaltransplantpathologydemographicfeaturesandhistopathologicalanalysisofthecausesofgraftdysfunction
AT mudassarhussain renaltransplantpathologydemographicfeaturesandhistopathologicalanalysisofthecausesofgraftdysfunction
AT azharalikhan renaltransplantpathologydemographicfeaturesandhistopathologicalanalysisofthecausesofgraftdysfunction
AT usmanhassan renaltransplantpathologydemographicfeaturesandhistopathologicalanalysisofthecausesofgraftdysfunction
AT khawajasajidmushtaq renaltransplantpathologydemographicfeaturesandhistopathologicalanalysisofthecausesofgraftdysfunction
AT maryamhameed renaltransplantpathologydemographicfeaturesandhistopathologicalanalysisofthecausesofgraftdysfunction
AT usmanayubawan renaltransplantpathologydemographicfeaturesandhistopathologicalanalysisofthecausesofgraftdysfunction