Adrenal venous sampling criteria for chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay as a preferable alternative to radioimmunoassay in primary aldosteronism

Plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) was routinely measured using radioimmunoassay (RIA); however, the RIA kit was discontinued in March 2021 in Japan. This study examined PAC conversion in adrenal venous sampling (AVS) and AVS criteria when measured using chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEI...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kazuki Nakai, Yuya Tsurutani, Koki Irie, Kyoko Teruyama, Sachiko Suematsu, Seishi Matsui, Kohzoh Makita, Jun Saito, Masao Omura, Tetsuo Nishikawa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Japan Endocrine Society 2024-05-01
Series:Endocrine Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/endocrj/71/5/71_EJ23-0695/_html/-char/en
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832591674767835136
author Kazuki Nakai
Yuya Tsurutani
Koki Irie
Kyoko Teruyama
Sachiko Suematsu
Seishi Matsui
Kohzoh Makita
Jun Saito
Masao Omura
Tetsuo Nishikawa
author_facet Kazuki Nakai
Yuya Tsurutani
Koki Irie
Kyoko Teruyama
Sachiko Suematsu
Seishi Matsui
Kohzoh Makita
Jun Saito
Masao Omura
Tetsuo Nishikawa
author_sort Kazuki Nakai
collection DOAJ
description Plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) was routinely measured using radioimmunoassay (RIA); however, the RIA kit was discontinued in March 2021 in Japan. This study examined PAC conversion in adrenal venous sampling (AVS) and AVS criteria when measured using chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA). PAC of 415 adrenal venous blood samples from AVS (including segmental AVS) of 63 patients with primary aldosteronism was measured using RIA (Spac-S aldosterone kit; Fujirebio Inc.) and CLEIA (Lumipulse Presto Aldosterone; Fujirebio Inc.). PAC of 70 AVS samples was also measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS, ASKA Pharma Medical Co., Ltd.). PAC conversion formulas were determined for each AVS sample assay. PAC measured using CLEIA was significantly correlated with that measured using RIA (correlation coefficient = 0.971). The PAC conversion formula was PAC (CLEIA) = PAC (RIA) × 0.772 – 1,199 pg/mL. The PAC of 14,000 pg/mL in RIA was equivalent to 9,613 pg/mL in CLEIA. PAC measured using CLEIA was also correlated with that measured using LC-MS/MS, and the PAC conversion formula was PAC (CLEIA, pg/mL) = 0.97 × PAC (LC-MS/MS, pg/mL) + 211. The inter-assay coefficient of variability (CV) was 1.1–1.3% and intra-assay CV was 1.0–1.7%, measured using CLEIA. The PAC conversion formula for AVS samples was obtained using CLEIA and RIA, and the conversion formula was different from that for peripheral blood. PAC values measured by CLEIA showed preferable accuracy and high concordance with those measured by LC-MS/MS, even in AVS samples. The study outcomes are useful for interpreting AVS results using non-RIA measurement methods.
format Article
id doaj-art-0a6906b18a6d400dbd92576d2eb925d2
institution Kabale University
issn 1348-4540
language English
publishDate 2024-05-01
publisher The Japan Endocrine Society
record_format Article
series Endocrine Journal
spelling doaj-art-0a6906b18a6d400dbd92576d2eb925d22025-01-22T06:39:10ZengThe Japan Endocrine SocietyEndocrine Journal1348-45402024-05-0171546146910.1507/endocrj.EJ23-0695endocrjAdrenal venous sampling criteria for chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay as a preferable alternative to radioimmunoassay in primary aldosteronismKazuki Nakai0Yuya Tsurutani1Koki Irie2Kyoko Teruyama3Sachiko Suematsu4Seishi Matsui5Kohzoh Makita6Jun Saito7Masao Omura8Tetsuo Nishikawa9Endocrinology and Diabetes Center, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa 222-0036, JapanEndocrinology and Diabetes Center, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa 222-0036, JapanEndocrinology and Diabetes Center, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa 222-0036, JapanProduct Planning Department, Fujirebio Inc., Tokyo 107-0052, JapanEndocrinology and Diabetes Center, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa 222-0036, JapanDepartment of Radiology, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa 222-0036, JapanDepartment of Radiology, Nerima Hikarigaoka Hospital, Tokyo 179-0072, JapanEndocrinology and Diabetes Center, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa 222-0036, JapanEndocrinology and Diabetes Center, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa 222-0036, JapanEndocrinology and Diabetes Center, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa 222-0036, JapanPlasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) was routinely measured using radioimmunoassay (RIA); however, the RIA kit was discontinued in March 2021 in Japan. This study examined PAC conversion in adrenal venous sampling (AVS) and AVS criteria when measured using chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA). PAC of 415 adrenal venous blood samples from AVS (including segmental AVS) of 63 patients with primary aldosteronism was measured using RIA (Spac-S aldosterone kit; Fujirebio Inc.) and CLEIA (Lumipulse Presto Aldosterone; Fujirebio Inc.). PAC of 70 AVS samples was also measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS, ASKA Pharma Medical Co., Ltd.). PAC conversion formulas were determined for each AVS sample assay. PAC measured using CLEIA was significantly correlated with that measured using RIA (correlation coefficient = 0.971). The PAC conversion formula was PAC (CLEIA) = PAC (RIA) × 0.772 – 1,199 pg/mL. The PAC of 14,000 pg/mL in RIA was equivalent to 9,613 pg/mL in CLEIA. PAC measured using CLEIA was also correlated with that measured using LC-MS/MS, and the PAC conversion formula was PAC (CLEIA, pg/mL) = 0.97 × PAC (LC-MS/MS, pg/mL) + 211. The inter-assay coefficient of variability (CV) was 1.1–1.3% and intra-assay CV was 1.0–1.7%, measured using CLEIA. The PAC conversion formula for AVS samples was obtained using CLEIA and RIA, and the conversion formula was different from that for peripheral blood. PAC values measured by CLEIA showed preferable accuracy and high concordance with those measured by LC-MS/MS, even in AVS samples. The study outcomes are useful for interpreting AVS results using non-RIA measurement methods.https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/endocrj/71/5/71_EJ23-0695/_html/-char/enprimary aldosteronismadrenal venous samplingplasma aldosterone concentration conversionradioimmunoassaychemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay
spellingShingle Kazuki Nakai
Yuya Tsurutani
Koki Irie
Kyoko Teruyama
Sachiko Suematsu
Seishi Matsui
Kohzoh Makita
Jun Saito
Masao Omura
Tetsuo Nishikawa
Adrenal venous sampling criteria for chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay as a preferable alternative to radioimmunoassay in primary aldosteronism
Endocrine Journal
primary aldosteronism
adrenal venous sampling
plasma aldosterone concentration conversion
radioimmunoassay
chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay
title Adrenal venous sampling criteria for chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay as a preferable alternative to radioimmunoassay in primary aldosteronism
title_full Adrenal venous sampling criteria for chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay as a preferable alternative to radioimmunoassay in primary aldosteronism
title_fullStr Adrenal venous sampling criteria for chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay as a preferable alternative to radioimmunoassay in primary aldosteronism
title_full_unstemmed Adrenal venous sampling criteria for chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay as a preferable alternative to radioimmunoassay in primary aldosteronism
title_short Adrenal venous sampling criteria for chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay as a preferable alternative to radioimmunoassay in primary aldosteronism
title_sort adrenal venous sampling criteria for chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay as a preferable alternative to radioimmunoassay in primary aldosteronism
topic primary aldosteronism
adrenal venous sampling
plasma aldosterone concentration conversion
radioimmunoassay
chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay
url https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/endocrj/71/5/71_EJ23-0695/_html/-char/en
work_keys_str_mv AT kazukinakai adrenalvenoussamplingcriteriaforchemiluminescentenzymeimmunoassayasapreferablealternativetoradioimmunoassayinprimaryaldosteronism
AT yuyatsurutani adrenalvenoussamplingcriteriaforchemiluminescentenzymeimmunoassayasapreferablealternativetoradioimmunoassayinprimaryaldosteronism
AT kokiirie adrenalvenoussamplingcriteriaforchemiluminescentenzymeimmunoassayasapreferablealternativetoradioimmunoassayinprimaryaldosteronism
AT kyokoteruyama adrenalvenoussamplingcriteriaforchemiluminescentenzymeimmunoassayasapreferablealternativetoradioimmunoassayinprimaryaldosteronism
AT sachikosuematsu adrenalvenoussamplingcriteriaforchemiluminescentenzymeimmunoassayasapreferablealternativetoradioimmunoassayinprimaryaldosteronism
AT seishimatsui adrenalvenoussamplingcriteriaforchemiluminescentenzymeimmunoassayasapreferablealternativetoradioimmunoassayinprimaryaldosteronism
AT kohzohmakita adrenalvenoussamplingcriteriaforchemiluminescentenzymeimmunoassayasapreferablealternativetoradioimmunoassayinprimaryaldosteronism
AT junsaito adrenalvenoussamplingcriteriaforchemiluminescentenzymeimmunoassayasapreferablealternativetoradioimmunoassayinprimaryaldosteronism
AT masaoomura adrenalvenoussamplingcriteriaforchemiluminescentenzymeimmunoassayasapreferablealternativetoradioimmunoassayinprimaryaldosteronism
AT tetsuonishikawa adrenalvenoussamplingcriteriaforchemiluminescentenzymeimmunoassayasapreferablealternativetoradioimmunoassayinprimaryaldosteronism